Ischemic Complications of Percutaneous Femoral Artery Catheterization (original) (raw)

Management of vascular complications following femoral artery catheterization with and without percutaneous arterial closure devices

Annals of vascular surgery, 2002

Percutaneous arterial closure devices allow earlier mobilization and discharge of patients after arterial catheterization than with manual compression for puncture site hemostasis. We reviewed our recent experience managing the complications of femoral artery catheterization with and without these devices on the vascular surgery service at a tertiary hospital. Thirty-one patients presenting over an 18-month period with complications after femoral artery catheterization with manual compression (n = 21) or percutaneous arterial closure devices (n = 10) were retrospectively reviewed.

Clinical and Subclinical Femoral Vascular Complications after Deployment of two Different Vascular Closure Devices or Manual Compression in the Setting of Coronary Intervention

International Journal of Medical Sciences, 2016

Background: In the past two decades vascular closure devices (VCD) have been increasingly utilized as an alternative to manual compression after percutaneous femoral artery access. However, there is a lack of data confirming a significant reduction of vascular complication in a routine interventional setting. Systematic assessment of puncture sites with ultrasound was hardly performed. Methods: 620 consecutive patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated to either Angioseal (AS; n = 210), or Starclose (SC; n = 196) or manual compression (MC; n = 214). As an adjunct to clinical evaluation vascular ultrasonography was used to assess the safety of each hemostatic method in terms of major and minor vascular complications. The efficacy of VCDs was assessed by achievement of puncture site hemostasis. Results: No major complications needing transfusion or vascular surgery were observed. Furthermore, the overall incidence of clinical and subclinical minor complications was similar among the three groups. There was no differences in the occurrence of pseudoaneurysmata (AS = 10; SC = 6; MC = 10), arteriovenous fistula (AS = 1; SC = 4; MC = 2) and large hematoma (AS = 11; SC = 10; MC = 14). The choice of access site treatment had no impact in the duration of hospital stay (AS = 6.7; SC = 7.4; MS = 6.4 days). Conclusions: In the setting of routine coronary intervention AS and SC provide a similar efficacy and safety as manual compression. Subclinical vascular injuries are rare and not related to VCD use.

Management of acute lower limb ischemia following percutaneous arterial closure device application: our experience

Il Giornale di chirurgia, 2006

The Authors report their experience in the management of acute lower limb ischemia following percutaneous arterial closure device application. Five patients required an emergency vascular operations for acute lower limb ischemia. The symptoms onset was < 1 hour in 1 case, 4-12 hours in 2 cases and > 24-36 hours in 2 cases. A preoperative angiography was performed in all the cases. A transfemoral embolectomy was carried out. Direct suture repair were performed in three cases, vein patch angioplasty was carried out in two cases. In one case, a common femoral artery endarterectomy was performed. No post-operative mortality and limb loss occurred. Acute lower limb ischemia due to closure devices required an extensive approach with reconstruction in high risk septic area. Angiography is mandatory for surgical strategies. We prefer direct suture repair and vein path angioplasty for vascular reconstruction.

Management of early and late detected vascular complications following femoral arterial puncture for cardiac catheterization

Hellenic Journal of Cardiology Hjc Hellēnikē Kardiologikē Epitheōrēsē, 2007

Introduction: latrogenic vascular trauma is more frequent today as a result of the increase in diagnostic and therapeutic femoral catheterizations. Management of related complications is elective or urgent and sometimes needs complex vascular reconstruction. The present study evaluated when and whether conservative, urgent surgical, or elective surgical treatment is appropriate. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 45 consecutive iatrogenic vascular trauma patients, among 10,450 cardiac diagnostic or therapeutic catheterizations. Patients' demographics, type of catheterization, time from catheterization to initial diagnosis, the type of complication (thrombosis, infection, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, etc.), time from presentation of the complication to definite treatment, diagnostic imaging and decision making, the surgical or conservative management, the length of stay and the clinical outcome were determined and analyzed. Results: We identified and treated 30 early and 15 late (after patient's discharge) arterial complications: 18 pseudoaneurysms, 6 bleedings, 9 hematomas, 5 deep vein thromboses, 3 arteriovenous fistulas, 2 arterial embolisms and 2 arterial thromboses. Eight patients underwent emergency surgical repair, three elective surgical repair and 31 were managed conservatively. Decision making was based only on clinical evaluation in 12 patients, whereas vascular ultrasound was the most frequent diagnostic imaging modality in the remainder. A total of 10 (22.2%) minor secondary complications were identified after the initial management with no limb loss and zero mortality. Conclusions: Close clinical observation and conservative management of vascular trauma complications resulted in a low incidence of the necessity for surgical repair (25% of cases). Bleeding and acute leg ischemia were the most frequent indication for emergency surgical treatment, whereas the majority of pseudoaneurysms, fistulas and vein thrombosis were successfully treated conservatively. Late vascular complications do occur and add an important morbidity factor to early catheterization complications.

Incidence and outcome of femoral vascular complications among 18,165 patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation

International Journal of Cardiology, 2009

Background: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and arterial pseudoaneurysms (PSA) are potentially harmful complications of diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterisation. Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcome are not well defined yet, although important for stratification and treatment. Methods: A total of 18,165 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation were enrolled in our prospective registry. For the diagnosis of AVF and PSA a clinical examination was performed in every patient followed by a Duplex examination in case of clinical suspicion of AVF/PSA. The impact of the following risk factors was assessed: age, body mass index, puncture of left vs. right groin, gender, hypertension, sheath size, peripheral artery disease, coumadin therapy, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitors, pre-treatment with thrombolytics, and emergency procedures. Results: Within 3 years a total of 334 complications were found (1.8%). The incidence of AVF and PSA was 0.6% (n = 107) and 1.2% (n = 227), respectively. The following significant independent risk factors were identified: arterial hypertension (odds ratio [OR]) = 1.86, female gender (OR = 1.65), and emergency procedures (OR = 2.13). During follow-up (mean 48 ± 10 months) only 11% of all AVF underwent operative repair due to symptoms. All PSA could be treated successfully either by manual compression, thrombin injection, or surgery. The overall mortality was 0.8%. Conclusion: Almost 2% of patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation acquire femoral AVF or PSA, for which patient-or procedure-related risk factors could be identified. Most of AVF and PSA could be managed conservatively or without any treatment, the overall mortality is low.

Incidence of Vascular Injuries after Use of the Angio-Seal Closure Device following Endovascular Procedures in a Single Center

World Journal of Surgery, 2006

Introduction: Percutaneous closure devices have been used to obtain rapid hemostasis and early mobilization of the patient after arterial catheterization. However, we observed challenging problems with the sealing procedure that require further surgical intervention. The present report is a retrospective analysis of the patterns of injury and the final outcome of four cases of femoral artery injury following the use of Angio-Seal. Methods: During the last 24 months, in a group of 175 patients (131 men, 44 women; median age 68.4 years, range 47-81 years) underwent percutaneous closure after diagnostic (n = 53) or therapeutic (n = 122) endovascular procedures. Among them we observed four patients (three men, one woman; median age 65.2 -10.8 years, range 47-75 years) who developed severe limiting claudication and required vascular repair of an iatrogenic vascular injury following deployment of the Angio-Seal. They had a femoral thrombosis due to narrowing/severe intimal dissection. Results: All patients required operative intervention with removal of the device. We performed femoropopliteal thrombectomy and common femoral endarterectomy with patch angioplasty (n = 2), resection of the femoral bifurcation and reimplantation of the deep femoral artery (n = 1), and femoral bifurcation endarterectomy with direct arterial suture (n = 1). The median hospital stay was 6.5 -3.8 days (range 4-12 days). Limb salvage was achieved in all of the surviving patients at a mean follow-up of 7 months (range 1-12 months). Conclusions: Vascular injuries are uncommon after use of the hemostasis closure device. When they occur, however, they are likely to require challenging surgical correction.

Efficacy of Femoral Vascular Closure Devices in Patients Treated with Anticoagulant, Abciximab or Thrombolytics during Percutaneous Endovascular Procedures

Korean Journal of Radiology, 2006

Objective: This study assessed the outcomes of using vascular closure devices following percutaneous transfemoral endovascular procedures in the patients who were treated with heparin, abciximab or thrombolytics (urokinase or t-PA) during the procedures. , we conducted a prospective and randomized study in which 1,676 cases of 1,180 patients were treated with one of the two different closure devices (the collagen plug device was Angio-Seal TM ; the suture-mediated closure device was The Closer S TM ) at the femoral access site after instituting percutaneous endovascular procedures. Among the 1,676 cases, 108 cases (the drug group) were treated with heparin only (n = 94), thrombolytics only (n = 10), heparin and thrombolytics (n = 3), or abciximab and thrombolytics (n = 1) during the procedures; 1,568 cases (the no-drug group) were treated without any medication. We compared the efficacy and complications between the two groups. Of the drug group, 42 cases underwent arterial closures with the collagen plug devices and 66 cases underwent arterial closures with the suture-mediated closure devices. We also compared the efficacy and complications between these two groups.