Higher plants light harvesting proteins. Structure and function as revealed by mutation analysis of either protein or chromophore moieties (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1999
The chromophore binding properties of the higher plant light-harvesting complex II have been studied by site-directed mutagenesis of pigment-binding residues. Mutant apoproteins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and then refolded in vitro with purified chromophores to yield holoproteins selectively affected in chlorophyll-binding sites. Biochemical and spectroscopic characterization showed a specific loss of pigments and absorption spectral forms for each mutant, thus allowing identification of the chromophores bound to most of the binding sites. On these bases a map for the occupancy of individual sites by chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b is proposed. In some cases a single mutation led to the loss of more than one chromophore indicating that four chlorophylls and one xanthophyll could be bound by pigment-pigment interactions. Differential absorption spectroscopy allowed identification of the Q y transition energy level for each chlorophyll within the complex. It is shown that not only site selectivity is largely conserved between light-harvesting complex II and CP29 but also the distribution of absorption forms among different protein domains, suggesting conservation of energy transfer pathways within the protein and outward to neighbor subunits of the photosystem. The abbreviations used are: Chl, chlorophyll; CP, chlorophyll protein; LHCII, light-harvesting complex of photosystem II; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; WT, wild type.
Pigment-binding properties of mutant light-harvesting chlorophyll-a/b-binding protein
European Journal of Biochemistry, 1992
Light-harvesting chlorophyll-alb-binding protein (LHCP), overexpressed in Escherichia coli, can be reconstituted with pigments to yield complexes that are structurally very similar to light-harvesting complex I1 (LHCII) isolated from thylakoids [Paulsen, H., Riimler, U. & Rudiger, W. (1990) Planta 181, 204-2111. In order to analyze which domains of the protein are involved in pigment binding, we reconstituted deletion mutants of LHCP with pigments and characterized the resulting complexes regarding their pigment composition and spectroscopic properties. Series of progressive deletions from either end of the protein revealed that most of the N-terminal and part of the C-terminal hydrophilic regions of LHCP are dispensible for pigment binding. In either deIetion series, the deletions that completely abolished reconstitution could be narrowed down to segments of five amino acids that do not contain histidine, asparagine, or glutamine. All mutants either formed complexes with both pigment composition and spectroscopic properties very similar to those of light-harvesting complex I1 isolated from thylakoids, or they did not form any stable complexes at all. There is no indication of a segment of LHCP binding a subset of LHCII pigments. We conclude that the stabilization of LHCP-pigment complexes is highly synergetic rather than based on individual pigment-binding sites provided by the protein.
Pigments induce folding of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein
European Journal of Biochemistry, 1993
The conformational behaviour of the light-harvesting chlorophyll &-binding protein (LHCP), the apoprotein of the major light-harvesting complex (LHCII) of photosystem I1 in plants, has been studied. According to the circular dichroism in the ultraviolet range measured with isolated LHCII, the protein in the complex adopts a folded structure with a high content of a helix (about 60%), whereas the non-pigmented, solubilized protein has a less ordered structure (about 20% a helix). LHCP-pigment complexes that have been reconstituted from the overexpressed protein and isolated pigments in the presence of detergents display a protein CD signal similar to that of authentic LHCII, indicating that LHCP folds into the native structure during the reconstitution procedure. Renaturation of LHCP in these experiments is dependent on the presence of pigments and the formation of stable LHCP-pigment complexes. Pigment-induced engagement of LHCP in a compact structure has also been shown by two additional experimental approaches. (a) Upon complex formation, LHCP or its precursor (pLHCP) becomes resistant to trypsin digestion with the exception of an N-terminal segment of the protein; the same protection of LHCP is known to occur in intact thylakoids. (b) Pigment binding renders a cysteine residue within the N-proximal hydrophobic domain of the protein as well as a newly introduced cysteine four amino acid positions from the C terminus inaccessible to modification with a sulfhydryl-specific label whereas the N terminus stays susceptible to specific labelling. These observations support the notion that only the N terminus protrudes from a compact protein-pigment structure in LHCII. The fact that the major part of LHCP is trypsin-resistant in pigmented complexes reconstituted in the absence of a membrane or even lipids justifies caution in using protection against trypsin as a criterion for the integration of LHCP into the thylakoid membrane. The efficiency of photosynthesis is greatly enhanced by antenna or light-harvesting complexes which collect light energy and transduce it to the photosynthetic reaction centers. The most prominent antenna in higher plants is the major light-harvesting complex of photosystem I1 (LHCII) comprising about half of the total chlorophyll in the thylakoid membrane. LHCII consists of an apoprotein (LHCP) of 25-28 kDa and pigments, i.e. 14 or 15 molecules chlorophyll a and b and 2-4 molecules xanthophyll bound/protein monomer (Bassi et al., 1990; Peter and Thornber, 1991). These pigments are non-covalently bound to the apoprotein. Little is known about the molecular interactions between protein and pigments. The light-harvesting function of LHCII requires that captured light quanta must be rapidly transferred between pigments within an antenna to be efficiently delivered at a reaction center (Sauer, 1986). Very rapid energy transfer between antenna chlorophylls has been measured by
Biochemistry, 2005
We have investigated the structure of the higher plant light harvesting complex of photosystem I (LHCI) by analyzing PSI-LHCI particles isolated from a set of Arabidopsis plant lines, each lacking a specific Lhca (Lhca1-4) polypeptide. Functional antenna size measurements support the recent finding that there are four Lhca proteins per PSI in the crystal structure [Ben-Shem, A., Frolow, F., and Nelson, N. (2003) Nature 426, 630-635]. According to HPLC analyses the number of pigment molecules bound within the LHCI is higher than expected from reconstitution studies or analyses of isolated native LHCI. Comparison of the spectra of the particles from the different lines reveals chlorophyll absorption bands peaking at 696, 688, 665, and 655 nm that are not present in isolated PSI or LHCI. These bands presumably originate from "gap" or "linker" pigments that are cooperatively coordinated by the Lhca and/or PSI proteins, which we have tentatively localized in the PSI-LHCI complex.
Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1993
In order to identify segments of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (LHCP) that are important for pigment binding, we have tested various LHCP mutants regarding their ability to form stable pigment-protein complexes in an in vitro reconstitution assay. Deletion of 10 C-terminal amino acids in the LHCP precursor, pLHCP, did not significantly affect pigment binding, whereas deletion of one additional amino acid, a tryptophan, completely abolished the formation of stable pigment-protein complexes. This tryptophan, however, can be exchanged with other amino acids in full-length pLHCP without noticeably altering the stability or spectroscopic properties of pigment complexes made with these mutants. Thus, the tryptophan residue is not likely to be involved in a highly specific interaction stabilizing the complex. A double mutant of LHCP lacking 66 N-terminal and 6 C-terminal amino acids still forms pigmented complexes that are virtually identical to those formed with the full-length protein concerning their pigment composition and spectroscopic properties. We conclude that about 30% of the polypeptide chain in LHCP is not involved in pigment binding.
Functional architecture of the major light-harvesting complex from higher plants
Journal of Molecular Biology, 2001
Light-harvesting complexes (Lhc) catalyse sunlight harvesting for photosynthesis as well as other essential functions, including photoprotection by quenching of harmful chlorophyll triplet states and prevention of photoinhibition by dissipation of excitation energy in excess. In addition, folding of Lhc proteins depends on the availability of both xanthophylls and carotenoids, thus preventing the potential formation of harmful chlorophyll-protein complexes lacking photoprotectors. We have used the mutation analysis in order to study the association of the different functions to three protein domains, each composed of a xanthophyll molecule and of neighbour chlorophylls a and b, within the major antenna complex of photosystem II, i.e. LHCII. We have found that the xanthophyll to chlorophyll energy transfer is a shared property of the whole pigmentprotein complex, and occurs with similar ef®ciency in each of the three structural domains. Photoprotection by quenching of chlorophyll triplets is catalysed mainly by lutein bound to site L1, and occurs via energy transfer from chlorophylls A1 and B1. This domain is essential for pigment-induced protein folding.
J Mol Biol, 2001
Light-harvesting complexes (Lhc) catalyse sunlight harvesting for photosynthesis as well as other essential functions, including photoprotection by quenching of harmful chlorophyll triplet states and prevention of photoinhibition by dissipation of excitation energy in excess. In addition, folding of Lhc proteins depends on the availability of both xanthophylls and carotenoids, thus preventing the potential formation of harmful chlorophyll-protein complexes lacking photoprotectors. We have used the mutation analysis in order to study the association of the different functions to three protein domains, each composed of a xanthophyll molecule and of neighbour chlorophylls a and b, within the major antenna complex of photosystem II, i.e. LHCII. We have found that the xanthophyll to chlorophyll energy transfer is a shared property of the whole pigmentprotein complex, and occurs with similar ef®ciency in each of the three structural domains. Photoprotection by quenching of chlorophyll triplets is catalysed mainly by lutein bound to site L1, and occurs via energy transfer from chlorophylls A1 and B1. This domain is essential for pigment-induced protein folding.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
We have characterized a xanthophyll binding site, called V1, in the major light harvesting complex of photosystem II, distinct from the three tightly binding sites previously described as L1, L2, and N1. Xanthophyll binding to the V1 site can be preserved upon solubilization of the chloroplast membranes with the mild detergent dodecyl-␣-D-maltoside, while an IEF purification step completely removes the ligand. Surprisingly, spectroscopic analysis showed that when bound in this site, xanthophylls are unable to transfer absorbed light energy to chlorophyll a. Pigments bound to sites L1, L2, and N1, in contrast, readily transfer energy to chlorophyll a. This result suggests that this binding site is not directly involved in light harvesting function. When violaxanthin, which in normal conditions is the main carotenoid in this site, is depleted by the de-epoxidation in strong light, the site binds other xanthophyll species, including newly synthesized zeaxanthin, which does not induce detectable changes in the properties of the complex. It is proposed that this xanthophyll binding site represents a reservoir of readily available violaxanthin for the operation of the xanthophyll cycle in excess light conditions.
Chlorophyll Binding to Monomeric Light-harvesting Complex
1999
The chromophore binding properties of the higher plant light-harvesting complex II have been studied by site-directed mutagenesis of pigment-binding residues. Mutant apoproteins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and then refolded in vitro with purified chro- mophores to yield holoproteins selectively affected in chlorophyll-binding sites. Biochemical and spectro- scopic characterization showed a specific loss of pig- ments and absorption spectral forms
European Journal of Biochemistry, 1999
A spectroscopic characterization is presented of the minor photosystem II chlorophyll a/b‐binding protein CP29 (or the Lhcb4 protein) from spinach, prepared by a modified form of a published protocol [Henrysson, T., Schroder, W. P., Spangfort, M. & Akerlund, H.‐E. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta977, 301–308]. The isolation procedure represents a quicker, cheaper means of isolating this minor antenna protein to an equally high level of purity to that published previously. The pigment‐binding protein shows similarities to other related light‐harvesting complexes (LHCs), including the bulk complex LHCIIb but more particularly another minor antenna protein CP26 (Lhcb5). It is also, in the main, similar to other preparations of CP29, although some significant differences are discussed. In common with CP26, the protein binds about six chlorophyll a and two chlorophyll b molecules. Two chlorophyll b absorption bands are present at 638 and 650 nm and they are somewhat more pronounced than in ...