Co-designing the city (original) (raw)
Related papers
On the ground: Reflections on the Deutsche Bank Urban Age Award
Living in the Endless City, 2011
This chapter reviews urban interventions in Mumbai, Sao Paulo, Istanbul and Mexico City. It argues against trends in urban knowledge transfer that looks to the spectacular, expensive and oft repeated symbols of twenty-first century urbanism. Instead it argues that if we widen our analytic lens to those very small, and locally embedded projects and actors, and take seriously the implications of their work, then we might find surprising alternatives to some of the most routinely expounded urban best practice.
Transforming Cities by Designing with Communities
The Hackable City, 2018
The Adaptive Governance Lab at the School of Architecture at University of Limerick has been working collaboratively with local government officials and community activists on action research projects co-designing with communities in neighbourhoods, villages and city districts in various locations in Ireland since 2010. The collaboration model developed is a genuine example of 'hackable city-making', where the local communities are involved in designing specific solutions for improving liveability in their areas, with the involvement and support of local government. A 'Designing with Communities' framework has emerged from the process in the 5 years of practice this chapter refers to. This has led to the need to refine the characterisation of the time frame, the methodologies, the commitments required from participants, the financial costs associated with the process, the advantages and disadvantages of engagement as well as the replicability of the process across cultures and governmental systems. Our chapter documents that ongoing process, defines the emerging structure of the framework, reflects on the value and risks of the process that has been carried out to date in terms of its usefulness as an urban management tool and active learning tool and proposes ways in which the framework can be adapted to fit into the developing community engagement structures of both academia and local government in Ireland.
Strategic Design Research Journal, 2020
Urban transformations depend on the uses of the city by old and new citizens and on their relation within spaces and resources, triggering regenerative opportunities, networking and empowerment processes. Considering the city and its heritage as a common good, in which each citizen could access and play for the knowledge, management, conservation and transformation of urban contexts, the contribute illustrates the results of experimental actions in Bologna (IT) finalized to test new stakeholder engagement processes and to develop new tools for participatory practices and new productions for the reactivation of the city. In the last years Bologna represents a field of experimentation for different forms of collaborative approaches with the aim to test and innovate tools and policies for the public space. The paper presents the results of projects linked to EU funding schemes (ROCK project) and local multi-stakeholder initiatives (Bologna Design Week) which are part of the research and experimentation carried out by the research unit team. This article illustrates a model to improve the regenerative capacities of the city, recognizing and matching the different roles, influences and knowledge of actors and relevant stakeholders, to strengthen communities' sense of belonging, cultural and creative power, and improving territorial identity.
2021
Connecting to Global Agendas "All cities aim to increase prosperity, promote social inclusion, and enhance resilience and environmental sustainability" (SDSN, 2016, p. 21). This chapter brings together some of the lessons drawn from previous chapters-the case studies, practice stories and the framework for inter-and transdisciplinary processes with three global agendas and their aspirations. Firstly, the New Urban Agenda (NUA); secondly the UN 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifcally goal no. 11 on Sustainable Cities and Communities and no. 4 on obtaining a quality education; and thirdly the Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) initiative led by the United Nations Educational, Scientifc and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). A key requirement of these global agendas is the need to be adaptable and local, which depends on the enhancement of capacities for "participatory, integrated and sustainable" planning and management. 1 Implementing international, national and even regional policies and plans into the specifc realities of cities and towns locally, is often problematic. Turning globally conceived agendas local means enabling interconnected and sustainable urban knowledge, and giving voice and legitimacy to a multiplicity of agencies, worldviews, ways of knowing and understanding the problems and the possibility for alternative ways of doing things. We question how to localise the global agenda, in relation to the specifc targets of the SDG on Sustainable Cities and Communities to "enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries" and explore the contribution of inter-and transdisciplinary processes to this. We then FIGURE IV.3.1 Connecting and prioritizing themes. Workshop in Belgrade 2017. Photo by Josefne Fokdal.
The Collaborative City. How to develop urban project considering expanded and inedited fields
2018
This paper draws a link between citizens’ initiative, architectural practice and architectural education. The core of this research focuses on “bottom-up” design processes, which may illustrate the paradigm of an inedited “collaborative city” characterized by a wider stakeholders’ involvement. The first part defines the theoretical conditions for a new paradigm, “a new system of values, that illustrate a new representation of the world, in a new coherent system” by analysing a corpus of recent completions where stakeholders’ status, type of financing and duration reverse the traditional “topdown” process of designing projects. But those examples don’t identify the architect as the central character of this inedited process, that’s why the second part of this “retroactive research” paper develops personal project where the architect gathers various disciplines within an integrative process of design, where the collaborative economy acts as a generator to face the velocity of urban de...
Explorations in Urban Practice
Explorations in Urban Practice. Urban School Ruhr Series, 2017
Both a learning platform and a pedagogical experiment, Urban School Ruhr is built upon the foundational belief that experts and amateurs can, together, build a space of critical exchange and knowledge transfer. USR prioritises exchange and dialogue that is not necessarily attached to specific outcomes, results or interventions in built reality, instead understanding conversation as the first step to co-producing cities. Explorations in Urban Practice, the first edition in the Urban School Ruhr Series, draws from and reflects upon USR’s experiences to date whilst also looking to the future of urban practice in contemporary cities. The book presents the reader with key current questions in the field: how can we learn city making? How should we understand the political concept of commoning for this purpose? And how can we discuss intervention as a strategy for enacting urban change? With contributions from: Juan Chacón, Dirk Baecker, Merve Bedir, Pablo Calderón Salazar, Bianca Elzenbaumer and Fabio Franz, Benjamin Foerster-Baldenius, Silke Helfrich, George Kafka, Valentina Karga, Gilly Karjevsky, Hannes Langguth, Laura Lovatel, Torange Khonsari and Andreas Lang, Marjetica Potrc, Anna Giulia della Puppa, Julia Udall, Sam Vardy, Sabine Zahn. Published by dpr-Barcelona >> Shortlisted for the Cornish Family Prize for Art and Design Publishing at the National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE CITIES-2019
The goals of planning are socioeconomic in nature where community participation is the essence of a democratic approach. A decision has to be made on the type of process, level of the citizen participation and its extent during a process for participation is decided. As the prevailing methods of public involvement in the planning and implementation process are limited. Participation is determined by the organizational structures in a local planning authority in both extent and effect. There is a felt need for a system like e-government tools that may provide urban local bodies and other parastatal agencies with a different means to notify and engage their citizenry. The present research attempts to explore the supremacy of simple, information-based, e-participation tools to enhance community participation with context to urban planning and development. The aim of this review is to improve the understanding of how e-participation approaches facilitate the urban redevelopment process; as a result, researchers can construct knowledge and choose the appropriate approaches to develop a framework. For this purpose, the authors reviewed the function of E-participation techniques in urban development as well as the rising challenges of community-level redevelopment projects. The study focus to provide innovative means of access to, and participation in redevelopment projects. The study assesses the potential that how web-enabled E-Participation can facilitate participatory planning. Authors conclude that, even though challenges exist, E-Participation approaches offer promising solutions for inclusive urban planning.