De Rebus Bellicis Numismatic Commentary (original) (raw)
Related papers
This paper gives the background to the collection of coin information published and used in the companion paper in Draft (Roman coin finds -- Britain, France, Germany, Italy). It may give useful information on how the material was collected and what were the condition of coin collections and museums in France and Italy in 1965-70.
This paper gathers together previously published parts and a new section on the Historia Augusta. It is mainly a list of references from texts with short discussion.
The Roman coinage in the 4 th and 5 th century AD
The Roman coinage in the 4 th and 5 th century AD, 2013
This paper is the last in a series of papers on Roman coins in which I express my views on the Roman monetary system covering a period of four centuries. Originally I published the information in a book on Roman coins written in Dutch. I decided to lift some parts out of the book, translate them into English and publish the information in the form of short articles on academia.edu.
The Classical Review, 2021
Numismatics has often been seen as a rather arcane and obscure discipline, which circuits like a satellite around the major planets of Classics, History and Archaeology. K. bookends this work by discussing a paper written by A.H.M. Jones, in 1956, in which he outlined what he thought was needed from numismatic research. This enables a succinct conclusion to the book, where K. is able to report that enormous strides have been made in the last 60 years, raising the profile of numismatics and showing its real importance to other branches of historical and archaeological research. Although the scope of this book is very broad, it is highly condensed, and so there is no room for any depth of discussion in this short review. At the outset, I can only strongly recommend that anyone with an interest in the Roman world should read this work. K. explains how coins can be used as both historical and archaeological sources, showing how more critical and quantitative methodologies have led to important developments in the assistance of both disciplines. She identifies two key themes: first, coins as a tool of political communication; second, the function of coins as monetary instruments. I believe that one should also add the nonmonetary functions of coins, such as in ritual.
An attempt to explain the difficulties of interpreting the full study of Roman coins