The Macedonian Expeditionary Corps in Asia Minor (336–335 BC) // Klio. Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte. 2018. Bd. 100. Ht. 2. Р. 407-446 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Roman Foreign Politics Ca.200 BC. The Causes of the Second Macedonian War.
Die Studie behandelt das Problem der Natur der römischen Außenpolitik und das sehr kontroverses Thema der Ursachen des Zweiten römisch-macedonischen Krieges. Um die innere Logik der römischen Außenpolitik zu verstehen, hat der Verfasser drei Modelle des Buches von G. Allison, The Essence of Decission ausgewählt und für das Altertum in der modifizierten Form ausgenütz. Das Forschungsresultat unterscheidet sich von den traditionellen Agression-oder Defension- Therorien, die in der Forschung zum Problem der römischen Außenpolitik formuliert werden.
The Hypaspist Corps: Evolution and Status of the Elite Macedonian Infantry Unit
"ARCHAEOLOGY AND SCIENCE" Journal, Published by: Center for New Technology Institute of Archaeology, University of Belgrade, 2019
The Hypaspist corps was an elite unit, most probably established by Philip II and inherited by Alexander the Great along with the other components of the Macedonian army. These troops were actively involved in every operation, be it pitched battle or light infantry mission, throughout the Asian campaign and with distinction, thus igniting the interest and curiosity of many scholars. However, in many respects, the nature of the corps remains elusive. The absence of contemporary literature together with the huge time gap to the most militarily literate source available, Arrian’s Anabasis of Alexander, combine with the evolving organisation and the restructuring of the Macedonian army under Alexander to shadow the facts. Before being reformed, as Argyraspides’ elite line infantry, the Corps, which was different from the two guard formations, fulfilled a double mission, had a wider choice of weaponry and tactics and was organised into three units, while retaining double the strength of the conventional phalanx formations, the Taxeis of sarissa-wielding line infantry. This paper aims to review some of the basic problems of this Corps’s identity, highlighting its origins, status, functional deployment, organisation, weaponry and evolution.
PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, 2009
Abstract This dissertation evaluates the significance of fortification building in Opountian Lokris as a testimony to specific strategic demands made by the Successors of Alexander III of Macedon on her territory. I argue that there is a link between largescale movements of Macedonian armies, installment of royal garrisons in Greek cities and the construction of artillery fortifications on a trans-regional scale. I examine this newly-emerging reality by looking at military power as a productive force, one that was transmitted horizontally through complex networks, and on different levels. Chapter One, Geography and routes, examines the various ways trans-regional traffic by land and by sea impacted the local landscape. Based on literary, epigraphic and archaeological data, I contextualize the available evidence for routes and types of travel through a region that continuously served as a land of passage and a port of call for Macedonian military shipping. Chapter Two, Towards the military history of a terra incognita, traces the military developments based on a critical survey of the pertinent literary and epigraphic sources. Life after Alexander demanded new social strategies, since many communities had to put up with the presence of Macedonian garrisons. Chapter Three, A Gazetteer of sites, forms the empirical base of the dissertation. A site-by-site diachronic survey of the fortifications known from topographical studies and archaeological excavation helps measure the amount of change witnessed during the Hellenistic period. Chapter Four, Mapping urban phrouria, reexamines the issue of function by assembling the available evidence for occupation within the fortified area. The impact of Macedonian garrisons is surprisingly substantial, as reflected in the emergence of artillery fortifications, modern urban planning, new burial practices and foreign religious cults. Chapter Five, Phrouria Lokrika: construction, chronology and function, inquires into who benefitted from their construction. An attempt is also made to reconstruct and quantify the various stages of building. Comparanda from other regions of mainland Greece, including the Black sea region, deepen our understanding of what has been hitherto perceived as a strictly regional enterprise.