Architectural Thought - The Design Process and the Expectant (original) (raw)
Related papers
Architectural Making: Between a "Space of Experience" and a "Horizon of Expectations
PhaenEx
The paper suggests that architectural making, a process of research in practice, and itself a bridging between the space of experience and the horizon of expectations, corresponds to phenomenology as a method of inquiry. This includes architectural phases parallel to epoché, phenomenological reduction, free variations, transcendental intuition of the essence, and description. The paper describes the in-between, its two edges, experience and expectations, and their mutual influences through the process of architectural making. Examples from the design studio and professional literature illustrate the argumentation. The in-between is presented as structured, notably having a depth—the ineffable origin of creativity. In conclusion, the paper suggests that the edges and the in-between are temporary configurations in flux, wherein the architect makes use of his/her most inner resources, as a contribution to the metamorphosis and revitalization of his/her culture.
The Construction of Architectural Ideas
PosFAUUSP
This work discusses how ideas are constructed in the design process of architecture projects, identifying what enables their emergence, development, selection and elimination. A qualitative and exploratory research method was used. The basic assumption is that ideas are mainly the result of knowledge, although influenced by subjective factors of the designer: criticism acts as a filter of ideation, thus governing the process of selection and disposal of ideas. Theories, assumptions and arguments of other researchers on the subject of creativity were confronted with the findings presented. This revealed a pattern in the construction of ideas during architectural design processes that puts into question the theory in which ideas arise from the interaction between designers and their sketches.
On Paradigms & Avant Garde: Peeking into the Architectural Mind
Design Methods Vol.30, No.3, pp.2368-2396 , 1996
It has long been argued that tradition and originality constitute the main tensions driving the architectural mind. A critical review of this proposition reveals its limitations and dangers. A Model that uses the concept of paradigm is proposed as a more comprehensive construct for describing the meta-psychology of architectural design. The forces of convention and innovation are related to those of rationality and imagination and are made relative to paradigms. The general logic, boundary, and functioning of the designer's mind under these paradigms are described, paying close attention to the role of analysis and exemplars. Tradition is shown as the strongest force driving architectural design while avant garde as rare situations when the designer's thinking and doing are beyond the influences of paradigms. The paper concludes with recommendations for architectural education.
Architectural Hermeneutics: Architecture, Meaning and Art in Everyday Life, 1995
Chapter 4, Expectations of Architecture [with references], pp. 81-122. From … Missingham, Greg, 1995, Architectural Hermeneutics: Architecture, Meaning and Art in Everyday Life, [unpub] PhD, Parkville, VIC: Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne.