2012: ‘The Global Political Ecology of the CDM’, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 12 No.4 , pp.49-68 (with Adam Bumpus). (original) (raw)
Related papers
This article develops a political economy account of global environmental governance to improve upon our understanding of the contemporary conduct of environmental politics and to clarify thinking about the potential for, and barriers to, effective environmental reform. By elaborating the key contours of a political economy account on the one hand and opening up to critical enquiry prevailing understandings of what is meant by 'global' 'environmental' and 'governance' on the other, such an approach is able to enhance our understanding of the practice of environmental governance by emphasising historical, material and political elements of its (re) constitution and evolution.
Global Politics and the Environment (Review Essay)
Global Policy, 2014
Cambridge: Polity, 2013. 272 pp. £55 hardcover, 978 0 7456 6276 3; £17.99 paperback, 978 0 7456 6277 0 Globalization and the Environment: Capitalism, Ecology and Power by Peter Newell. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 224 pp. £55 hardcover, 978 0 7456 4722 7; £16.99 paperback, 978 0 7456 4723 4 China's Environmental Challenges by Judith Shapiro. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 200 pp. £50 hardcover, 978 0 7456 6090 5; £14.99 paperback, 978 0 7456 6091 2
Birgit Müller (editor) 2022 Political Ecology and Environmental Governance
LASA Forum 53:1, 2022
Political ecology, the encounter between the tradition of Latin American critical thought and the vast experiences and strategies of grassroots communities and Indigenous peoples in the face of plunder and despoliation, questions the established order and the institutions of this order. The study of power relations, crossing the socio-environmental field, has emerged in Latin America as a central interdisciplinary field for thinking about society/environment relations. Latin American critical thinking, which had as a reference a productivist vision of development and modernity, has opened up to the vast plurality of popular movements in search for autonomy and enhancement of rights, and to the unique and constitutive relationship that communities have with their local natures and territories. It implies a critical look at the rationality of state forms and their forms of internal colonialism; primitive accumulation; forms of subordination of the working class around the mining, extraction, and plantation economy; and at the appropriation of agro-biodiversity and ancestral knowledge by the “knowledge society.” How do contestations between knowledge systems and ways of being in the world come together with questions of environmental justice and injustice, class, race, and social costs to future generations when industrial production, infrastructure, and consumption destroy the very basis of urban and rural livelihoods: water, forests, and biodiversity? How does political ecology integrate the challenges posed by the new rivalry in the global economy?
Caminhos de Diálogo, 2020
Longitudinal scientific evidence proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the problem of climate change is reaching a point of no return, upon which Earthly and human survival depends. The major contributors of climate change include industry, transportation, agriculture, and consumers, over which corporate globalization controls, which consume fossil fuels, such as oil, coal, and gas that produce greenhouse gases. Climate change impacts access to clean water, human health, forests, coastal areas, biodiversity, and agriculture. Our tasks ahead include: 1) exposing and opposing flawed economic, political, social, cultural, and security models that destroy nature, cause mal-development, and widening the gap between the rich and the poor and 2) proposing new cooperative models that put sustainability and equality-nature and people-first, especially the poor and the oppressed, before profits. Keywords Climate. Greenhouse gas emissions. International political economy. Nature and society. Poverty. 1 Doutor em Direitos Humanos e Educação para a Construção da Paz. Mestre em Ciências Políticas e Estudos Asiáticos. Diretor executivo do Programa para a Construção da Paz da Conferência Cristã da Ásia e instrutor convidado no doutorado do
The Rescaling of Global Environmental Politics
Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2010
In the past half-century, the practice and study of global environmental politics and governance have been dramatically rescaled. They have become increasingly complex and interconnected with respect to the level (between local and global) at which they take place, the range of actors engaged in them, and the linkages between them and nominally nonenvironmental issues. Global environmental politics and governance have been rescaled vertically down toward provincial and municipal governments and up toward supranational regimes. They have also been rescaled horizontally across regional and sectoral organizations and networks and across new issues, such as development, security, and trade among others. This rescaling reflects shifts in the magnitude, complexity, and interconnectedness of the global environmental problems humans face as well as epistemological shifts in how humans understand and respond to these problems, and rescaling has implications for both the practice and study of global environmental politics.