Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
We describe postoperative functional outcome and accuracy of implant position in 38 cases after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford knee prosthesis with a standard open approach compared with 30 cases with a minimally invasive approach. Patients with the minimally invasive approach had significantly better functional results, with an average Hospital for Special Surgery scores of 92 (range, 81-98) compared with 78 (range, 24-99). Range of motion 1 year postoperatively was better in the minimally invasive group (113°vs 107°), but the results were not statistically significant. The number of patients with extension lag was significantly higher after the open approach. The minimal invasive approach had no negative effect on positioning of the prosthesis. In our opinion, minimally invasive implantation is the method of choice for the treatment of anteromedial osteoarthritis by unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2013
Accurate implant positioning and restoration of lower limb alignment are major requirements for successful long-term results in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Alignment accuracy was compared between navigated-UKA (nUKA) and conventional-UKA (cUKA) groups using a retrospective matched case-control study (n=129, 58 nUKA, 71 cUKA). Mechanical axis (MA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA°), coronal implant alignment, and tibial implant posterior slope were measured. No statistically significant difference was observed when comparing MA, HKA°or coronal implant alignment (pN0.05). Statistical significance was seen with tibial component posterior slope (p=0.04, nUKA 4.2°, cUKA 2.9°); and between intra-operative navigationally determined HKA°and post-operative whole-leg standing (WLS) film HKA°. Navigation does not significantly improve UKA alignment compared to conventional methods. Further studies are needed to justify the use of this technology in UKA.
Advances in orthopedics, 2013
Customized patient instrumentation (CPI) combines preoperative planning with customized cutting jigs to position and align implants during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared postoperative implant alignment of patients undergoing surgery with CPI to traditional TKA instrumentation for accuracy of implant placement. Twenty-five consecutive TKAs using CPI were analyzed. Preoperative CT scans of the lower extremities were segmented using a computer program. Limb alignment and mechanical axis were computed. Virtual implantation of computer-aided design models was done. Postoperative coronal and sagittal view radiographs were obtained. Using 3D image-matching software, relative positions of femoral and tibial implants were determined. Twenty-five TKAs implanted using traditional instrumentation were also analyzed. For CPI, difference in alignment from the preoperative plan was calculated. In the CPI group, the mean absolute difference between the planned and actual femoral placeme...
Current concepts for aligning knee implants: patient-specific or systematic?
EFORT Open Reviews, 2018
Mechanical or anatomical alignment techniques create a supposedly ‘biomechanically friendly’ but often functionally limited prosthetic knee. Alternative techniques for alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aim at being more anatomical and patient-specific, aiming to improve functional outcomes after TKA. The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for TKA has shown good early clinical outcomes. Its role in extreme anatomical variation remains to be defined. The restricted KA technique for TKA might be a reasonable option for patients with extreme anatomical variation. While unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has many advantages over TKA, the revision rate remains higher compared with TKA. One major explanation is the relative ease with which a UKA can be converted to a TKA, compared with revising a TKA. This can be considered as an additional advantage of UKA. Another reason is that surgeons favour revising a UKA to a TKA in cases of degeneration of the other femorotibial comp...
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2020
Background: The primary goal of many computer-assisted surgical systems like robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to accurately execute a preoperative plan. To assess whether the preoperative plan was executed accurately in 3D, one option is to compare the planned and postoperative implant placement using a preoperative and postoperative CT scan of the patient's limb. This comparison requires a 3D-to-3D surface registration between the preoperative and postoperative 3D bone models and between the planned and postoperative 3D implants. Hence, the present study aimed at validating this measurement technique by determining (I) the anatomical regions that result in the lowest 6-degree of freedom (DoF) errors for 3D-to-3D surface registration of bone models, (II) the 6-DoF errors for 3D-to-3D surface registration of the implant models, and (III) the 6-DoF of the complete measurement technique. Methods: Four different regions of the femur were tested to determine which one would result in the most accurate 3D-to-3D registration of the bone models using 12 cadaveric lower limb specimens. Next, total knee arthroplasties were performed on six specimens, and the accuracy of the 3D-to-3D implant registration was evaluated against a gold standard registration performed using fiducial markers. Results: The most accurate 3D-to-3D bone registration was obtained when using the largest anatomical regions available after TKA, being the full 3D femur model or the femur model without the distal femur which resulted in root mean square errors within 0.2 mm for translations and 0.2° for rotation. The accuracy of the 3D-to-3D femoral and tibial implant registration was within 0.7 mm for translations and 0.4°-0.6° for rotations, respectively. The accuracy for the overall procedure was within 0.9 mm and 0.6° for both femur and tibia when using femoral regions resulting in accurate 3D-to-3D bone registration. Conclusions: In conclusion, this measurement technique can be used in applications where measurement errors up to 0.9 mm in translations and up to 0.6° in rotations in component placement are acceptable.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2019
BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare restoration of mechanical limb alignment and three-dimensional component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.MethodsRadiographic data of patients undergoing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (n= 1257), using either conventional (n= 442) or patient-specific instrumentation (n= 812), were analyzed. To evaluate accuracy of axis restoration and 3D-component-positioning between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation, absolute deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical limb alignment and planned implant positions were determined. Measurements were performed on standardized coronal long-leg and sagittal knee radiographs. CT-scans were evaluated for accuracy of axial femoral implant rotation. Outliers were defined as deviations from the targeted neutral mechanical axis of > ± 3° or from the intraoperative component-positioning goals of > ± 2°. Deviations...
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
The aim of this study was to analyze first intraoperative alignment and reason to abandon the use of patient-specific instrumentation using intraoperative CAS measurement, secondly assess by postoperative CT analysis if CI, based on preoperative 3D-MRI data, improved postoperative component positioning (including femoral rotation) and lower limb alignment as compared with results obtained with CAS. In this randomized controlled trial, 80 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo TKA were enrolled. Eligible knees were randomized to the group of PSI-TKAs (n = 40) or to the group of CAS-TKAs (n = 40). In the CAS group, CAS determined and controlled cutting block positioning in each plane. In the PSI group, CAS allowed to measure adequacy of intraoperative alignment including femoral component rotation. At 3 months after surgery, implants position were measured and analyzed with full-weight bearing plain radiographs and CT scan. Intraoperatively, there was a significant difference conce...
Computer Assisted Surgery
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is a minimally-invasive surgical procedure for treating isolated compartmental knee osteoarthritis. Accurate implant placement is crucial for a successful UKA procedure. Previous work has shown the improvement in UKA by using robotic systems. Here, we present the implant alignment accuracy of a hand-held robotic UKA system compared with a conventional manual UKA system for 12 cadaver specimens. Two surgeons carried out equal number of medial UKAs with robotic UKA on one knee and the manual UKA on the other knee. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for each cadaveric model. The final implant positions were identified in the postoperative CT scan. The implant orientations were compared with the planned implant positions to obtain femoral and tibial implant alignment errors. Our results show that the femoral flexion, varus, and rotation root mean square errors for the robotic and conventional approach were 1.23 , 2.81 , 1.62 and 7.52 , 6.25 , 5.0 , respectively. The tibial slope and varus errors for the robotic and conventional approaches were 2.41 , 2.96 and 4.06 , 1.8 , respectively. We did not find any statistical significant difference (p ¼ .05) in the performance of the two surgeons. We conclude that the handheld robotic UKA system offers significant improvement in the final implant placement