THE CELL, THE FIELD, AND THE TOWER: THE SPACES OF ECOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS (original) (raw)
Related papers
From Cybernetics to an Architecture of Ecology
2020
This article discusses the impact of systems thinking and cybernetics on architectural design by examining the example of the Inter-Action Centre (1970–1977) of British architect Cedric Price. The centre reflects Price's view of architecture as part of an extensive social and environmental system, or ecology, that influences the inhabitants' mutual interactions and their relationship with their physical surroundings. Emphasising the link between material resources, technology and individual action, the project design implied a change both in the understanding of architecture and the architect's role: from the designer of present-day artifacts to the designer of system interventions. Influenced by the cybernetician Gordon Pask, the systems theorist Buckminster Fuller, and the biologist and town planner Patrick Geddes, Price developed a relational approach in which architecture functions as an instrument of change within a larger system such as the city, neighbourhood or r...
Environments (out) of Control: Notes on Architecture’s Cybernetic Entanglements
Footprint, 2021
This article examines the contradictory circuits of (neo)cybernetics in contemporary architectural and urbanistic discourse by reframing them within the ‘environmentalitarian’ epoch. Cybernetics is today simultaneously exalted as a liberatory mechanism for designing emergence, complexity and open-endedness, and constitutive of an indiscernible mode of decentralised, environmentally modulated control. The history of cyberneticisation has received renewed attention as the key catalyst for environmentalisation, and as the predominant control paradigm underlying late-capitalist Environmentality. Given the profound spatial implications of this trajectory, understanding architecture’s own cybernetic entanglements is a much-needed step towards a critical revaluation of environmentality. The article thus maps the cybernetic imaginary ‘at large’ across architecture – alongside landscape architecture and urbanism – under various guises such as adaptation, responsiveness, cultivation, resilience or conversation. By probing the salient characteristics of these approaches, their problematic proximity to the logic of cybernetic capitalism is contextualised in relation to the broader ontological and ontopolitical questions of the Anthropocene era. The article concludes by tracing possible conceptual trajectories amid and beyond the restrictive circuits of Environmentality: from adaptation to contingency, via Yuk Hui’s proposal for a cosmopolitics grounded in affirmative fortuity; and from responsiveness to response-ability, via Donna Haraway’s experimental material-semiotics of sympoiesis.
Angelaki, 2020
This article investigates the relation between machine and ecology, and the philosophical and historical questions concealed in these two seemingly incompatible terms. The opposition between machine and organism was fundamental to philosophical projects since the eighteenth century. However, the emergence of cybernetics in the first half of the twentieth century proposed a unified logic which transcended the dualism between machine and organism, or technics and nature, and therefore also the opposition between machine and ecology. Cybernetics poses a limit to philosophy, which Heidegger called the end of philosophy, and also a challenge for thinking. If the promises of cybernetics are effective, does it suggest also that cybernetics is the way out of modernity? Or is it rather, as we want to suggest here, that after cybernetics it is no longer a dualism which is the source of danger in our epoch, but rather a non-dualistic totalizing power present in modern technology? If one cannot simply oppose machine and ecology, we demand a political ecology of machines, which will center on the concept of technodiversity, in the sense of a systematic approach for understanding the history and plurality of cosmotechnics and their diverging futures by revisiting the question of locality.
Citation. Perera, S. V. D.. (2017). Architectures of coevolution : second- order cybernetics and architectural theories of the environment, c. 1959-2013. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong. Kong SAR. Issued Date. 2017. This dissertation offers a historical and theoretical analysis of Heinz von Foerster’s Biological Computer Laboratory (BCL) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and its little-known, yet pivotal role, within the broader postwar history of environmentalism. It provides a critical examination of the work carried out on self-organizing systems at the BCL and its related publications while correlating it with educational experiments, design projects and similar philosophies from the same period. The dissertation proposes that Heinz von Foerster and the constellation of researchers that came together at the BCL from fields as diverse as cognitive sciences to arts and architecture need to be reconsidered as progenitors of a coevolutionary approach towards the theorizing of the environment. Conservation oriented models of environmentalism to this date uses first-order cybernetic notions of information feedback loops and machines in a positivistic way to trivialize the environment in order to maintain. In contrast, coevolutionary logic premised on second-order cybernetic theories invites change and deals with complex, far from equilibrium conditions that characterize living systems. At the core of coevolutionary logic are explorations of the concept of learning within the broader context of system/environment frameworks. In short; environmentalism maintains, coevolution learns. The study traces how information theoretical concepts premised on BCL’s experiments on the bio-logic of self-organizing systems were appropriated by figures such as Serge Chermayeff (coevolution=community), Gordon Pask (coevolution=conversation), Ranulph Glanville (coevolution=freedom), and Francisco Varela (coevolution=interbeing) within the context of the broader ecological frameworks. Collectively their projects placed more emphasis on finding alternative ways to problematize the environment as opposed to solving environmental problems making their work more influential within the context of education, more specifically architectural education. Through mapping these intertwining histories the contribution of this dissertation is threefold: to map out this vital discourse historically; to place the second-order cybernetic project within the broader history of environmentalism in architecture; and to demonstrate the significance of the extended field of postwar laboratory networks as sites of continuing relevance to architecture's search for alternative heuristic models that are better suited to problematizing the environment in the Anthropocene.
Five Points Towards an Architecture In-Formation
Footprint Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 2021
While there have been significant discussions about the relevance of cybernetics within architectural and urban studies, the focus has mainly been on computing and digital practices. Since its emergence in the post-war period, cybernetics – in both its first and second-order versions – has introduced to architectural discourse systematic design methods and practices, while also tackling issues of reflexivity and complex problems. In this introduction, we examine the relation between cybernetics and architecture by focusing on a problem they both share. To this end, we approach cybernetics as the study of the production, consumption and flow of information, an account that has little to do with digital logics, unless one wants to pursue that special case. Therefore, cyberneticisation can set the foundations for a relational account that examines how signs are communicated and how meaning is produced and experienced within systems. This third-order cybernetics extends beyond the original scope of living organisms and their environments in order to include ecologies of ideas, power, institutions, media and so on. In this sense, cyberneticisation is radically environmental, positing the primacy of relations over fixed terms, binary oppositions and linear logics, making it high time for architectural and urban studies to take into consideration its ground-breaking potentials. By introducing five short points on the relation between architecture and cybernetics, we aim to assist in this endeavour.
Cyberneticisation as a Theory and Practice of Matter
2020
The ecological implementation of cybernetic ideas in architecture requires a material theory and practice that enables their propositions to be tested. The need for approaches that move from simulation to cybernetic reality is a documented limitation of cybernetics recognised by Stafford Beer with his pond ecology experiments and Gordon Pask through electrochemical devices. While both experimented with adaptive material platforms as embodiments of designed cybernetic systems, their approaches were limited by the available toolsets. This article considers an ecological trajectory of cybernetisation by revisiting notions of biological computation as a generative material practice. In particular, the growing fields of biodesign and living architecture go beyond notions of biological analogues that inform modern architecture by directly incorporating living systems into the very fabric of buildings as designed expressions of ecology.
More Notes on the Debate About the Cybernetics of Architecture
2016
Dando por hecho que lo digital se ha impuesto en todos los ámbitos de la vida contemporánea, en este trabajo se pretende reflexionar sobre su verdadero alcance en el terreno del dibujo y el proyecto de arquitectura, y en especial en el mundo académico. Se sostiene que, en las escuelas de arquitectura de nuestro país, el dibujo y el proyecto siguen prácticas muy establecidas, admitiéndose el uso del CAD de forma instrumental, pero sin acceder a explorar sus mas profundas dimensiones en el campo de la ideación, del proyecto, de la comunicación y de la construcción. A partir del debate más contemporáneo sobre conceptos muy desarrollados ya en el mundo investigador y académico anglosajón, se propone avanzar en un uso integral del dibujo por ordenador –estudiándolo como proceso y no como resultado–, un uso para el que las nuevas generaciones parecen estar naturalmente dotadas. Palabras clave: Arquitectura; Dibujo; Digital; Virtual;
SITES, 2020
The dialectic supported in "An EcoMarxist Cast on Biointelligent Architectures" is a scaffold for thinking about and designing bioremediating, metabolic architectures. It is a design/theory hypothesis positing that biological intelligences (microbes/plants) will be hybridized in the upcoming years with matter and AI in order to expand the materialization and performance of buildings and cities. As a system of conjecture, the theory forges and illustrates ways-of-seeing, conceptualizing, and simulating bioarchitectural research/practice by factoring in nature’s non-neurological intelligences as parallel and compatible with human/animal cognition, intelligence, and agency. Underpinning a design methodology looking to technology and science, the text searches emerging concepts of global reforestation, microbial/plant communications, architectural forensics, and ecodialectics to morphologically generate bioactive, intelligent buildings. The text furthermore looks to mycorrhizal and microbial communications for linkages with biochemical signaling and resource sharing, which, when decrypted, will further the abilities of bioremedial buildings/infrastructures to communicate with natural systems. Toward the above goals, the essay encourages dialectics in the form of design concepts and architectural forensics that explore bio-philosophical autopoiesis and ecoMarxist theory/praxis. By citing recent scholarship in the biosciences of tree/soil communication and microbe/plant intelligence and syncing them with philosophy, biocomputation, and ecological justice, "An EcoMarxist Cast on Biointelligent Architectures" unfolds research, practices, and models for exploring design. Ultimately, it argues that collaboration with biointelligent microbes, plants, and ecosystems (e.g. forests) should be recognized in terms of labor and accorded rights and protections as nature’s work force. These laboring forces include human cognition and its resulting social technology that reveal uncharted roles for urban and architectural bioremediation as components of nature, here conscripted to support environmental clean up.
The Socio-Temporary in Architecture: Territories of Second-Order Cybernetics
2012
The temporary in architecture is a state of territorial instability that emerges out of interactions between transdisciplinary narratives and architectural theory and its practice. This article extends this notion to the socio-temporary, which is a state arising from constant synergies between the social context and worldmaking. Such narratives were originally influenced by the field of cybernetics and later on by second-order cybernetics reflected in the emergent participatory art practice of the mid-twentieth century through transdisciplinary research. Derived from the theoretical underpinning of this article a simulation is exhibited, which illustrates theoretically elements of Varela and Maturana’s autopoietic system behaviour and its close relation to temporality in the worldmaking of architecture. This is a theoretical article – with an element of practice – that seeks to highlight the temporality of the process of worldmaking in architecture. Key Words: Architectural theory, Socio-temporary, Socio-Conscious, Second-Order Cybernetics, Worldmaking, Becoming, Situations