Beastly contractarianism? A contractarian analysis of the possibility of animal rights (original) (raw)

This paper explores the philosophical debate surrounding the moral status of animals through a contractarian lens, contrasting the perspectives of utilitarianism and rights-based approaches. It argues that while utilitarianism provides a framework for animal consideration based on pleasure and pain, it often leads to sacrifices for the greater good, which conflicts with rights-based views that emphasize inviolability. Additionally, the paper examines the implications of granting direct moral standing to animals, considering issues such as moral status, differential treatment, and the potential benefits of establishing contracts with animals. Ultimately, it raises critical questions about the feasibility and desirability of contractarian arguments in the context of animal rights.