The Brazilian Presidential Elections and 'The Rules of the Game' (original) (raw)
Related papers
Political Reversals in Brazil: The Redemption of Lula and the Decline of Bolsonaro
Polidemos 10: Latin America at a Glance, Recent Political and Electoral Trends, 2024
This paper examines the profound political shifts in Brazil between 2018 and 2023, focusing on the contrasting trajectories of Jair Bolsonaro and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. In 2018, Bolsonaro rose to power in the wake of a weakened left, while Lula faced imprisonment. Fast forward to 2023, Lula has reclaimed the presidency, whereas Bolsonaro confronts a series of legal inquiries. The paper unfolds in two parts: the first segment traces Lula’s journey, examining the achievements of his initial terms marked by emancipatory populist politics, economic growth, and poverty reduction, and the subsequent contentious charges of corruption resulting in his imprisonment and eventual release. The latter part scrutinizes Bolsonaro’s rise amid crises and his subsequent decline, outlining his reactionary populism characterised by transgressive communication and assaults on democratic institutions, which culminated in the scenes of chaos in Brasília on 8 January 2023, following his electoral defeat. The paper concludes by claiming that these seismic shifts signal a complex political landscape. It underscores both the strengths and constraints of Lula’s conciliatory populism, as well as the enduring influence of Bolsonarism, emphasising the need for addressing historical authoritarian tendencies in Brazil’s political culture.
The June 2013 Uprisings and the Waning of Lulismo in Brazil (2017)
This article takes issue with the common assumption that Dilma Rousseff 's impeachment proceedings should be blamed on the revolts of June 2013. Rather than taking the ousting of the former President as the point of arrival of a causal chain, I privilege the June uprisings as the truly unique event in contemporary Brazilian politics. After analyzing the singularity and the mul-tiplicity of the June revolts, I go on to argue that they laid bare and accelerated a profound crisis of Lulismo, emblematized in the collapse of its three major rhetorical strategies: antagonism (the constant search for an antagonist in the body politic), contradiction (the successive alternation between compromise and radicalism), and oxymoron (the simultaneous maintenance of antago-nisms and contradictions). Looked at from the point of view of the epochal events of June, Rousseff 's impeachment appears as a minor adjustment of the oligarchic pact, a charade that is fairly standard in Brazilian history. On the other hand, June remains open as a source of emancipatory impulses, as an event whose legacy is still in dispute. Este artigo recusa a premissa comum de que a responsabilidade pelo impea-chment de Dilma Rousseff deve ser atribuída às revoltas de Junho de 2013. Em vez de tomar a saída da Presidente como o ponto de chegada de uma cadeia causal, o artigo privilegia os levantes de Junho como um acontecimento verda-deiramente singular na política brasileira contemporânea. Depois de analisar a singularidade e a multiplicidade das revoltas de Junho, proponho a tese de que elas expuseram e aceleraram uma profunda crise do lulismo, emblemati-zada no colapso de suas três principais estratégicas retóricas: o antagonismo (a busca constante por um antagonista no campo político), a contradição (a repetida alternância entre radicalidade e conciliação) e o oxímoro (a ma-nutenção simultânea de antagonismos e contradições). Observado do ponto
Bolsonaro Style and Anti-Politics: From Denial to Exaltation of the Brazilian Military Dictatorship
Scientific Journal of Applied Social and Clinical Science, 2022
In recent years, we have seen or increased authoritarian escalation in the country, promoted both by representatives of the State and by organized groups of civil society. Seeking to contribute to the debate on the current Brazilian political context, in September 2020, I presented a lecture on “Negationism and Anti-Politics” in the Mora in Philosophy in Pandemic Extension Project, linked to the Philosophy Course of the Federal University of Alagoas (MORAIS, 2020a). I do not present a text, I try to systematize in a didactic way some of the ideas debated in my speech non-event, focusing, in particular, on aspects related to the Bolsonaro style person (anti) political project. Therefore, in the first section, I analyze the possibility of considering the Brazilian President a populist politician; in the second, I endorse the social representation of Bolsonaro style; Finally, on the third day, I discuss in an emphatic way a set of affirmations by the Brazilian State Chef in relation to the Military Dictatorship (1964 to 1985) and the use of violence in politics and public security
BRAZIL BETWEEN FASCISM AND DEMOCRACY: The great agreement “with the Supreme Court, with everything” to the “broad front” to defeat Bolsonarism (Atena Editora), 2023
From a critical Marxist reading, the work analyzes the role of the media and the judiciary in coups d'état and the installation of fascist governments in the post-Fordist period. Focusing on Bolsonaro's government, as a result of the 2016 coup, until the 2022 elections, the objective is to demonstrate that, just like democracy, fascism operates through the logic of capital, being inherent to it, and that its overcoming will be possible only with the overcoming of capitalist sociability.
BOLSONARO STYLE AND ANTI-POLITICS: FROM DENIAL TO EXALTATION OF THE BRAZILIAN MILITARY DICTATORSHIP (Atena Editora), 2022
In recent years, we have seen or increased authoritarian escalation in the country, promoted both by representatives of the State and by organized groups of civil society. Seeking to contribute to the debate on the current Brazilian political context, in September 2020, I presented a lecture on “Negationism and Anti-Politics” in the Mora in Philosophy in Pandemic Extension Project, linked to the Philosophy Course of the Federal University of Alagoas (MORAIS, 2020a).
Bolsonaro Politics As Permanent Crisis
Back to the ‘30s? Recurring Crises of Capitalism, Liberalism, and Democracy, 2020
With the election of Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil faces a bleak future, but how did such a racially diverse country elect a racist, fascist, Dictatorship enthusiast after over a decade of Left governance? This essay examines the role of anti-corruption politics as a political strategy in Bolsonaro’s rise to power. I argue that mass anti-corruption protests against Dilma Rousseff’s government 2015 and 2016 that incubated the ‘soft coup’ that removed her from power in 2016, were vital to Bolsonaro’s rise. Moreover Bolsonaroism, can be conceived of as a politics made possible by the irresolvability of political and economic crisis under neoliberalism. Bolsonaro in several respects a politics of permanent crisis. Anti-corruption populism has proved to be a feature of right-wing resurgence in as diverse national contexts as the United States, Italy, France and India, examining the particular case of Brazil allows for a deeper examination of crisis and populism through the lens of corruption. Drawing on the work of Antonio Gramsci, I argue that corruption and anti-corruption should be understood as political strategies utilized by the ruling class or a class faction in a conjecture where rule by consent ( winning elections) or rule by force (open military coup or repression) do not constitute viable strategies.
Capital & Class, 2003
The Brazilian Workers' Party () won a resounding victory in the presidential elections in October . Its candidate, Luís Inácio Lula da Silva (Lula) received m votes (.%) in the first round, and m (.%) in the second round of the elections. His nearest rival, José Serra, a former minister in F.H. Cardoso's administration (-), was beaten by m votes in both rounds. 2 The new president, a former lathe operator and trade union leader, commands nearly universal appreciation. He has been fêted by the international left as well as the government, the and the World Bank, and he is probably the only person ever to be cheered both in the Davos World Economic Forum and the Porto Alegre World Social Forum. This can be explained by Lula's impeccable leftist credentials and personal integrity, and by his adoption of a thoroughly neoliberal economic programme. This article examines the reasons for continuity and the scope for change during the new administration.
2020
This essay focuses on the voters of Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro in Morro da Cruz, a low-income community in Porto Alegre. The transition from Lulism (2002-16) to Bolsonarism (2018-) was marked by the rise and fall of the economy and the collapse of the political system. Based on a ten-year longitudinal ethnography, we look at the effects of such major shifts at the national level on people's individual self-and political subjectivity. We investigate how and why "new consumers"-those who accessed the finance system during the Workers' Party (PT) Administration-came to support a far-right candidate. We argue that the inclusion of the poor into the market economy brought about individual empowerment and a sense of self-worth in the PT era-a process that was threatened by economic recession and unleashed an existential crisis, especially among men. Bolso-naro, as a male figure, and his campaign gave order to a changing world, resulting in a reconciliation of personhood and political belonging.