Sniegon, Tomas, Dying in the Soviet Gulag for the Future Glory of Mother Russia? Making “Patriotic” Sense of the Gulag in Present-Day Russia. In: Bernsand, Niklas & Törnquist-Plewa, Barbara, Cultural and Political Imaginaries in Putin´s Russia, Brill: Leiden & Boston 2018, 105-140 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Routledge Handbook of Russian Politics and Society, 2022
This chapter examines how different political actors in Russia deploy historical memory as a political concept to articulate their concerns about national politics and build public support for their political positions and initiatives. With the 2014 Ukrainian revolution, and again with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the politics of memory in Russia acquired even greater importance. The visibility of new narratives and commemorative initiatives during the Yeltsin era was so prominent that one scholar even hailed “the loss of the war cult” that allegedly opened possibilities for an “authentic” memory to emerge. The concept of historical memory has proved itself a useful tool for the epistemic control of Russian society, as it enables Russian politicians to circumvent the scholarly community in the production of truth-statements about Russian history. The imperial Russian and Soviet historical legacy provokes powerful affective responses among many Russian political actors and audiences, such as pride for past achievement, nostalgia for imperial power, and others.
Memory Politics à la Russe: Memorial vs. Vladimir Putin's Repressive State
The clampdown on Memorial, Russia's oldest and most influential historical-educational and human rights group, has thrown into sharp relief a crucial feature of the country's contemporary history. For the past century, the struggle for freedom, democracy, and human dignity in Russia has been intimately intertwined with the struggle for historical truth. The Memorial Movement was born amid the political turmoil of the late 1980s and almost immediately became one of the leading agents of democratic change. The Kremlin's decision to liquidate Memorial marks the end of an era. The Putin regime is seeking to establish full control over the historical narrative, but that is merely a means to a larger end. Its ultimate goal has been on full display since Russia's brutal invasion of Ukraine: it is to turn the clock back 30 years and erase some fundamental consequences-both domestic
Triumphant memory of the perpetrators: Putin's politics of re-Stalinization
In this article, I explore the interconnection between Putin's politics of re-Stalinization, historical memory, and a specific version of the post-Soviet neo-medievalism. I show that re-Stalinization is a mass movement that is grounded in the unprocessed memory of Soviet crimes and atrocities. The popular myth of the “Great Patriotic War” and the myth of Stalinism as the Golden Age exploited by Putin's memory politics became a gold mine for Putin's kleptocracy. I argue that re-Stalinization and the Kremlin-sponsored ideology of Eurasianism represents two interrelated trends of a complex ideological process. Eurasianism combines Soviet denial of individuality with the idea of a state-dependent patriarchal society and Russian historical messianism. It glorifies the reign of Ivan the Terrible and Stalin. The ‘medievalist’ discourse of Eurasian ideologists, which advocates a return to the medieval society of orders, on the one hand, and the Gothic monsters populating post-Soviet film and fiction, on the other, creates a political language that expresses new attitudes to people in post-Soviet Russia. They depict a new social contract that reconsiders the modern concept of citizenship, and creates a social basis for the criminalization and militarization of Russian society.
Political Invasions into Collective Memories: Russia
This article analyzes the political manipulations of Vladimir Putin’s regime using the collective memory of World War II to undermine protest potential within Russian society in 2013–2015. In light of the unfolding Ukrainian protests against former president Viktor Yanukovych’s rule, Putin’s government has launched a massive propaganda campaign presenting the Ukrainian political resistance as a neofascist initiative. Given the close relationship between Russia and Ukraine and Putin’s low rating at the beginning of 2013, the political changes in Ukraine could provoke a similar public response and inspire anti-Putin insurgencies. The Russian media has established a strong correlation between fascist war crimes committed during World War II and the activities of protesters, thus trying to manipulate the Russian collective memory. Emphasizing the negative experience while repressing positive memories, media outlets have selectively presented historical events and facts in order to establish a negative image of the situation in modern Ukraine. Whereas propaganda associates Putin with war winners and the Soviet legacy, Ukrainian protesters are depicted as the ancestors of the defeated Nazi regime.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2022
The victory in the Great Patriotic War has become the cornerstone myth of Russian politics and identity. Whether there is an international or an internal conflict, the war history is invoked in political speeches and media propaganda. Soviet repressions, on the contrary, are rarely used by the state memory politics. Many scholars claim that the two memories are opposing: one is heroic and “nationalist,” the other is tragic and “cosmopolitan.” A study of regional memory politics and activism shows, however, that the interrelation between the two is more complicated. Rarely do they come in a direct conflict. Instead, depending on the local history and politics, the conflict is either subtle and leads to the “screening” of the repressions history, or it leads to the “framing” of the repressions narratives.
Political Invasions into Collective Memories (2014-2015): Russia”
This article analyzes the political manipulations of Vladimir Putin's regime using the collective memory of World War II to undermine protest potential within Russian society in 2013-2015. In light of the unfolding Ukrainian protests against former president Viktor Yanukovych's rule, Putin's government has launched a massive propaganda campaign presenting the Ukrainian political resistance as a neofascist initiative. Given the close relationship between Russia and Ukraine and Putin's low rating at the beginning of 2013, the political changes in Ukraine could provoke a similar public response and inspire anti-Putin insurgencies. The Russian media has established a strong correlation between fascist war crimes committed during World War II and the activities of protesters, thus trying to manipulate the Russian collective memory. Emphasizing the negative experience while repressing positive memories, media outlets have selectively presented historical events and facts in order to establish a negative image of the situation in modern Ukraine. Whereas propaganda associates Putin with war winners and the Soviet legacy, Ukrainian protesters are depicted as the ancestors of the defeated Nazi regime.