Civil Liability and Antitrust Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
BRICS Law Journal, 2016
This study deals in a succinct way with the Brazilian model of civil procedural law. There is an historical approach specifically about Portuguese law which was in force in Brazil at the beginning (until 1832), after what there comes a brief description of the judiciary structure (courts and judges) and only then we talk about the scope of civil procedure, its fundamental principles and, in a "law in practice" approach, access to justice. The role of a judge towards deciding "according to statutes and evidence" is analysed and the current importance of case law is deeply focused, mainly according to the new CPC (in force since 2015) and so are appellate proceedings, class actions, enforcement proceedings and ADR. The last items concern the role and the importance of academia, and some interesting cultural observations, where we deal with the very serious crisis, both ethical and economic, that Brazil is living now, in the political sphere. The judiciary branch is now our only hope.
Tempo, 2015
This article offers, based on the example of a bankruptcy case (1853–1860) of a tradesman in Porto Alegre, Francisco Ferreira de Almeida, an analysis of the Brazilian Commercial Code’s application in the first decade of its introduction. The purpose of this analysis is to indicate the variety of possibilities that legal agents had at their disposal in the judicial process and the restrictions created on these by legal proceedings. From the case of Ferreira de Almeida, we conclude that the legal system in the years 1850–1860 was characterized by a great complexity of courts, working sometimes in parallel and interacting or communicating in an indirect way. Even the procedure of the Court of Appeal (Tribunal da Relação) was heavily conditioned by local agents and by the actions taken early in the bankruptcy proceedings (conciliation and arbitration). Also, the public and private roles of the agents involved in the judicial process blended up and influenced the process, which still contained elements of the Philippine Ordinances. Consequently, to understand what the legal culture of the Empire was or how courts worked, it is necessary to study the judicial institutions from the point of view of the administrative and communicative practices of the social agents that composed them.
Punitive damages in Brazilian law and the boundaries between criminal and civil liabilities
2009
This article demonstrates the existence of civil responsibility with punitive purposes in Brazilian Law, explaining how it was introduced by jurisdictional activity in cases involving moral damages. Next, it points out main problems this situation represents to Brazilian Law from the standpoint of our juridical dogmatics and public policies. Additionally, it proposes the execution of an empirical research for comprehension of the structure and fundamentals of jurisprudence on the punitive character of civil responsibility for moral damages and establishes criteria for use in this research based on theories of punishment. Finally, it positions the problem of punitive function of civil responsibility in the broader ambit of relationships and boundaries between civil and criminal responsibility.
Since the enactment of the new Anti-corruption Law, the interaction between the antitrust and anti-corruption leniency regimes has attracted the attention of policy makers. More recently, the emergence of Operation Car Wash (" operação lava jato "), one of the biggest corruption scandals of all time, has established a need to more closely analyze the criminal leniency regime under the Criminal Organization Law. Following an introduction, section two of this paper summarizes the recent history of the cooperation between different authorities involved in cartel enforcement. Section three further explores the roles and features of the main authorities discussed in this paper. Section four addresses administrative antitrust, administrative anti-corruption, and criminal infringements related to bid rigging practices. Likewise, section five addresses the main administrative antitrust, administrative and judicial anti-corruption, and criminal penalties that can be imposed by administrative and judicial authorities prosecuting a bid rigging practice. Section six addresses the most significant challenges brought by the interface between administrative antitrust, administrative anti-corruption, and criminal legislation: the issues related to the enforcement of the leniency agreements. The conclusion reinforces the importance of the antitrust, anti-corruption, and criminal authorities working together to reach the best practices that could lead to an optimum enforcement of the three leniency regimes.