Chapter 9: Concluding Remarks (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Combination Problem in Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: Proposing a new synthetic theory
In this paper I critically examine the various metaphysical gaps that confront panpsychism and panprotopsychism. I argue that Strawsonian 'pan-experientialism' is an unfeasible philosophical view of world in the way that it posits the existence of micro-subjects. To overcome the issue of ground the 'subject' of experience, I propose that 'pan-experientialism' can appeal to Identity Panpsychism as a way to avoid the excessive ontology of micro-subjects at the fundamental level of reality.
Brain and Mind: Toward an Understanding of Dualism
Brain, Mind and Consciousness in the History of Neuroscience
A post-Newtonian understanding of matter includes immaterial forces; thus, the concept of ‘physical’ has lost what usefulness it previously had and Cartesian dualism has, consequently, ceased to support a divide between the mental and the physical. A contemporary scientific understanding of mind that goes back at least as far as Priestley in the 18th century, not only includes immaterial components but identifies brain parts in which these components correlate with neural activity. What are we left with? The challenge is no longer to figure out how a physical brain interacts with a nonphysical mind, but to try to unify theories of mind and theories of brain that to date do not share a single property. The challenge is enormous, but at least we can be quite clear about what its nature is, as there is no reason to be distracted by the idea of two distinct substances. In the present volume, many historical perspectives on the mind-body problem are discussed. In what follows, we follow major currents of thought regarding the mind-body problem so that it can be seen how we arrived at the modern conception that it makes sense only to talk about theory unification.
From Micro to Macro: The Combination of Consciousness
2022
Crick and Koch's 1990 "neurobiological theory of consciousness" sparked the race for the physical correlates of subjective experience. 30 years later, cognitive sciences trend toward consideration of the brain's electromagnetic field as the primary seat of consciousness, the "to be" of the individual. Recent advancements in laboratory tools have preceded an influx of studies reporting a synchronization between the neuronally generated EM fields of interacting individuals. An embodied and enactive neuroscientific approach has gained traction in the wake of these findings wherein consciousness and cognition are theorized to be regulated and distributed beyond the individual. We approach this frontier to extend the implications of person-to-person synchrony to propose a process of combination whereby coupled individual agents merge into a hierarchical cognitive system to which they are subsidiary. Such is to say, the complex mammalian consciousness humans possess may not be the tip of the iceberg, but another step in a succeeding staircase. To this end, the axioms and conjectures of General Resonance Theory are utilized to describe this phenomenon of interpersonal resonant combination. Our proposal describes a coupled system of spatially distributed EM fields that are synchronized through recurrent, entraining behavioral interactions. The system, having achieved sufficient synchronization, enjoys an optimization of information flow that alters the conscious states of its merging agents and enhances group performance capabilities. In the race for the neurobiological correlates of subjective experience, we attempt the first steps in the journey toward defining the physical basis of "group consciousness." The establishment of a concrete account of the combination of consciousness at a scale superseding individual human consciousness remains speculation, but our suggested approach provides a framework for empirical testing of these possibilities.
Evolution of Mind and Unity of Consciousness
Chapman University, 2024
The paper argues for a distinction between mind and consciousness. According to the Orthodox Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum theory, which is the dominant way to understand the subject, consciousness is complementary to materiality and it is not a property of matter, and the recently published One Observer Theorem implies that consciousness transcends materiality. Given these results, one must take consciousness to be the non-changing stratum of reality that serves as a kind of light illuminating the contents of the mind. All animals experience consciousness although they may do it in a variety of ways, using structures that have evolved variously in time for different species. The brainstem and diencephalon in conjunction with neocortical connectivity and recurrent processing are used by humans and since the brains of mammals and birds have similar structures one may assert that their experience has a degree of similarity. With continuing evolution in time, the capacity of the future mind may go beyond what humans can currently do.
Kicking the Psychophysical Laws into Gear A New Approach to the Combination Problem
A new approach to the 'hard problem' of consciousness, the eons-old mind-body problem, is proposed, inspired by Whitehead, Schopenhauer, Griffin, and others. I define a 'simple subject' as the fundamental unit of matter and of consciousness. Simple subjects are inherently experiential, albeit in a highly rudimentary manner compared to human consciousness. With this re-framing, the 'physical' realm includes the 'mental' realm; they are two aspects of the same thing, the outside and inside of each real thing. This view is known as panpsychism or panexperientialism and is in itself a partial solution to the hard problem. The secondary but more interesting question may be framed as: what is a 'complex subject'? How do simple subjects combine to form complex subjects like bats and human beings? This is more generally known as the 'combination problem' or the 'boundary problem', and is the key problem facing both materialist and panpsychist approaches to consciousness. I suggest a new approach for resolving this component of the hard problem, a 'general theory of complex subjects' that includes 'psychophysical laws' in the form of a simple mathematical framework. I present three steps for characterizing complex subjects, with the physical nature of time key to this new understanding. Viewing time as fundamentally quantized is important. I also suggest, as a second-order conceptualization, that 'information' and 'experience' may be considered identical concepts and that there is no double-aspect to information. Rather, there is a single
CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series, 2013
The dual process theory is a view that there are two information-processing systems in our mind and that we often employ either or both of them in a wide variety of problem-solving tasks. This theory has attracted considerable attention in cognitive and social psychology for the last decade, but this does not mean that there have been no challenges to the theory. In particular, a concern about underlying mechanisms for each system is one of the most serious objections. In this paper I shall explore how we can interpret the theory so that it can meet this challenge. I will argue that the dual process theorists may be overly optimistic for the prospect of finding underlying causal basis for each system in neural regions, because according to recent findings, almost any single brain region is involved in a wide variety of tasks and it is hard to find the region primarily responsible for each system. Instead, I will argue, the dual process theorists should seek for the causal basis in evolutionary history.
Partial Unity of Consciousness: A Preliminary Defense
Sensory Integration and the Unity of Consciousness. MIT Press., 2014
The debate about the unity of consciousness in split-brain subjects has for the most part been pitched between two positions: that a split-brain subject has a single, unified stream of consciousness, or that she has two streams of consciousness, one associated with each hemisphere. A prima facie appealingly intermediate position, proposed most explicitly by Lockwood, is that a split-brain subject has a single but only partially unified consciousness. Philosophers have overwhelmingly rejected Lockwood’s proposal. This paper issues a prelimary defense of the partial unity model (PUM) of split-brain consciousness. I argue that the major philosophical objections to that model apply no more to it than they do to the conscious disunity or duality model. In particular, both models imply that a split-brain subject has two phenomenally conscious perspectives, and both raise questions about the relationship between having such a perspective and being a subject of experience.
Concerning the Unity of Consciousness
Faith and Philosophy, 1995
Ever since Descartes there have been philosophers who have claimed that the unity of conscious experience argues strongly against the possibility that the mind or self is a material thing. My contention is that the recent neglect of this argument is a mistake, and that it places a serious and perhaps insuperable obstacle in the way of materialist theories of the mind. Ever since Descartes 1 there have been philosophers who have claimed that the unity of conscious experience argues strongly against the possibility that the mind or self is a material thing. This argument surfaced from time to time during the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, but recently it has been neglected. My contention is that this neglect is a mistake, and that the argument places a serious and perhaps insuperable obstacle in the way of materialist theories of the mind. I The argument against materialism from the unity of consciousness is clearly present in Leibniz, as Margaret Wilson has shown. 2 Indeed, the classic form given the argument in the Second Paralogism may well be viewed as Kant's reflective development of the argument taken from Leibniz. Kant's version goes as follows: Every composite substance is an aggregate of several substances, and the actions of a composite, or whatever inheres in it as thus composite, is an aggregate of several actions or accidents, distributed among the plurality of the substances. Now an effect which arises from the concurrence of many acting substances is indeed possible, nar:nely, when this effect is external only (as, for instance, the motion of a body is the combined motion of all its parts). But with thoughts, as internal accidents belonging to a thinking being, it is different. For suppose it be the composite that thinks: then every part of it would be a part of the thought,> and only all of them taken together would be the whole thought. But this cannot consistently be maintained. For representations (for instance, the
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Mind and Consciousness
NeuroQuantology, 2013
In the last 400 years physics has achieved great success, in theory and experimentation, determining the structure of matter and energy. The next great step in the evolution of science will be exploring the role of mind and consciousness in the universe, employing mathematics and fundamental theoretical constructs to yield specific predictions. Based on recent findings in biological autonomy, we propose to approach consciousness from the key aspect of decision-making. This approach allows us to develop a quantitative theory of consciousness as manifested in information processing. Since decision-making occurs at a certain level of organization, natural relations are obtained between consciousness at one level of organization and unconsciousness at another. By following this chain of argument, we also consider the possibility that levels of consciousness and unconsciousness form a self-closing hierarchy. This line of reasoning has led us to theoretically formulate the possible relationships between mind, cellular activity (both neuronal and non-neuronal), and the universe, working with the categories of consciousness, self-consciousness, and unconsciousness. What we propose in the present paper is a natural and straightforward extension of information theory to quantitative measures of consciousness at different levels and scales. A framework that integrates data from multiple disciplines can help us develop a broader theory of consciousness than what is possible from any single field alone. We present quantitative estimations for the rates of information processing at the global and cellular levels of the human organism and suggest values at the level of the universe. Our picture yields a new, quantitative picture of the mental capabilities of Homo sapiens and a reformulation of our place in the universe.