A. Maravela & J. Stolk, Bringing Together the Family for a Daughter's Wedding: P.Yale 1.78 Reconsidered, BASP 55 (2018) 275-280. (original) (raw)
Related papers
A dedicatory letter and its context: Beinecke MS 115
2012
Beinecke MS 1154 ff 1v-7v; 'Libellus de sacramentis a Bonizo Sutrine editus ad galterum le onansis cenobii monacum atque priorem missus. … qui fecit utraque unum.' Libellus de Sacramentis ends without formal explicit, and missing last six lines of the text.
Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 2002
More than three decades ago, David H. Flaherty and the University of North Carolina Press published Essays in the History of EarlyAneri can Law (1969). His work was designed to demonstrate the current state of legal history, to identify areas worthy of investigation, and to encourage legal and nonlegal historians alike to accept the challenge of looking more closely at early American law and its institutions. Flaherty's effort stimulated a variety of works offering fresh looks at law, legal institutions, and the early bar. Nonetheless, fifteen years later, Stanley N.
The Role of the Home in Eudora Welty's Delta Wedding and the Optimist's Daughter
2012
I am most indebted to Pearl McHaney for her direction and guidance through every step of this process. Eudora Welty had a trusted reader and dear friend in Diarmuid Russell, and I have found the same in Pearl. The opportunities she offered me during my graduate career were beyond anything I could have imagined. She has far exceeded the role of director and has become someone I trust fully and adore dearly. I also owe special thanks to Tom McHaney for his advice, giving things for me to ponder, and mostly for his friendship, and to Malinda Snow for her expertise and guidance through the various stages of my graduate career and for making me a better writer. This project was significantly enhanced by my time as the Eudora Welty Research Fellow, a fellowship sponsored by the Eudora Welty Foundation and the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. Special thanks to Julia Young and Forest Galey at the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. I am also thankful to those who attended the talk at the end of my fellowship, asked questions, and gave feedback that both encouraged me in this project and challenged me with new perspectives. I also owe a great deal to Karen Redhead of the Eudora Welty house as well as Mary Alice White; their encouragement and help and my experience volunteering at the Welty home served as a catalyst early on in this project. I am grateful for the support, encouragement, and patient understanding I have been given by my chair, Ben McFry, my dean, Sabrena Parton, and my colleagues at Shorter University over the last three years. I cannot imagine working with better supervisors or colleagues. I also owe thanks to the English department at Georgia State University, and specifically Angela Hall-Godsey and Patricia Ann Godsave. vi To my friends, thank you first and foremost for your friendship but also for your unwavering belief in me. Thank you for patiently understanding when it took me weeks to return phone calls or I had to reschedule time with you. The lunches, get-togethers, emails, texts, facebook posts, tweets, instant messages, letters, and phone calls of encouragement pushed me along and motivated me throughout. I count you among my greatest blessings. And last, I am thankful for my family and the angels to whom I belong. It is because of them that my own connection to home is so strong. In the South, it is not odd that the family unit is the most central force in a person's life, and mine is no different. It is from my own interaction with my family, our home, and the rituals that take place in that home that this project grew. Were I not to possess a deep and intimate tie to my family and our home, I would never have known to look at the home in Welty's writing. I owe the most special thanks to Momma, Jeff, Molly, Charlie, and Anderson for their constant and never waiving support, enthusiasm, encouragement, and love, and I acknowledge the sacrifices they made to ensure my success in this project and life in general. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS
Leonardo da Vinci and France, 2010
Until recently nothing was known of the circumstances of the French king’s invitation to Leonardo to come to France and settle in the vicinity of the principal royal residence of Amboise. A letter dated 14 March 1516 and published here for the first time contains just such an invitation. The letter was sent from Lyon, where the royal court was then in residence, by Guillaume Gouffier de Bonnivet, Admiral of France, to the French ambassador in Rome Antonio Maria Pallavicini. Besides fixing the date of the invitation, the letter reveals the role of the king’s mother, Louise of Savoy, in urging Leonardo to accept the King’s invitation. The article speculates on the role played by Louise’s sister Philiberte, who was married to Giuliano de’ Medici, Leonardo’s patron at the time. The timing of the invitation may have been linked to Giuliano’s rapidly deteriorating health; his death at Fiesole a few days later was surely an important factor in Leonardo’s decision to leave Rome and settle in Clos Lucé near Amboise. This paper was presented in June 2009 at Clos Lucé at a conference marking the opening of an exhibition entitled ‘Léonard de Vinci et la France’. Please note errata and corrigenda as of 18 March 2017