Blood and ink: The relationship between Islamic State propaganda and Western media (original) (raw)
Related papers
Critical Studies on Terrorism , 2020
This article analyses the imagined threat posed by the Islamic State in the aftermath of the November 13th Paris attacks and during the build-up to the December 2nd 2015 House of Commons vote to extend U.K. airstrikes to Syria. Drawing together Political Communications and International Relations approaches to framing analysis, and focusing on Britain’s three main television news providers (BBC, ITV and Channel 4), it questions (1) how is the Islamic State is framed for U.K audiences, (2) who shapes those frames, and (3) what consequences arise from adopting certain frames over others? The analysis identifies three competing representational frames (labelled here as the “(Para)Military”, the “Elusive” and the “Extremist” frames), and their main advocates, and shows how, ultimately, U.K. news media tend to support an “elite”-centred framing of the threat, via its foregrounding of the “(Para)Military” and “Extremist” frames, thus legitimising calls for extending airstrikes into Syria. In so doing, the article provides two contributions to knowledge: first, empirical, by generating substantive new insight into the way the Islamic State was portrayed in the days and weeks following the Paris attacks, and in particular who shapes such frames; and, second, conceptual, via its blending of Political Communications and International Relations approaches to framing and their consequences.
Media Discourse on Jihadist Terrorism in Europe
This article analyses the manner in which European print media discuss jihadist terrorism in Europe. It presents key results from a qualitative analysis of media discourse following three selected attacks in seven European countries in 2010: the attack on the cartoonist Westergaard, the Yemen cargo plane plot, and the Stockholm suicide attack. The article finds that attack type is a factor shaping media discourse across different media in Europe.
Recontextualizing Terror: ISIS Narratives in the English Media
Drawing upon the interdisciplinary approach of Baker's (2006) narrative theory-informed analysis, this paper analyses the English translations of the Arabic editorials on Daesh which were published by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) between the years 2013 and 2016. MEMRI is a Washington-based think tank that is largely quoted by the Western, mainly the US, prominent media outlets. This paper aims to investigate the role of the media in utilising translation as a vehicle of reconstructing and renegotiating the narratives in question. It also examines the effectiveness of contextual framing in altering narratives of the terrorist acts carried by Daesh (the Islamic State) which in turn communicates a distort image of Islam and Muslims to the Euro-Mediterranean officials and publics. The findings suggest that contextual framing is an effective device in redirecting the original narratives in media translations that function outside the immediate text. Reframing context is significant linguistic method in inserting particular ideologies and agendas in the target narrative in line with the meta-narrative of the 'War on Terror'. Thus there is a need to translate informatively and innovatively the contexts of unknown phenomena themselves due to the difference in culture of North-South and East-West publics of the Euro-Mediterranean.
The Media in the Service of ISIS Propaganda War
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is a unique media phenomenon that benefited greatly from the tremendous technological developments in the world in recent years, the thing which called for Western and other countries to take many measures to reduce the risk of its widespread fame. This study discusses how ISIS uses the media to spread their propaganda, especially the exploitation of modern communication technology. It also examines an essential aspect of the way the mainstream media deal with ISIS media, showing how we could respond to the narrative of ISIS in the era of new media technology. The study concludes that ISIS relies on all media outlets from the mainstream media to social media platforms (e.g. Facebook and Twitter) to propagate their barbarous ideas. However, the mainstream media and social networks have taken norms against terrorist and extremist groups, besides defining rules of employment that prohibit the use of their services to promote terrorist activities.
The War on Terrorism and the Media: A Critical Look
2011
This paper tries to examine the dominant media discourse on terrorism. It critically unveils the ruses of western media. Western media especially the American media portray Arabs or Muslims as “other”. American media discourse indicates that Muslims reject the values of liberal democracy for religious reasons – and especially the separation of “religion” from “politics” and a commitment to peace. Arab or Islamic civilization was pre-modern, irrational, aggressive, brutal, and violent. This article also provides different aspects of media coverage on terrorism. In brief, western media depict war on terrorism as cultural clash between democratic western powers and uncivilized Islamic civilizations; and hide social, political, and economic aspects of this confrontation through the art of manipulations.
https://jahan-e-tahqeeq.com/, 2022
Islam and the West has become the theme of various academic conferences and research symposiums all over the world due to increasing wave of conflicts and clashes between east and the west and between orient and the oxidant. The conflict and clashes between Islam and the west is not new phenomena but it has centuries old history of attacks and counter attacks, conquests and re-conquests, jihads and crusades. But after cold war and more precisely after 9/11 these conflicts are changed into a new information and propaganda warfare. Islam has deliberately been associated with terrorism, radicalism and extremism and Muslims are intentionally portrayed as fundamentalists, extremists and ultimately terrorists under the ghost of Taliban and ISIS linking it with Caliphate concept of Islam. This research aims to investigate as how the western mass media generally and US print media especially portrays Islam and Muslims.
The Role of Western Mainstream Media: How Islam is Being Branded as Promoter of Violence
PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2017
Whenever we see any terrorist incident committed by a Muslim, happened anywhere in the world, instantly some of the newspapers and TV channels start screaming that it’s a ‘Jihadist’ activity. Jihad has become the synonym of Islamic Terrorism. The western media tries to portray that through Jihad, Islam is encouraging its followers to kill non-believers and people from other religion. This paper is a research on the rise of Islamophobia in the contemporary world and the role of media in spreading it. This wave of anti-Islam sentiment is prevalent in various forms in all the spheres of life but here the ones related with media are emphasized. Here in this paper discussion has been done as to how the media is portraying Islam as the religion which promotes violence and the Muslims as terrorists and ultimately playing a significant role in the global rise of Islamophobia and Xenophobic attack against Muslims. It is important to analyze the role of the media because there is a nexus amon...
This chapter seeks to examine how the institutional symbioses of policy and media in the U.S. and Russia construct the image of Islam and Muslims in connection to terrorism. Two separate studies were conducted to address the specifics of media framing. By analyzing the media portrayal of Islam following terrorist attacks, the first study aimed to understand framing differences in communicating anti-terrorism policies between Russia and the United States. The second study undertook a content analysis of the portrayal of the Islamic State in U.S. and Russian newspapers in order to link media framing to foreign policy differences regarding the Syrian campaign
The Media, Extremism and Terrorism: An Unintentional Business Relationship
Social Communication
Although the goals of the press and terrorists are not the same, the two groups engage in a mutually beneficial relationship that often appears confusing to scholars and the public. Both the press and the terrorists need and crave the attention of the public. In this paper the authors examine the motives and the methods that the media and the terrorists attempt to achieve their goals. The terrorists need the attention to create terror and spread their propaganda to further their political causes. The media needs the sensationalism created by the terrorists to attract viewers or readers and to positively effect ratings. The study found that the stories about terrorism increased media ratings while unintentionally benefiting the terrorist by publicizing the terrorist cause.