Driving Into the Unknown: Examining the Crossroads of Criminal Law and Autonomous Vehicles (original) (raw)
Related papers
As the Role of the Driver Changes with Autonomous Vehicle Technology, so, Too, Must the Law Change
St. Mary's Law Journal, 2020
Getting a driver’s license is a highly anticipated rite of passage for most teenagers. Being alone behind the wheel, in control of a 3,000-pound machine, is an honor, a privilege, and a sign of adult responsibility. How will that change when driver’s licenses become licenses “to cause technology to engage” with the increased use of autonomous cars? Will driver’s education courses, with their focus on safety rules and defensive driving techniques, be eliminated if all a vehicle operator needs to do is push a button and the vehicle does the rest? While arguably autonomous cars are safer, they will not be incident-free, so who is liable for the fender bender? If the vehicle operator did nothing more than push a button, current law that focuses on the actions of the tortfeasor might not apply, and the limited law related to autonomous computer systems may apply only in commercial transactions, not autonomous vehicles. Will the carmaker or the software programmer have liability, either for accidents or intentional damage caused by hacking? This paper discusses how the law must change to keep up with rapidly changing technology in autonomous vehicles.
Self-Driving Cars: Legal Challenges and Criminal Law Implications
Real-World Applications of AI Innovation, 2024
The chapter focuses on self-driving automobiles, one of the most well-known modern technology applications in intelligent transportation that is predicted to significantly improve human life and mobility. Utilizing such technology may cause some people to worry about how it may affect their legal situation. The relevance and practicality of some incidents caused by the use of self-driving cars emphasize the significance of this research and the need for investigation into the legal principles controlling criminal liability for accidents caused by these vehicles. The study concluded by urging lawmakers to create an integrated legal framework that governs the use of self-driving cars. It defines the legal framework to hold accountable those responsible for accidents caused by their use of intelligent transportation. It also stressed the importance of creating legislative or regulatory rules that require self-driving car manufacturers and self-driving system operators, in addition to the requirement to update traffic laws to allow regulation of self-driving cars.
From Science Fiction to Reality: How will the law adapt to Self-Driving Vehicles?
Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2018
This paper briefly addresses what follows when the responsibility of driving is completely shifted to the autonomous vehicle system and all of its components. It also examines the different theories of liability and their potential application in the context of autonomous vehicles. This paper, however, is not intended to provide the final answer to all questions in this regard, but to identify the main challenges, and provide perspectives on how to deal with such issue.
Automated Driving and the Future of Traffic Law
Regulating New Technologies in Uncertain Times, 2019
Fully automated vehicles that can operate without human interference are getting closer to reality. Fully automated vehicles are expected to offer many benefits, from limiting the need for parking space to increased road traffic safety. Besides all the technical challenges, this development also gives rise to several legal questions. This is not surprising given that most national and international traffic laws are based on the notion that a human driver is behind the wheel. What is the legal consequence of letting the vehicle drive itself? This contribution will focus on the legal challenges automated driving poses for traffic law. Other legal questions will also be touched upon, for instance questions regarding liability and insurance, but the emphasis will lie on questions regarding traffic laws as the answers to those questions can influence the answers to the other legal questions. This contribution will discuss if an automated vehicle still has a driver within the meaning of t...
Criminal Law Forum, 2023
Automated vehicles (''AV'') can greatly improve road safety and societal welfare, but legal systems have struggled with the prospect of whom to hold criminally liable for resulting harm, and how. This difficulty is derived from the characteristics of modern artificial intelligence (''AI'') used in AV technology. Singapore, France and the UK have pioneered legal models tailored to address criminal liability for AI misbehaviour. In this article, we analyse the three models comparatively both to determine their individual merits and to draw lessons from to inform future legislative efforts. We first examine the roots of the problem by analysing the characteristics of modern AI vis-a`-vis basic legal foundations underlying criminal liability. We identify several problems, such as the epistemic problem, a lack of control, the issue of generic risk, and the problem of many hands, which discommode the building blocks of criminal negligence such as awareness, foreseeability and risk taking-a condition we refer to as negligence failures. Subsequently, we analyse the three models on their ability to address these issues. We find diverging philosophies as to where to place the central weight of criminal liability, but nevertheless identify common themes such as drawing bright-lines between liability and immunity, and the introduction of novel vocabulary necessary to navigate the new legal landscape sculpted by AI. We end with specific recommendations for future legislation, such as the importance of implementing an AI training and licensing regime for users, and that transition demands must be empirically tested to allow de facto control.
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018
Autonomous vehicles trigger lots of legal problems. Whether this challenge, however, adds up to a paradigm shift in legal thinking is to be analysed further. As robotics develop globally, the legal institutions need to keep pace with it, because business risk, such as liability, has to be reasonably calculable for investors. Due to the expansive applicability of robotics, the relevant legal questions are manifold. The law faces applicatory as well as regulatory challenges. What is the standard for an autonomous vehicle? What should be the safety standards in driverless cars? How many bugs are to be acceptable in a software in case of a car crash? Who should be liable for an autonomous vehicle when it follows the rule and when it does not? How to tame the regulation by design to be more like a rule of law? This paper focuses on pragmatic problems and solutions and new regulatory models, like regulation by communication. It also introduces the concept of stealthy technologies, the meaning of which is that no matter what the rule is innovative technologies are going to be overwhelmingly widespread. 2 1234567890''""
General outstanding considerations on legal issues applied to autonomous vehicles
2015
Even if there are many differences between the autonomous vehicles and aviation, we have tried to show that the long history of automation in airplanes can be a source of inspiration to understand some legal aspects necessary to allow autonomous cars on the streets. Independent on the technological evolution, the premise of this work is to ask the questions that must be faced if a fatal accident involving an autonomous vehicle occurs. In this sense, criminal issues will arise and the autonomous vehicles will be put under legal scrutiny.
THE CHALLENGES OF AUTONOMOUS MOTOR VEHICLES FOR QUEENSLAND ROAD AND CRIMINAL LAWS
This article examines the challenges of autonomous motor vehicles for Queensland road and criminal laws. Autonomous vehicles refer to motor vehicles where driver decision making has been augmented or replaced by intelligent systems. Proponents of autonomous vehicles argue that they will virtually eliminate road accidents, boost productivity and provide significant environmental benefits. The key issue is that autonomous vehicles challenge the notion of human responsibility which lies at the core of Queensland's road and criminal laws. The road rules are predicated on a driver in control of the vehicle, the intoxication regime is concerned with the person in charge of the vehicle and the dangerous driving offences require a person who operates a vehicle. Notwithstanding this challenge, it can be seen that much of Queensland's law is adaptable to autonomous vehicles. However, there are some identifiable anomalies that require reform. I INTRODUCTION This article examines the challenges of autonomous vehicles for Queensland road and criminal laws. The challenge of autonomous vehicles is that by replacing or augmenting driver decision making, existing laws that assume driver responsibility seem inadequate. Nevertheless, it is argued that much of Queensland's road and criminal laws are adaptable to autonomous vehicles. However, there are some clear anomalies that will need to be addressed to effectively maximise the safety, economic and environmental benefits of autonomous vehicles. Furthermore, there will be the need for more detailed reforms as autonomous vehicles become more widespread. This argument is in three sections. The first section locates autonomous vehicles within a trajectory of innovation that has steadily reduced driver involvement with primary vehicle controls. The technical details of emerging autonomous vehicles will be canvassed and the safety, economic and environmental drivers for adoption will be outlined. This section concludes by identifying different 'levels' of automation for autonomous vehicles which forms the basis for the second section. This section also argues why a focus on Queensland law is appropriate and desirable. The second section audits the challenges of the different levels of automation for Queensland's road and criminal laws. 1 The focus is on the substantive provisions of the rules of the road, the. I would like to thank officers from the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads, Professor Ross Martin QC, Dr Colleen Davis, Ashley Pearson, Mark Brady and anonymous referees who provided comment on the paper. All errors, oversights and misunderstandings remain my own. 1 From the perspective of Queensland criminal law, it could be said that making a distinction between the road rules and the criminal law is artificial as the road rules are a subset of the broader criminal law in Queensland. However, this paper makes the distinction for specific reasons. First, whether the regulatory offences in the
Autonomous driving: present and emerging trends of technology, ethics, and law
Handbook on AI and Transportation - Chapter 20: Autonomous driving: present and emerging trends of technology, ethics, and law, 2023
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) have developed quickly in the past few years and are poised to define the future of mobility. This can be attributed to tailwinds such as the increase in computational power, advances in the artificial intelligence (AI) field, and a favorable regulatory environment created by the impending climate crisis. From a sustainability point of view, AVs can be a major enabling technology for various Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Nonetheless, their system complexity and increased dependence on intractable AI algorithms should be addressed and studied, as they could inhibit some of the SDGs. In this work, a comprehensive description of the different sensors and AI algorithms used in AVs is given, as well as their governance and ethical implications. The development of complex deep learning (DL) algorithms is seen as a key factor in the development of more complex AVs, and in the use of camera-based AVs over LIDAR/radar based platforms. When it comes to decision-making, reinforcement learning (RL) is the key machine learning subclass allowing for an increase in the complexity of the actions being automated. Nonetheless, both DL and RL require vast amounts of training data, which should be heterogeneous and exhaustive enough to allow for the safe deployment of the AV into the real world. This poses clear issues related to privacy and data governance, which should be addressed both by institutions and AV manufacturers. Lastly, the increased complexity of AVs raises ethical and accountability issues, and the lack of international safety standards, such as those existing for normal vehicles, is seen as a major issue to be tackled.