Designing Outrage, Programming Discord: A Critical Interface Analysis of Facebook as a Campaign Technology (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social media and society, 2017
This study identifies the various communication tools and content styles political parties use to reach their Facebook constituency, examines the degree to which they are used, and evaluates the effectiveness of their engagement. Three means of analysis are used: number and frequency of posts by the party, types of posts being made, and responses to the posts by the public. This work thus provides a baseline for discussion on the question of how political parties can and have capitalized on online social media networks in order to effect political engagement, participation, and mobilization.
Posting About Politics: Media as Resources For Political Expression on Facebook
This paper explores political expression on Facebook during the 2012 presidential debates. We investigate how individuals and organizations appropriated media resources to craft responses to the debates, and what this reveals about sources of influence in political communication on social media. In particular, we compare the stream of posts that spread widely during the debates—content that “went viral”—with more mundane practices of personal expression to show differences between the viral content that caught the attention of news media coverage about the debates and the posting practices of individuals using their Facebook as a site for individual expression.
Boon or Bane for Political Engagement: A Large-Scale Study of Normalization of Facebook
Does Facebook help or hurt political engagement? Some scholars argue (e.g., Resnick, 1997, 1998) that social media has taken over old media (e.g., newspaper, television) as a leading communication channel, but communication practices of human beings remain unchanged on the web. Resnick suggests the internet neither empowers citizens nor revitalizes democracy, because online communications occur within preexisting economic, legal, and social frameworks. To test this theory called normalization of the cyberspace, this study examines engagement on two verified Facebook pages run by the campaigns of two main candidates of the 2016 U.S. presidential election—Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. The study combines two computational methods—sentiment analysis and automated topic classification—and a quantitative content analysis method to analyze 6,122 status messages, 2.8 million user comments, and 0.6 million replies. Results largely support the claims of the theory that traditional communication practices of election campaigns are transferred to the internet.
“I Can Share Politics But I Don’t Discuss It”: Everyday Practices of Political Talk on Facebook.
Social Media + Society, 2017
The article explores how a group of young people in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom experience and manage informal political talk on Facebook. Based on 60 interviews with 14- to 25-year-olds with diverse interest and participation in politics, it understands political talk as a social achievement dependent on the situational definition, shaped by the perceived imagined audiences, shared expectations, and technological affordances. Results show that young people construct different interactional contexts on Facebook depending on their political experiences, but also on their understanding of the affordances of networked publics as shaped by the social norms of their peer groups. Many youth define Facebook as an unsafe social setting for informal political discussions, thus adhering to a form of “publicness” aimed at neutralizing conflicts. Others, instead, develop different forms of “publicness” based on emergent communicative skills that help them manage the uncertainty of social media as interactional contexts. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117747849
Facing an uncertain reception: young citizens and political interaction on Facebook
This article explores how the social ambiguities concerning audience and reception of posts on Facebook shape the forms of political interaction among young citizens on the site. Two sets of in-depth interviews are used to illustrate the ways that uncertainties about audience reception on Facebook inspire strategies for ‘inventing’ modes of political interaction on the one hand, and, for others, suppress opinion expression by creating the sense that talking politics on the site is a high risk endeavor.
Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2014
This article examines the role of social media in contemporary political communication, focusing on Barack Obama's Facebook campaign in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. Although there is a growing body of literature on online forms of participation, little research exists on the role of social buttons on Facebook (like, comment, and share) as tools of political voice. We use these native interactive features as indicators of how citizens engage with particular political messages. A content analysis of posts published on Obama's official Facebook page over the two months leading up to Election Day was conducted, along with a detailed measurement of all user interactions for each post. Our analysis indicates that the Obama campaign used Facebook as a tool of top-down promotion, focusing on Obama's personality and as a means of strategically guiding followers to act, rather than as a means of bottom-up empowerment or hybridized coproduction. However, we also found that followers engaged selectively with campaign messages and often interacted more with policy-oriented posts than with promotional ones. 5 10 15
The Double Conditioning of Political Participation: Grassroots Politics on Facebook
The emergence of social network sites as a part of everyday life has given rise to a number of debates on the democratic potential afforded by these technologies. This paper addresses political participation facilitated through Facebook from a practice-oriented perspective and presents a case study of the political grassroots organisation, Fight For The Future. Initially, the paper provides a basic theoretical framework that seeks to map the relation between civic practices, materiality, and discursive features. Using this framework, the article analyses Fight For The Future’s use of Facebook to facilitate political participation. The study finds that user participation on the Facebook page is ‘double conditioned’ by the material structure of the social network site on the one hand and by the discourses articulated by the organisation and users on the other. Finally, the paper discusses the findings and raises a number of problems and obstacles facing participatory grassroots organisations, such as Fight For The Future, when using Facebook.
Engaging with Political and Social Issues on Facebook in College Life
Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
College students are exposed to a vast amount of information on political and social issues through social media. We studied how college students engage with political and social issues on Facebook in a weeklong study with 50 participants using diary entries and interviews. The interviews revealed a duality of benefits for using Facebook for news and they also revealed challenges of selfpresentation around news. Benefits included gaining multiple perspectives and enabling social sense making, providing personal relevance and convenience of access, and the opportunity for social engagement. Impression management and disclosure concerns strongly influence some people to refrain from commenting or sharing news. We discuss the challenges that context collapse poses for Facebook news readers. We suggest design ideas and future directions to encourage more balanced participation with news among college students.