WTO framework applicable to EU trade in energy (original) (raw)

Abstract

The WTO legal framework in the field of energy is a disintegrated one. There are no specific rules on energy directly addressing its production, purchase and distribution, and even the word ‘energy’ is absent from the multitude of agreements composing the WTO system. The reason for this may be traced back to the historical roots of the organisation, with just a small number of producers of energy involved in the creation of the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) – the precursor of the WTO. Only more recently have major energy-producing States such as Russia and Saudi Arabia, together with some significant consumers like China or transit States like Ukraine, acceded to the WTO, amplifying a problem that is now strongly felt. This problem does not lie in the impossibility of applying WTO rules to energy-relating issues – this application is indeed absolutely possible – but in the fact that these rules were not tailored to energy, are incomplete and scattered throughout the WTO instruments. Incomplete because some topics are not covered (e.g., electricity as a non-storable, sui generis good has no status) or are covered in a general fashion, with no focus on energy problems (e.g., Art. V GATT on transit of goods is more basic than the relevant provision – Art. 7 – in the 1991 Energy Charter Treaty). Not-fully consistent because an activity like the transnational supply of energy is situated in the middle ground between the provision of a good (covered by the GATT) and of a service (covered by the General Agreements on Trade in Services; “GATS”), and ends up being subject to a dual regime49. This notwithstanding, there are many WTO rules that may find application in cases concerning energy resources. They range from the most-favoured-nation (Arts. I GATT, Art. II GATS) and the national- treatment principles (Art. III GATT, Art. XVII GATS)50 to the prohibition of quantitative restrictions (Art. XI GATT), subsidies (Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, hereinafter “ASCM”) and dumping (Anti-dumping Agreement; “ADA”). The reach from the rules on monopolies and State enterprises (Arts. II and XVII GATT, Art. VIII GATS) and technical obstacles to trade (Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade) to those on the Agreement on Trade-related Investment Measures (“TRIMs”; e.g., local-content requirements) and the Agreement on Agriculture (biofuels). The functioning of many of these rules is well known in legal doctrine, so they will not be analysed in-depth here. Except for the Government Procurement Agreement – which is important since the greatest energy transactions are concluded through contracts between states and private companies – only a few elements will be discussed, as incidental to the main topics of this chapter, namely the fight against market distortions and the protection of the environment, two of the main political and legal challenges the EU is now facing.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (26)

  1. T. Meyer, Energy Subsidies and the World Trade Organization, ASIL Insights, 2013. 83 EU and Certain Member States -Renewable Energy (WT/DS452/1 -G/L/1008 -G/SCM/D95/1 -G/TRIMS/D/34).
  2. R. Steenblick, Subsidies in the Traditional Energy Sector, in Pauwelyn (ed.), Global Challenges cit., pp. 184-185.
  3. J. de Melo, M. Vijil, The Critical Mass Approach to Achieve a Deal on Green Goods and Services: What is on the Table? How Much to Expect?, Ferdi Working Paper 107, 2014.
  4. S. Woolcock, European Union Policy Towards Free Trade Agreements, ECRE Working Paper, No. 3/2007.
  5. S. Gstohl, D. Hanf, The EU's Post-Lisbon, cit., p. 733.
  6. 99 Ibidem. 100 The concept of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements (DCFTAs) will be addressed in the ensuing chapter. 101 See below, Section 4.2.1.
  7. See, for instance, the agreement with Singapore and the agreement with Korea referred to in Section 4.2 below.
  8. CETA, Investment, Art. X.1.
  9. Even in the absence of such specification, the same conclusion could perhaps be reached on the basis of an argument of functional analogy. Since States exercise in those maritime zones sovereign powers over natural resources that -at least in some respects -can be equated to sovereignty, EU law applies in those areas within the limits of the allocation of competences between member States and the Union itself. See Court of Justice of the European Union, 17 January 2012, Salemink, C-347/10, EU:C:2012:17, para. 35.
  10. Art. 21(2)f TEU reads: 'help develop international measures to preserve and improve the quality of the environment and the sustainable management of global natural resources, in order to ensure sustainable development'.
  11. I. Dreyer, TTIP and Europe's energy question, 4 June 2014 (www.borderlex.eu/comment-ttip-europes-energy-question).
  12. Coverage Schedules under the Revised GPA, Annex 5, at: www.wto.org/english/tratop\_e/gproc\_e/gp\_app\_agree\_e.htm.
  13. Consolidated CETA Text, Canadian Government Procurement Market Access Offer, at: www.international.gc.ca/trade- agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/ceta-aecg/text-texte/21_01.aspx?lang=eng.
  14. US-EIA, Canada Report (2014), at: www.eia.gov/countries/analysisbriefs/Canada/canada.pdf. 115 See the WTO Report on Trade in Natural Resources (2010), p. 183.
  15. EU-Korea FTA, Arts. 7-6, 7.13.
  16. J. Harrison, The Legal Framework for Investment Protection between the European Union and Korea: Towards a Level Playing Field for Investors, in J. Harrison (ed.), The European Union and South Korea, EUP, 2013, pp. 102-123.
  17. Another case concerns the moratorium on off-shore wind farms adopted by the Ontario Power Authority. Pending research on their health effects, it has been challenged on the grounds that it would have been in conflict with NAFTA's provisions on expropriation and fair and equitable treatment. Moreover, in 2013, some thirteen new cases were brought against the Czech Republic and Spain for issues related to the withdrawal of their programmes for subsidies to renewable energy under the applicable bilateral investment treaties. See: UNCTAD, IIA Issues Note, Recent Development in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, No. 1 April 2014, at: http://unctad.org/en/publicationslibrary/webdiaepcb2014d3\_en.pdf.
  18. Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in EU Agreements, EU Commission Fact Sheet, March 2014, at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/march/tradoc\_152273.pdf. See also: CETA, Rules of Procedure and Code of Conduct, Annex I.
  19. See Energy Community Secretariat, Albania Country Report, Annual Implementation Report, 2014, available at: https://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/DOCS/3356147/EC_Implementation_Report_2014_ALBANIA.pdf.
  20. See Energy Community Secretariat, Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Report, Annual Implementation Report, 2014, available at: https://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/DOCS/3356150/EC_Implementation_Report_2014_BOSNIA_AND_HERZEGOVIN
  21. A.pdf.
  22. N. Sumbadze, Possible Challenges of harmonization of Georgian Legislation with the AcquisCommunautaire of the European Union in Energy sector, PMC Research Center and Konrad Adenauer Foundation, available at: http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas\_39854-1522-1-30.pdf?141208103512.
  23. See Energy Community Secretariat, Kosovo Country Report, Annual Implementation Report, 2014, available at: https://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/DOCS/3356151/EC_Implementation_Report_2014_KOSOVO.pdf
  24. See Energy Community Secretariat, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Country Report, Annual Implementation Report, 2014, available at: https://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/DOCS/3356154/EC_Implementation_Report_2014_FYR_of_MACEDONIA.pdf.
  25. See Energy Community Secretariat, Moldova Country Report, Annual Implementation Report, 2014, available at: https://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/DOCS/3356155/EC_Implementation_Report_2014_MOLDOVA.pdf.
  26. See Energy Community Secretariat, Serbia Country Report, Annual Implementation Report, 2014, available at: https://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/DOCS/3356161/EC_Implementation_Report_2014_SERBIA.pdf.