"Commemoration of the Antonine Aristocracy in Cassius Dio and the Historia Augusta," in CQ 62.1 (2012): 387-414. (original) (raw)
AI-generated Abstract
The article examines the representation of three prominent figures from the time of Marcus Aurelius in the works of Cassius Dio and the Historia Augusta, evaluating the senatorial ethos portrayed by Dio. It argues that Dio presents a view of the Antonine aristocracy that emphasizes the cooperative relationship between the senate and the emperor, in contrast to the more fragmented aristocratic ethos reflected in the Historia Augusta. The analysis highlights the implications of this depiction for understanding the dynamics of senatorial power and the nuances of historical narrative, particularly during a period marked by social change.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
"Cassius Dio—Pepaideumenos and Politician on Kingship"
Cassius Dio—Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. (Brill’s Historiography of Rome and its Empire, 1). Lange, C.H. & Madsen, J.M. (eds.) Leiden: Brill., 2016
[Draft. See Lange & Madsen 2016 for published version or write me for a copy.] Cassius Dio’s stance that democracy does not work and that monarchy is the only realistic form of government (e.g., Cass. Dio 44.2.1) might help explain his historiographic tendency to focus on powerful individuals. Yet, if we consider his situation among the sophistic milieu of the second and third centuries CE, there are perhaps other reasons for his inclination toward this political philosophy and the attending historiographical approach. Dio measures the excellence of principes sometimes in terms of virtue, fortune, or military prowess, but consistently in terms of paideia. He thereby provides a type of kingship theory across his History in which successful emperors embrace sophisticated education. It must be noted who the bearers and teachers of this paideia are—a select group of intellectual senators—that is, members of the elite like Dio himself. Cassius Dio’s attitudes on kingship, then, can be viewed as a self-serving extension of his position as pepaideumenos and politician.
Cassius Dio, Caracalla, and the Senate, Klio 97 (2015) 159-177
Klio, 2015
Recently, efforts have been made to characterize Cassius Dio's history of the reign of Caracalla as reflective of the experiences of a marginalized senator, rather than of the senate as a whole. A re-evaluation of Dio's account suggests that Dio's version of events should remain the most valuable literary source for this period. Dio maintained a consistent view of the principate throughout his contemporary history, and his depiction of Caracalla as hostile toward the senate is supported by other sources. Finally, a survey of Dio's political career shows that he evaluated each emperor in his contemporary history through the example of the ideal emperor, Marcus Aurelius, not according to the favor (or lack thereof) he experienced under each ruler.
This paper provides an analysis of the relation between the senatorial order under the tetrarchs. First, it examines modes of communication and (ritualized) interaction between the senate, individual senators and the emperors. A second part focuses of the significance, composition and functions and the ordo amplissimus between 285-305. A third part provides a prosopographical collection of known senators under Diocletian and his co-emperors. As becomes clear, the importance of senators and the senate in general diminished greatly under the tetrarchs in the whole Roman Empire, except in Italy and Rome, where the ordo senatorius apparently succeeded in maintaining his prestigious position and influence at least on an ideological level.
Cassius Dio’s Ideal Government and the Imperial Senate
C. Burden-Strevens, J. Madsen and A. Pistellato (eds.) Cassius Dio and the Principate (Venice, Lexis): 67-93, 2020
This chapter argues that Dio envisioned a surprisingly minimalist role for the Senate in his ideal government: Magistrates and advisors were drawn from the senators, but the emperor should hold absolute power and the Senate should not constitute an important forum of genuine deliberation or advice. Instead, in Dio’s ideal government, the consilium was the key forum of debate informing imperial policy. Dio’s ideal government, and the place of the Senate therein, is distinctive as it broke with a long tradition of senatorial writing which idealised a system of government where the Senate played a central role. This nuances the widespread view of Dio as a “senatorial historian”.
Cassius Dio on imperial legitimacy, from the Antonines to the Severans
This paper was commissioned by Marianne Coudry, Michel Molin and Gianpaolo Urso for a collaborative volume entitled "Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures / New Studies on Cassius Dio," forthcoming from Ausonius. I was invited to study Dio's evaluation of the legitimacy of emperors of the second century. I first establish a framework of evaluation for Dio's narrative in respect of imperial legitimacy in the Antonine and Severan periods in light of three considerations: a general understanding of the ideological operations of the Principate as regards emperor, upper class, populace and army; normative statements about proper practice in the imperial office offered by Maecenas in book 52; and the programmatic qualification of those statements offered by Dio in the course of book 53. Thereafter I take up first the axes of analysis employed by Dio to evaluate the emperors of the Antonine and Severan periods, on the understanding that Dio assesses their legitimacy principally in terms of their conduct in office and not, for example, in light of the events that brought about their accession. The final section reflects on superordinate problems raised by Dio in respect to the legibility of politics and the historical enterprise in the monarchy. The essay will be published soon. Anyone who wishes the pagination of the published text should please contact me (cando@uchicago.edu).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.