Rashīd Riḍā in Europe - A monomythic reading of his travel narrative (original) (raw)
The present article deals with the travel narrative of the famous Muslim reformist thinker Muḥammad Rashīd Riḍā’s only visit to Europe in 1921. The text was published in seven parts under the title al-Riḥla al-ʾŪrubiyya (‘the European Journey’) between February and October 1922 in the journal al-Manār (‘the Lighthouse’) after Riḍā’s return. The following paper is an attempt to show how the pattern coined as the “hero’s journey” or the “monomyth” may apply to Riḍā’s seven-part account. Thus, shedding light on the numerous monomythical elements in Riḍā’s European Journey and showing their counterparts in the classical pattern of the hero’s journey will constitute the main part of this paper. A monomythic reading may not only explain the lack of a coherent chronological structure in this travelogue but can also offer a deeper understanding of both the function of the text in its initial context and the interaction between the author and his readership. Before embarking on such a monomythical reading, I will briefly introduce the European Journey and try to point to some reasons for why travels beyond the cultural boundaries, as an adventure to an unknown world, could be seen as closely linked to a certain conception of heroism.
Related papers
Venturing beyond borders, 2013
Throughout history there has always been cultural contact to a varying extent between those regions today referred to as the Near and Middle East on the one hand and Europe on the other. Despite political, geographical and religious obstacles, goods were exchanged, ideas and knowledge were transferred, people travelled and migrated across borders, while borders themselves changed their course and people stayed or fled over to the other side. In this sense the boundaries proved to be porous, but they became considerably more permeable from the 19 th century onwards. The reasons were twofold. On the one hand, developments in infrastructure and transport technologies, such as railways and steamers, rendered previous notions of distance obsolete. Then again this development went hand in hand with political developments. To an increasing degree, the Near and Middle East became part of the European political sphere while the relationship to the European states became more and more vital for the Middle Eastern centres of power on a political, economic and cultural level. This paper will discuss the influence of the Islamic religion in the ability of Muslims to get into contact with non-Islamic Europe as well as the role of religion within the perception of "the Self " and "the Other". Does an understanding of the classical positions of Islamic law help us to comprehend historical developments? Bernard Lewis suggests that a "Muslim worldview" based on Islamic doctrinal positions determined cultural contact with Europe and prevented Muslims from broadening their horizons. His line of argument claims that unlike for Europeans, religion for Muslims has always been and still is the essential category of identity and restricted cultural contact. I want to question the idea that Islam (as a normative religious tradition) is per se the predominant determiner for "the Muslim" (as a historical and social being) in cultural contact. I will do so by first discussing Bernard Lewis's line of arguments. This will be followed by a theoretical frame for dealing with identity, alterity and the mechanisms involved in the process of the imagination of Self and Other. By taking identity and alterity not as a feature of the entities themselves, but as a feature of their relationship that is determined by both sides, we may understand how much the "Muslim" traveller is or is not determined by ideas prefigured by religion. This will question Lewis' assumptions on a theoretical level. With this back
Venturing beyond borders: Reflections on genre, function and boundaries in Middle Eastern travel writing , 2013
The Ottoman-Turkish author Ahmet Mithat (1844–1912) wrote a great deal of travel novels in which the protagonists travel through the whole world, and many novels and stories that are set in Europe, even before he ever went there himself. While writing these novels he concentrates on different kinds of travel and discusses them either in the prefaces, declaring his arguments as the author Ahmet Mithat, or lets the characters in those novels discuss the issue among themselves. The ‘different kinds of travel’ are those mental travels done while thinking or reading as well as the real, physical ones done by the author himself. These discussions about different kinds of travel is to be perceived within a new perspective after reading Ahmet Mithat’s Avrupa’da Bir Cevelan (‘A Stroll through Europe’ 1889/90), the travelogue he wrote after his own trip to Europe. It is possible to analyze how Ahmet Mithat, while referring to his previous fictional travels in Avrupa’da Bir Cevelan, uses them as a discursive strategy to present himself as the expert on Europe and travel. What is to be analyzed in this article is how Ahmet Mithat constructs an authoritative discourse on Europe by mentioning the textual information gathered through reading, his imaginary world, which prepared him for his reallife trip, and the experiences and observations he made during this voyage. The main goal of the article is first to classify and define these different kinds of travel, namely mental travel, which includes imaginary and literary voyages, and the real journey. Having established this classification, by using the author’s own definitions from his books, the article aims to show the formation of the abovementioned authoritative discourse. Ahmet Mithat’s overconfident discourse on Europe is a product of the dialogue between the above mentioned three kinds of travel. The author, as the article tries to show, intentionally uses this constant dialogue to construct a textual support for his imagined privileged position. Keywords: Ahmet Mithat, Avrupa’da Bir Cevelan, travel writing, mental travel, Occidentalism.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.