Turn Taking in Discourse.docx (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Use of Turn-taking Phenomena and its Function in an English as a Lingua Franca Conversation
In the history of man, conversation is one of the most powerful tools that man has ever achieved since he became aware of it; and it time, it is also the one that has been thoroughly and painstakingly studied. In the course of time, man has learned, observed, developed and established different variations and ways of conversing in order to relate, to connect, to transact, and to negotiate with one another for the purpose of giving order and meaning in life.
Interactiveness of turn-taking in English and Japanese from the functional perspective
This paper focuses on turn-taking in English and Japanese talk shows and analyzes when, where, and why turn-taking 1 occurs. It argues that turn-taking is not rule-governed but interactive. The quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal that the degree of interactiveness and the functional distribution of turn-taking differ between English and Japanese participants. Moreover, these differences are related to the difference in the linguistic ideology of speakers' turn-taking.
Turntaking in social talk dialogues: temporal, formal and functional aspects
Proceedings SPECOM-2004, 2004
This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the turn-taking mechanism evidenced in 93 telephone dialogues that were taken from the 9-million-word Spoken Dutch Corpus. While the first part of the paper focuses on the temporal phenomena of turn taking, such as durations of pauses and overlaps of turns in the dialogues, the second part explores the discoursefunctional aspects of utterances in a subset of 8 dialogues that were annotated especially for this purpose. The results show that speakers adapt their turntaking behaviour to the interlocutor's behaviour. Furthermore, the results indicate that male-male dialogs show a higher proportion of overlapping turns than female-female dialogues.
Turn Taking Strategies used by Adult in Natural Conversation
This research is analyzing the turn taking strategies by adult. Conversation Analysis will be used to conduct this research. We will look how the adult manage they turn taking when they get conversation each other. This phenomenon is quite interesting to be analyzed since the adults have the ability to have standard conversation. That is why will analyze how they take part in conversation and what happened in the process of it.
2019
Teaching and learning are seen as the two sides of a coin. They are such inseparable entities that have been effectively used throughout the world to achieve maximum development. Teaching and learning can be formally or informally done. Among the four language skills, speaking is psychologically the most demanding. Acquiring communication is one of the most pivotal developmental milestones for effective interaction. Communication starts with basic elements, such as babbling and one-syllable words, and gradually develops to full conversations and exchanges. The learning and the development of conversation skills go hand in hand with the learning of the skill of turn-taking. This paper explicates the ties between speaking skill and turn taking. It further explores the importance of turn taking in spoken discourse and its variation among cultures. This study adopts the intonation discourse theory of Brazil (1992). The purpose of adopting this method was to see how the components of spo...
Turn Taking Strategies in Kurdish Casual Conversation
The Journal of The University of Duhok, 2021
The current study investigates the essential strategies of turn taking of conversations from an analytical point of view. The data were collected from everyday conversations, namely face to face conversations, of some students of Duhok University to identify the basic structures of talk in interactions in Krmanji Kurdish. Stenstrom theory (1994) has been chosen for studying the strategies of turn taking of casual conversation in Kurdish. The current study analyses the Badini Kurdish students (4 participants) in conversations. The study concludes that conversations are not always produced in a typical way. Some actions happen in conversation when participants communicate about topics. Participants constantly try to switch turns and therefore change from their roles as listeners to speakers, topic initiators to topic followers. Also, interrupting each other to take turns, or waiting till the other interacts and finishes his/her talk. Moreover, Hearers could make some sounds or signs to indicate that they are listening to the speakers
2020
In this study, we propose a conversation-analytic annotation scheme for turn-taking behavior in multi-party conversations. The annotation scheme is motivated by a proposal of a proper model of turn-taking incorporating various ideas developed in the literature of conversation analysis. Our annotation consists of two sets of tags: the beginning and the ending type of the utterance. Focusing on the ending-type tags, in some cases combined with the beginning-type tags, we emphasize the importance of the distinction among four selection types: i) selecting other participant as next speaker, ii) not selecting next speaker but followed by a switch of the speakership, iii) not selecting next speaker and followed by a continuation of the speakership, and iv)being inside a multi-unit turn. Based on the annotation of Japanese multi-party conversations, we analyze how syntactic and prosodic features of utterances vary across the four selection types. The results show that the above four-way di...
Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation
Journal of Pragmatics, 1985
Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson (1974) have described how conversationalists construct turns at speaking and how they allocate them in a systematic way. In this paper, we shall describe how certain larger projects are produced. These larger projects include stories, jokes, extended descriptions, pieces of advice, and so on, and are here called Discourse Units (DUs). We shall distinguish between Closed DUs and Open DUs. Closed DUs are activities larger than one turn-constructional unit and are accomplished by a Primary Speaker holding the floor through the course of their production. We formulate some restrictions which operate on Sacks et al's turn-taking model when a Closed DU is being produced. Whereas closed DUs are projected as DUs from the beginning of their production, open DUs are not. They develop as a DU by virtue of negotiation on the type of conversational unit underway. That is to say, whether or not the turn will be built into a larger project is more dependent upon recipient as is the case for Closed DUs. We try to show that the recipient design of turn construction not only operates through syntactical projection of a possible completion point, but also action-sensitive devices have to be taken into account.
Conversation Analysis: Turn taking marker in Catatan Najwa (Setia Pengacara Setya, Part 1)
Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018), 2019
Conversations are famous yet essential in people communication. There are a lot of things can be explored from the conversations since people brings cultures in communication. People also show theirs and others' identity in the conversations they have. Therefore, investigating conversation to capture what is involved inside becomes important. In line to the importance of investigating conversation, political news interview is also interesting to be investigated since it brings information to the public. It is also used by the politician to clarify the policies taken by the government. This study aimed to investigate the interactional pattern of the political news interview through outlining the turn taking organization. "Catatan Najwa" was chosen to be the materials for this research. The researchers particularly chose the episode of "Setia Pengacara Setya, Part 1" since the related issues became trending in certain period of time. The video of selected interview was taken from Youtube channel. The video was transcribed, explored and examined to capture the organization of turn taking. The result of the study indicated that the interview interaction was considered as high density since there are a lot of interruptions and overlaps. Although it was high density, the organization of turn taking can be considered as highly structured.