Елена Шварц. Войско. Оркестр. Парк. Корабль. Четыре машинописных сборника / Сост., комм., вступ. ст. А. Шеля, П. Успенский. М., 2018. (original) (raw)
Related papers
This book is devoted to the poorly studied early poetry of Vladislav Khodasevich (1886–1939), one of the most remarkable poets of the Russian “Silver Age”. The research focuses primarily on early collections of Khodasevich, Molodost’ (Youth, 1908), Schastlivyj domik (The Happy Little House, 1914), and selection of poems from another book, Vetv’ (Branch, 1917). The mentioned texts are regarded as consequent stages of the poet’s development. We took into consideration several aspects of the development of Khodasevich’s poetry. The first question of our interest was which texts of the poets of older generation (V. Bryusov, A. Blok, A. Bely) were adopted and revised by Khodasevich in his early verses. Second, the present thesis analyses Russian poetry of the 19th century in Khodasevich’s treatment. In Molodost’ the references to Pushkin’s epoch were rather conventional and emanated from the influence of Bryusov, who had the reputation of the follower of Pushkin’s tradition. However, over time the presence of Pushkin’s epoch in Khodasevich’s writings was becoming more significant. In the verses written between 1916 and 1917 a new kind of reference to the 19th century literature becomes visible. The poet’s development consisted in gradual disengaging from the influence of Bryusov and other symbolist poets, and in overcoming them through employing the traditions of the 19th century. The third important theme of the study is Khodasevich’s own evolution. In our opinion, the poet, being under the influence of the “younger” symbolists, had adopted their model of evolution as well. For example, the first stage of Khodasevich’s development, i.e. his “thesis”, corresponds to the “antithesis” of Block and Bely. The following stage of his evolution is in contrast to the first one, similarly to how it happened among the “younger” symbolists. Having undertaken the analysis of the poems written between 1915 and 1917, when aesthetic themes were replaced with social and ethical problems, helped us reach the conclusion that the third stage of Khodasevich’s evolution (the “synthesis”) corresponds to the “synthesis” of Blok.
КНИГОИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО «МУСАГЕТ»: История. Мифы. Результаты. Исследования и материалы
The Musaget Publishing Company: History. Myths. Results. Studies and materials / Ed. Anna Reznichenko. It is the first time in the Russian scholarship that such a brilliant polycontextual cultural and social institution as the Musaget Publishing Housewhose activities included philosophical, literary, and even mystical aspects has become the subject of full-scale academic research. Nearly all the articles and publications in this collection are founded on archive materials including those from closed archives and private collections which have not been just unknown, but also inaccessible to researchers. The book studies and analyses works of Vyacheslav Ivanov, Andrey Bely, E.K. Medtner, I.A. Ilyin, F.A. Stepun, S.M. Solovyev, S.N. Durylin and many others. The book is intended for general readership interested in literature, philosophy and history of the Silver Age culture, as well as for undergraduate and graduate students of higher education institutions.
Поэтика Бенедикта Лившица: Система стиха
Книга посвящена описанию основных закономерностей, действующих на различных уровнях ритмической организации текста в лирике Бенедикта Константиновича Лившица, а также особенностям их соотношения. На материале оригинальных и переводных стихотворений поэта рассматриваются его метрический и строфический репертуар, ритмика основных ямбических размеров, строфический ритм и грамматика 4-стопного ямба, ритмические особенности тематической композиции стихотворного текста.