Socio-Economic Aspects of Peacebuilding – Corruption, Informal Labor and Brain Drain in Bosnia and Herzegovina (original) (raw)
Related papers
Concluding chapter that summarizes findings from the book "Peacebuilding and Civil Society in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ten Years after Dayton", edited by Martina Fischer, 2nd edition, 2007, Berlin: Lit-Verlag, pp. 441-470.
2022
The peace-building process in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) has been more successful in the initial post-Dayton phase from 1999 to 2005/06/07. Throughout that period, peace did not mean a mere absence of war; it also reflected various efforts in support of legal, political, and institutional transformation necessary for the state’s recovery. However, the recovery of B&H was less successful at later stages, especially after 2008. Since that year, many have lamented that the country was failing, or is at serious risk of failing. The question is: why did two phases produced different outcomes in B&H and why each phase last for so long? This chapter looks at external realities to answer these questions. It observes the role played by NATO/EU, representing American-led liberal, institutional and rules-based order in Europe with direct influence on policies in B&H from one side, and the role of Russia, representing a rival geopolitical pole with opposing stimulus. It is significant to evaluate how these systems-level factors and determinants outline key pressures on B&H, as well as predict the likely course of B&H in the future.
Political and Economic Reconstruction in Bosnia-Herzegovina
2018
1992 ve 1995 yillari arasinda yasanilmis olan Bosna Savasi, Yugoslavya’nin parcalanmasi surecinde Bosna-Hersek’te siyasal ve ekonomik yeniden yapilanma icin uygun bir ortam yaratti. Savas ve buyuk yikim sonrasinda Bosna-Hersek, ABD ile Bati Avrupali devletlerin (ozellikle Almanya, Birlesik Krallik, Fransa) mudahaleleri ve Dayton Anlasmasi tarafindan siyasal alanda son derece karmasik ve parcali bir federasyon olarak ve ekonomik alanda bir cevre kapitalist ulke olarak yeniden yapilandirildi. Daha da onemlisi, Batili devletlerin mudahaleleri ve Dayton duzenlemeleri ABD ile Bati Avrupali devletlerin ve baslica uluslararasi orgutlerin kontrol ve komutasi altinda Bosna-Hersek’te bir “uluslararasi himaye yonetimi” olusturdu. Makalede, Bosna-Hersek’te yasanilmis olan bu son derece sancili yikim ve siyasal-ekonomik yeniden yapilanma sureci elestirel bicimde tartisilip aciklanmistir.
Economic Reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Lost Decade
2006
The article discusses the efforts to undertake economic reconstruction in Bosnia following the end of the war. It argues that, despite certain successes such as the rehabilitation of infrastructure and the privatization of the banking sector, overall progress has been below expectations. The study, accordingly, attempts to analyse the reasons behind the reconstruction failure by grouping Bosnia’s problems into four different challenges for analytical purposes: the post-Dayton institutional deficiency; overcoming political fragmentation; creating appropriate conditions for economic revival; and graduating from dependency on foreign economic aid. In this respect, it is concluded that the intersection between the economic and political dimensions of post-conflict reconstruction has generated a paradox: while huge amounts of economic assistance have intended to facilitate political reconciliation, the nature of the administrative (political) structure that was established in the post-war period has in turn hindered economic recovery and the creation of a unified economic space. Moreover, political fragmentation and slow progress in economic reconstruction have been in a mutually constitutive relationship in which the existence of the one has contributed to the sustenance of the other.
How Bosnia’s Political Economy Holds It Back And What to Do About It
Twenty years after the Dayton agreements ended its devastating war, Bosnia and Herzegovina is mired in a corrupt political economy that feeds its political party bosses and their loyalists while leaving the country’s economy in ruins, its governing institutions all but bankrupt and its citizenry in dire need. The first post-war decade (1996-2006) saw a spurt of assistance-driven economic growth and international intervention to create governing institutions, but little reform has been accomplished since. Stalled on the path to European Union membership, Bosnia and Herzegovina needs to find ways to limit the predation of its politicians, unburden its entrepreneurs, and prosper its people. The required stimulus can no longer come from international intervention of the sort practiced in the first post-war decade by the High Representative. The European Union expects Bosnia and Herzegovina to meet its entry requirements by exercise of its own sovereignty and will rather than by imposition. The will does not exist today, because many of those in power expect to lose benefits and even fear going to prison if an independent judiciary, free media, energetic civil society and truly democratic processes were to hold corrupt parties accountable for exploiting the public trust for private gain.
Bosnia & Herzegovina – A country in turmoil: Causes and Peace Initiatives
Why has the Bosnian War occurred? Why is the conflict still there? Which initiatives have been taken to address the conflict and what results have they produced? The writer is attempting to find an answer to these questions, by examining academic literature relevant to the case, as well as by referring on personal experience gained by research on the ground, on terms of the educational trip in Bosnia & Herzegovina (BiH) on January 2017, organized by Radboud University.
Bosnia at the crossroads: political reform and economic stagnation
Bosnia and Herzegovina held their seventh general election on October 12th 2014, in accordance with the Dayton Agreements. In a climate of scepticism and mistrust, no one imagined the country stood a chance of overcoming its political and economic stagnation. While there were several new parties standing for election, the voters, together with local and international experts, appeared to lack confidence that a new political landscape could breathe some new life into the somewhat rotten configuration of Bosnia’s institutional structures.
Twenty Years After Dayton: Bosnia-Herzegovina (Still) Stable and Explosive
This paper examines how fragile Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is and whether it is indeed in danger of collapsing, as significant amount of academic literature often claims. The research finds that BiH is not in an immediate danger of collapse. BiH remains peaceful, despite the numerous challenges it faces. However, it comprises an alarming amount of causes of conflict that have been mitigated because both international actors and local elites benefit from the current status quo. Thus, BiH finds itself in a peaceful stalemate, which is likely to continue until a structural change occurs that triggers the outbreak of violent conflict.
Transition Of Bosnia&Herzegovina Economy: An Example Of Economics Barbarism
Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2012
Bosnia&Herzegovina is in the process of transformation from a previously self-managed economy to a modern market economy. The process has begun immediately after the Dayton Peace Accord was signed. The transition package was based on the "rules of the game "of the Washington Consensus. We consider that an application of neoliberal economic concept in a war-torn country could provide nothing else than a disaster... The application of Washington consensus under given B&H' circumstances we consider as economic barbarism. In the paper we analyze the barbaric strategy of the international institutions and its consequences for B&H' economy and society. In our research we rely mostly on our primary data and research as well as on official World Bank publications. Our own neo-Keynesian economic development strategy supported by UNDP has been rejected by the IMF and World Bank in 1997.
Stagnant Corruption in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Then, Now, and What is to Come
2018
Bosnia-Herzegovina, a country recently torn apart by ethnic violence in the 1990s, remains standing yet has struggled for the past two decades to materialize dynamic reform from political corruption and has failed to progress to a more stabilized society. Matters of ethnic divisions, political corruption, and economic underdevelopment all contribute to a deadlocked society vulnerable to further destabilization. The Dayton Peace Agreement produced an environment fit to maintain political corruption with elite entrenchment and governmental deadlock that continues to freeze the county in 1995 and inhibits true ethnic reconciliation. Economic insecurity and high unemployment rates add to grievances in a highly polarized multi-ethnic-religious society. Nationalist rhetoric exacerbates tensions, and there is an overall lacking monitoring involvement from international actors. Lacking involvement from Western democratic influences of the European Union and United States is highly criticized and needed to actualize change in Bosnia. This research paper aims to analyze and answer the sources of stagnant corruption in Bosnia, with analysis of stabilization realities. First, looking to the historical roots of the demographics and grievances of the country from the Ottoman Empire, and most recently the Bosnian War in the 1990s. Then a discussion about the current factors that inhibit stabilization. Finally, to arrive at analysis surrounding European Union integration as well as the realities of the future. In the end, the unfortunate combination of corrupt leadership alongside ethnic divisions and economic underdevelopment in Bosnia synchronized with upheaval in European Union internal politics produces an environment immune to progression and change with little hope for dynamic evolution towards further stabilization in the near future. However, at the end of the day, this resilient country remains standing. I would like to thank my family for their supportive and encouraging nature towards my educational endeavors and exploration. Dr. Aloisi at Trinity University, Dr. Karcic, and Samir for inspiring my interest in Bosnia-Herzegovina throughout my International Criminal Justice class and academic study abroad trip to Bosnia-Herzegovina. I would also like to thank the SIT staff for coordinating and conducting a highly valuable academic program with links to several resources. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the participation of all my interviewees; their willingness to participate and share personal knowledge and opinions was critical for the success of my research.