Thrace, Troy and Anatolia. Troy and its contacts to the Balkans - FULLTEXT (original) (raw)
Related papers
Съществена част от сведенията на Тит Ливий от Патавия (59 г. пр. Хр. -17 г. сл. Хр.) за Тракия и траките отдавна са познати и изследвани в българската научна книжнина. 1 Информацията, която съвременникът на Октавиан Август дава за първите военни конфликти на римляните на Балканите и началото на римското завоевание в Тракия едва ли може да бъде пренебрегната. Фрагментарният характер на запазените текстове на латинските автори от ІІ в. пр. Хр., загубите на големи части от текста на Полибий, представянето на римската гледна точка към събитията са само част от причините, които превръщат изложението на Ливий не само в наличен, но и в търсен, необходим исторически извор.
Тракия и римските съюзници на Балканите през Първата македонска война (215 – 205 г. пр. Хр.)
Дни на науката '2021, 2022
Thrace and the Roman Allies on the Balkans through the First Macedonian war (215 – 205 B.C.): This paper examines all available information about the place of Thrace and the Thracians in the first military collision between Rome and Macedonia. The fragmentary and incomplete nature of the sources is emphasized. This is due to the fact that the Balkan theater of operations remained in the shadow of those against Hannibal in Italy; by that reason only fragmentary informationrelated mostly to the Maedianshad survived. Upon careful reading of the ancient texts an incoordination between the Maedians and the Roman allies is observed, which rejects the assumption for their participation in the Anti-Macedonian coalition. Their clashes with Philip V are explained as traditional contradictions along the borders of the Macedonian kingdom.
Die Reihe "Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie" trägt dem Bedürfnis Rechnung, Examensarbeiten und andere Forschungsleistungen in die Öffentlichkeit zu tragen. Thematisch findet darin die ganze Breite des Faches vom Paläolithikum bis zur Archäologie der Neuzeit ihren Platz. Ursprünglich hatten sich fünf Universitätsinstitute in Deutschland zur Herausgabe der Reihe zusammengefunden, der Kreis ist inzwischen deutlich größer geworden. Alle interessierten Professoren und Dozenten sind einge-laden, als Mitherausgeber tätig zu werden und Arbeiten aus ihrem Bereich der Reihe zukommen zu lassen. Für die einzelnen Bände zeichnen jeweils die Autoren und Institute ihrer Herkunft, die im Titel deutlich gekennzeichnet sind, verantwortlich. Sie erstellen eine druckfertig gestaltete Datei (PDF). Bei gleicher Anordnung des Umschlages haben die verschiedenen beteiligten Universitäten jeweils eine spezifische Farbe. Finanzierung und Druck erfolgen entweder durch sie selbst oder durch den Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, der in jedem Fall den Vertrieb der Ad multos annos, Magister carissime!
Troy History: LIBER XIII. The Expedition of Achilles and Thelephus to Messa
The Liber XIII of the Guido’ Troy History gives the link between Hercules which was lifeless in the time of Priam’s Troy, according the world chronicles, and the Agamemnon’ s leadership. The son of Hercules named Thelephus was the warriors of the Greek army. I research the Achilles’ and Thelephus’ expedition to Messa, and the catalogue of the Trojan allies.
Troia and cultures of Lower Danube. Some parallels of Late Bronze Age (By Russian)
The excavation of the hillfort of “Kartal” (multilayer site on the Lower Danube) has revealed a cultural layer with archaeological materials of the Early Hallstatt period (the layer “Kartal II”). As a result of excavation there was found a dwelling and different household objects of this period. Additionally, a large collection of handmade pottery was obtained. T wo ceramic forms are mainly discussed in the article – amphorae and cups with elbow-like handles. Similar vessels were distributed across the Balkans in the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. Results of analysis demonstrate very large similarities between mentioned ceramic forms from Troia VIIb2 on the one hand, and those from Kartal on the other hand. At the same time, there are some reasons to assume that these types of vessels along with another barbarian fine pottery started to penetrate the Troja region as early as the VIIb1 period. Some arguments pro et contra this hypothesis are considered in the article. The archaeological material from Kartal allows discussing the problem of appearance of the pottery with stamped ornamentation in Troja. It is probable that the model of spread of stamped pottery instead of incised one in strictly successive order in different Balkan regions needs of correction. The elements of imprinted ornamentation appeared as early as the period of existence of cultural groups with incised pottery . It is suggested that the stamped pottery from Troja has to be dated to the VIIb3 level. The article offers cultural-chronological position of the hillfort of “Kartal” among different cultures of the Lower Danube region. It is very probable that the “Kartal II” level has preceded to the horizon of Babadag I and corresponded to horizon of “pre-Babadag”
Тракийската кампания на Антиох ІІ Теос | The Thracian Campaign of Antiochus II Theos
The author presents a systematization of all ancient sources, which can be connected with the Thracian campaign of Antiochos II Theos. As a result he thinks that there are no indisputable evidences about a connection of this king with the Thracian lands, except his coins. Presumably he never makes war with the Greek cities over the Thracian coasts. Maybe the last were his allies, which were provoked the expedition against the anonymous ruler of Seuthopolis, as shows some epigraphic records and archaeological evidences. Key words: ancient Thrace, Antiochos II Theos, Lysimachia, Seuthopolis, Cabyle.
This paper deals with different meaning of the term Thracia used by ancient authors. The ancient authors as well as their modern counterparts, traced the territory of Thracia totally differently depending on whether they referred to ethnic or political boundaries. The borders differed from source to source. Ancient authors often used the noun Thracia in its primordial, earliest and widest extent as a geographical designation in archaized manner and meaning. This approach amongst other things has caused modern authors to formulate the pan-Thracian thesis according to which the entire south Balkan Peninsula was inhabited by Thracians. The author in this paper gives the parallel with Illyrians (Thracian and Illyrian both being demonym and ethnonym) and proposes to make a distinction between Thracii proprie dicti and Thracii vulgo dicti, i.e. between the Thracia stricto sensu and Thracia lato sensu, as it was the case with Illyrii proprie dicti – (Plin., NH III, 144) paraphrased in Illyriii vulgo dicti.) The author gives examples of using this notion from the Balkan Peninsula as a geographical name which etymological meaning was “the land or the cost”. This can be seen from Hecataeus (Hec., ap. Steph. Byz., s.v. Darsioi: ethnon Thrakion (Daorsoi was living on the left bank of the river Neretva to the Adriatic cost in Dalmatia). Apollodorus also used the term Thrakes for Histri on the Histrian peninsula (in today’s Croatia). These two examples evidenced that this designation had no obvious ethnic connotations, and should be translated as “Landers, “Mainland tribe”, or “Coastal tribe”, i.e. a tribe living on the mainland, or on the coast. This interpretation can be emphasised by data from Herodotus (Her., VII, 185) who describes the Thessalian tribes as “those Thracians living on the Thessalian Coast along the sea”. It was very well known to Herodotus’ audience that Thessalians are not Thracians. The borders of Thracia varied at different times so in order to outline the boundaries of tribes especially of the bordering, transitional areas and better distinction of Thracii proprie dicti from Thracii vulgo dicti, the method of Namengebiet or namespace areas can be helpful. By fragmentation of large areas (which is the essence of the method) rather than their expansion, the features of the areas may be more clearly established and then the limits of transitional areas between tribes mentioned in ancient sources can be detailed with greater accuracy.