Controversions of imprisonment and prisons (original) (raw)
Related papers
Problemas teóricos y prácticos del mantenimiento de convictos que cumplen condenas en recaída.
Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores
El artículo investiga las causas de la reincidencia de los condenados, y destaca los problemas para mejorar la legislación penal-ejecutiva de Rusia en el campo de la ejecución de penas de prisión para personas que cumplen penas en caso de reincidencia. Los autores proporcionan datos sobre cuestiones problemáticas que surgen en las actividades prácticas del personal de las instituciones penitenciarias de la Federación de Rusia en el proceso de detención. La atención se centra en posibles áreas prometedoras y los resultados del trabajo realizado para eliminar las dificultades en consideración. Los problemas se consideran teniendo en cuenta el análisis de los indicadores estadísticos de la Federación de Rusia.
CRIMINOGENIC INFLUENCE OF PENITENTIARY INSTITUTIONS
Facta Universitatis: Series Law and Politics, 2017
Referral to serve a sentence of imprisonment in a penitentiary institution is a very stressful experience for all convicted offenders. They are obliged to put an end to their former lifestyle and continue living in a penal institution of a closed type, governed by strict rules of conduct and featuring very diverse population of inmates. Due to the loss of freedom, many convicts are deprived of numerous privileges they used to have outside prison. In reaction to these " deprivations " , they commit new crimes while serving their prison sentences. For this reason, time spent in prison can be an important criminogenic factor. In the first part of the paper, author discusses the forms of deprivation in penitentiary institutions and their impacts on prisoners' life. Then, the author points out to the criminogenic impact of the prison environment and the necessity to conduct empirical research in this area. Finally, the author underscores the need to find effective measures to reduce the criminogenic impact of the prison environment and turn penitentiaries into facilities for genuine rehabilitation and re-socialization of prisoners.
Some Open Issues Concerning the Resocialization of the Convicted People
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2014
Today, it is rightly considered that issues related to the selection and use of tools and methods with which the resocialization (treatment) is realized, has increasingly become the main issue of penology. The issues that occur as most actual and typical will be examin edhere in shortlines. Usually, when it comes to general principles the notion treatment, deals with all criminal sanctions, but it requires the application of tools and methods specific to every sanction separately, depending on its specific nature. Given the more frequent application of imprisonment, as the most used measure to fight criminality, today, without reason, the utmost attention is fixed on the treatment applied during the conduction of this sentence. Therefore, not coincidentally also this term (treatment) is exactly identified with this sentence. Regarding this definition the need for clear subject-substantial definition of the notion treatment in general and its elaboration and processs ingrelated with specific ways of implementation and execution of certain penal sanctions is also emphasized. In this regard, fully entitled are those authors who claim that the treatment for thesentencesofinstitutional characterandthoseofnon-institutionalcharactercan not (and should not) be the same. Here it comes to qualitative substantial differences that require the application of clear means and methods, defined and differentiated in the realization of resocialization.
Actual onsets in the enforcement of the delinquents
Journal of Community Positive Practices, 2009
The increasing interest of the authorities for the efficient rehabilitation of the delinquents is also reflected in the diversification of the alternatives to the punishment of imprisonment. According to most of the penal researchers, the punishment has several functions: penitence, intimidation and readapting. The basic characteristic of the punishment display four basic principles: legality, equality, individualization and the moralizing role of the punishment. Unlike the retributive justice which sees the crime as a violation of the state by breach of the rules and where the punishment is administered within a real competition between the offender, on the one hand, and the state, on the other hand, the restorative justice is a philosophy which includes a range of human feelings among which the need to cure, compassion, forgiveness and pity. It involves mediation, reconciliation and, when really necessary, sanctions. Regarding the systems of detention, there is consensus among the penitentiary experts as well a historic experience which shows that the system of progressive freedom seems the best treatment for the inmates, being consecrated by all the penitentiary legislations of the European states.
Nowadays, it is rightfully considered that the issues regarding the selection and application of the tools and methods, which involve the individualized treatment and observation, are increasingly dealing within the realm of penology. This study will briefly review the more typical and current issues. Often, the term observation, when talking about general principles, relates to the knowledge of psychological, physical and social characteristics of the convict, but it also requires the application of specific tools and methods for each sanction, respectively, depending on their specific nature. Considering the most frequent sanction, which is imprisonment, as a usual measure to combat crime today, the greater focus is on its enforcement during imprisonment. Furthermore, not incidentally observation is identified precisely with this punishment. In relation to this, the clear definition of the term observation needs to be highlighted, as well as its elaboration regarding the specific ways of enforcement and effectuation of certain penal sanctions. In this context, the authors are rightfully stating that the treatment cannot (should not) be the same for intra-institutional and extra-institutional sentences. It is about essentially qualitative differences that require the enforcement of clear tools and methods, which are defined and differentiated in the re-socialization process.
Penitentiary System: Criticism of Legislative Drafting Technique at Three Levels
International journal of criminology and sociological theory, 2010
Both the organization of the penitentiary system-as structured within the legislative framework-and its practical implementation reflect society's representations of crime as well as perceptions of its prevention and combat. This work study will focus upon the Greek penitentiary system based on the prison officers' views and perceptions. The sample of the present research consists of 37 guards serving in Greek penitentiary institutions. The findings of the research indicate the managerial quality of the reforms attempted in the country during the last two decades. The major problems of the penitentiary system are the following: insufficient organizational infrastructure, overcrowding of prisons, weaknesses in administrative organization and inefficient care system. Additionally, the education and training of prison officers is insufficient. State policies should aim at developing actions which will take into account both empirical data and scientific findings. Penitentiary Policy Within the frame of a community's "responsive" procedures to crime and deviation, policy against crime also includes the legislative technique of prevention (Georgoulas 2003: 34). In the context of penitentiary policy, prevention is organized in two institutional stages concerning, firstly the social compliance of the prisoner-i.e. transformation of his antisocial behaviour by means of special measures "conforming to the rule of law"-and secondly the implementation of social policy measures to achieve prisoners' social rehabilitation. In Greece, apart from the penitentiary establishments, the first stage also includes bodies conducting penitentiary policy, such as the Central Scientific Prison Council, the Central Council for Prisoners Transfer and the local Prison Council, which make up forms of official 2776/1999). Prison officers are the executive representatives of the Criminal Justice system. Within this context, special measures are implemented aiming, in the first place, at tracing the social determinants responsible for the prisoners' deviant or criminal behaviour (in contrast to former penitentiary policies, which mainly in the cases of physical or mental disorders followed "the cause and effect" pattern considering individual pathology to be the endogenous cause 3 of crime.) In the second place, correctional intervention is carried out, so
Psychosocial and Legal Aspects of Penitentiary Work in Bulgaria
2019
The article analyzes penitentiary work and treats it as a possible model of prevention with regard to prisoners. Emphasis is placed on the existing legal norms that allow for the realization of this universal human right, as well as some psychosocial aspects in its application. The aim is to present the problem of the existence of a unified, realistic legal model for penitentiary work in terms of its psychosocial aspect, protected by law. The subject of analysis is the framework of the existing legal system, which has adopted the international legal norms for the implementation of penitentiary work and has become an essential part of the social life of the prisoners. The possibilities for its positive impact on this category of citizens are outlined.
The Journal of the National Institute of Justice, 2021
This article highlighted the specific nature of the execution of custodial sentences in the Republic of Moldova. Similarly, some theoretical and practical aspects of the current difficulties encountered in achieving the purpose of the deprivation of liberty were approached through the proper application of progressive and regressive regimes. Special importance has been given to the identification of the current regulations that determine the placement in different types of prisons with the three detention regimes. Also, this scientific paper draws attention to the necessity to carry out studies aimed at contributing to the formulation of proposals for amending the normative and institutional framework in order to enforce custodial sentences, including the current infrastructure conditions. For a suitable weighting of the necessary efforts in the process of applying new detention regimes. Thus, the legal analysis of the present provisions has attempted to make the present work useful...
A SENSE OF SAFETY OF PRISONERS DETAINED IN HOLDING CELLS OF PENITENTIARIES AND REMAND CENTERS
JOURNAL OF SECURITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2021
The article was inspired by the desire to broaden the knowledge on the existence of adult men just after the loss of freedom – that is, during the transitional period of imprisonment. The research was inspired by the specific nature of the temporary cell and the conviction that for many researchers, this area is almost inaccessible and the research itself difficult to conduct. The aim of the research is an attempt at identifying factors that may be related to the sense of security among inmates in the temporary cells of prisons and detention facilities. I have personally conducted three studies among men in the transitional period of imprisonment, twice in the correctional facility in Pińczów (2013 and 2016) and in 2017 in the Detention facility in Kielce. The randomly selected research sample includes 422 inmates. the author’s own questionnaire for studying the sense of security among inmates in the temporary cell of the correctional facility and detention facility also made it possible to examine their moods and a tendency to present oneself in an excessively favourable manner. In order to verify the research hypotheses, a diagnostic survey method and a method of statistical and comparative analysis were adopted. A factor analysis revealed that the sense of security among inmates in temporary cells is determined by three factors: fear of inmates’ threatening behaviour, fear of inmates and anxiety. It appeared that the first-time inmates in temporary cells demonstrated more Fear of Inmates than the prisoners returning to it. As far as the fear of inmates’ threatening behaviour and anxiety are concerned, there were no significant differences between first-time inmates in the temporary cell and the prisoners returning to it. Keywords: prison temporary cell; anxiety; fear of inmates; transitional period; sense of security; inmates’ threatening behaviour.