History in Ruin: The Reconstructed Aesthetics of Michael Stevenson (original) (raw)
2018, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art
Since the late 1990s, the work of the New Zealand artist Michael Stevenson has centred on reconstructed historical objects that resemble artefacts from archaeology, anthropology and material culture disciplines. As part of a broader sensibility of twenty-first-century ‘archival,’ ‘archaeological’ and ‘historiographic’ art, Stevenson and his peers have prompted much discussion about the legacy of 1970s institutional critique on post-1990s practice-based treatments of history and museology. What makes Stevenson so interesting within this lineage is his inclination to research relatively overlooked past events in order to problematise a clear line between historical perspective and aesthetic experience. Although Stevenson's work conjures the empiricism of the social sciences and the reflexivity of institutional critique, its nostalgic, fragmented, and multi-temporal characteristics hint at a contemporary treatment of the romantic ruin. Fascinated with the intersections of cultural and economic histories yet sceptical of periodisation, his locating of nostalgia within critical practice reveals the struggle to grasp one's present, endowing viewers with the capacity to reconstruct for themselves the significance of his own reconstructions.
Related papers
Archaeology and Museology constantly balance their emancipatory potential against their legacies as colonial controlling processes. Do archaeology and museums occupy a key space in contemporary identity formation? Are they not just part of the modern state’s inventory of attributes rather than public ‘contact zones’? Museums’ attempt to re-invent themselves as socially engaged places of memory are hindered by an embedded desire to catalogue, conserve and display objects and we must ask “why conserve?” Many of the peoples whose objects are collected and displayed believe in an encultured world in which the decay and death of people, objects, places and time was and remains expected. We need to consider how objects work and what their rights might be. Objects, places and people have typically ‘messy’ biographies that offer points of attachment for a wide range of sensory engagement. Archaeology’s two strengths materiality and context can productively expose significant ruptures in master narratives through archaeologies of archive that ask how objects come to be collected and displayed (or not) and at what cost. This wider understanding of the archive as multi-temporal and multi-sensorial can show how decay and history intersect with personhood, place and politics, demonstrating the Beauty of letting go…
Art & Archaeology: Uncomfortable Archival Landscapes
The International Journal of Art and Design Education, 2020
This paper conceptualises practice in the space between and beyond Art & Archaeology as a zone where disciplinary certainties and known practices are unsettled, expanded and re‐cast. We will outline our current thinking about heritage landscapes as places and temporalities for engagement in the practice of what Henk Slager calls the para‐archive. For us, landscape functions as a kind of living archive, however, following Jacques Derrida, we are sceptical of the privileged relation between archive, law and authority. Therefore, in this paper we will think through our interdisciplinary research in the context of the development of creative para‐archives, which facilitate new, affective ways of thinking and making by bringing together the previously unimagined. Responding to the challenge of the SARS‐CoV‐2 discomfort zone, we seek to surface creative practices, activate archival disruptions and expand pedagogical approaches to the articulation of uncomfortable archival landscapes. The pandemic has brought into sharp focus the need to re‐conceptualise visions of space, experiences of place and archival practices. During a virtual fieldtrip students accessed a range of materials from Scotland’s National Record of the Historic Environment. We aimed to enable the co‐design and co‐production of a virtual fieldtrip, followed by discussions about our collective conceptualisations of landscapes of discomfort. The archaeological fieldwork in the virtual realm provides a context for students to engage in desirology as a catalyst for deranging, re‐associating and re‐imagining the archive in creative ways.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
Untie to Tie: On Colonial Legacies and Contemporary Societies (ifa Digital Platform), 2017