"Death Proof: On the Biopolitics and Noopolitics of Memorializing Dead Facebook Users" (original) (raw)
Related papers
Facebook as a Tool for Producing Sociality and Connectivity
Television & New Media, 2012
This article investigates whether social media in general-using Facebook as an example-warrant identification of a new public sphere, another private sphere, or a different corporate sphere, as some scholars have argued. It is argued that social media platforms neither warrant a recalibration of Habermas' public sphere, nor a conscious blending of spheres. Rather, social media platforms form a contested space where private, public and corporate interests compete to produce new norms of sociality and connectivity. In order to understand the dynamics of social media, it is not enough to revamp existing social theory of networks, to polish up legal frames, or to reintroduce political-economic schemes. We need to connect these theories and come up with an analytical model that accounts for the complexities of the various interests interpenetrating the new space of mediated communication.
Ghosts in the Machine: Do the Dead Live On in Facebook?
Of the many ways in which identity is constructed and performed online, few are as strongly 'anchored' to existing offline relationships as in online social networks like Facebook and Myspace. These profiles extend our practical, psychological and even corporeal identity in ways that give them considerable phenomenal presence in the lives of spatially distant people. This raises interesting questions about the persistence of identity when these online profiles survive the deaths of the users behind them, via the practice of 'memorialising' social network profile pages. I situate these practices within a phenomenology of grief that accounts for the ways in which the dead can persist as moral patients, and show how online survival this case illuminates an important difference between persons and selves within contemporary philosophy of personal identity. Ultimately, the online persistence of the dead helps bring into view a deep ontological contradiction implicit in our dealings with death: the dead both live on as objects of duty and yet completely cease to exist.
New Media and Society, 2021
This article offers a conceptual framework of Facebook's sub-platforms: Profiles, Groups, and Pages. We demonstrate the crucially different affordances that these sub-platforms possess, and the various resulting social practices and dynamics that they enable. With mourning and memorialization as a case study, our findings point at emergent practices ranging along a personal-to-public spectrum of communicative functions and media uses: Profiles offer a personal quality, albeit differently for the bereaved's Profile and the deceased's Profile; Groups possess a hybrid nature, combining self-expression alongside public aspects, reviving thus premodern bereaved communities; and Pages possess a distinctly public quality, serving as online memorialization centers where the deceased becomes an icon and a resource for mobilizing broad social change. This comparative and integrated approach may be applied productively to other contexts and other social media (sub-)platforms.
Like, share, and remember: Facebook memorial Pages as social capital resources
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
This study focuses on users’ practices involved in creating and maintaining Facebook memorial Pages by adapting the theoretical perspective of the social capital approach. It examines 18 Pages in Israel, which are dedicated to ordinary people who died in nonordinary circumstances. We employ qualitative analysis based on a digital ethnography conducted between 2018 and 2021. Our findings show how memorial Pages serve as social capital resources for admin users. Admins negotiate Facebook affordances when creating, designing, and maintaining such Pages. They discursively position the deceased as a respectable public figure worth remembering and their followers, who are otherwise strangers, as vital partners in this process. The resources followers provide range from economic capital and practical support to solidarity and emotional support. Finally, we point at the perceived connection users make between visible/measurable online engagement (Like, Share, Follow), and cognitive or emoti...
Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning
2013
Online identities survive the deaths of those they represent, leaving friends and families to struggle with the appropriate ways to incorporate these identities into the practices of grief and mourning, raising important questions. How are practices of online memorialization connected to conventional rituals of grief and mourning? What is the role of online digital identity post-mortem? How do trajectories of death and dying incorporate both online and offline concerns?
Virtual Graveyard: Facebook, Death, and Existentialist Critique
Digital Death: Mortality and Beyond in the Online Age, 2014
This chapter explores how Facebook has permanently, though perhaps indirectly, altered religiocultural constructs of grieving by transcending their conventional temporal, social, and special boundaries. It examines the medium’s affordances as revealed through its use and the symbolic interactions therein, as well as the implications of both for how users relate to each other and themselves. After establishing the stakes, the chapter fleshes out how users can safeguard against falling victim to the mirage of essentializing identities on Facebook. I begin with a brief overview situating the contemporary culture of death and grieving that paved the way for its emergent discourse on Facebook. Next, I delve into the therapeutic culture that has emerged on Facebook as evidenced by the medium’s mediation of the grieving processes of its users. Following this, I then engage in a Sartrian critique of the culture of mourning on Facebook. Although other phenomenological accounts of how Facebook mediates the grieving process focus on what Heidegger terms “being-toward-death,” Sartrian existentialism is more suitable to the present ontological discourse in problematizing the nature of essentialism. Finally, I consider the implications that the paradigm shift of mourning on Facebook suggest about its emergent culture and how its deleterious effects could be attenuated.