« American Psychotrope », Revue française d’études américaines, n° 156, 2018/3 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Madness is Civilization: Psycho Politics and Postwar America
Institute for Advanced Study, 2008
This paper examines how the cultural obsession with madness and the anti-psychiatry movement’s critique of “normalcy” during the 1960s reshaped legal theory and the disciplines of sociology, psychology, and anthropology, and informed anti-war, black liberation, and sexuality and disability rights struggles.
LSD and the American Counterculture: Comrades in the Psychedelic Quest
Burgmann Journal, 2014
LSD shaped the American counterculture in its own image. The powerful drug strongly influenced countercultural ideas, symbols, fashions, and music. ‘Dropping acid’ was a rite of passage into the counterculture that helped to separate it from mainstream society. Psychedelic experiences also encouraged users to question and rethink social mores and fostered a sense of community within the movement. Some historians contend that acid and other drugs killed the counterculture, but I argue that LSD played only a minor role in the movement’s decline.
Psychedelic crossings: American mental health and LSD in the 1970s
Medical Humanities, 2019
This article places a spotlight on lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and American mental health in the 1970s, an era in which psychedelic science was far from settled and researchers continued to push the limits of regulation, resist change and attempt to revolutionise the mental health market-place. The following pages reveal some of the connections between mental health, LSD and the wider setting, avoiding both ascension and declension narratives. We offer a renewed approach to a substance, LSD, which bridged the gap between biomedical understandings of ‘health’ and ‘cure’ and the subjective needs of the individual. Garnering much attention, much like today, LSD created a cross-over point that brought together the humanities and arts, social sciences, health policy, medical education, patient experience and the public at large. It also divided opinion. This study draws on archival materials, medical literature and popular culture to understand the dynamics of psychedelic crossings ...
Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Neoliberal ideology immensely celebrated individual and collective freedom, yet fell short of realizing that freedom itself can sometimes be the cause of fear and anxiety. In seeking to “liberate” the processes of capital accumulation, neoliberalism essentially created a form of hypercapitalism: a relatively new form of capitalism marked by the advancement in technology, media, and virtual reality. This economic system lead to a fragmentation of social life by allowing commercial or business interests to penetrate every aspect of human experience, leading to, what Jean Baudrillard called, a hyperreal mode of existence. In Bret Easton Ellis’ American Psycho (1991), the notorious Wall Street banker, Patrick Bateman follows an apparent decline from a cynical misanthrope to a psychotic serial killer within the free-market hyperreal environment of the Reagan era. The novel portrays a nightmarish vision of freedom, the unbearable anxiety it creates, and individual’s psychological urge to ...
MADNESS IS CIVILIZATION: When the Diagnosis was Social, 1948-1980
University of Chicago Press, 2011
Madness Is Civilization explores the general consensus that societal ills—from dysfunctional marriage and family dynamics to the Vietnam War, racism, and sexism—were at the root of mental illness. Staub chronicles the surge in influence of socially attuned psychodynamic theories along with the rise of radical therapy and psychiatric survivors’ movements. He shows how the theories of antipsychiatry held unprecedented sway over an enormous range of medical, social, and political debates until a bruising backlash against these theories—part of the reaction to the perceived excesses and self-absorptions of the 1960s—effectively distorted them into caricatures. Throughout, Staub reveals that at stake in these debates of psychiatry and politics was nothing less than how to think about the institution of the family, the nature of the self, and the prospects for, and limits of, social change.