High-Frequency Gleaning and Usufruct Freedom (original) (raw)
Related papers
CRYPTOCURRENCY: EVOLUTION, IMPACTS AND FUTURE IN INDIA
new peer to peer trading through cryptocurrency in India played an important role in encouraging people to make investments and earn profits. Cryptocurrency were evolved over a period of time by Satoshi Nakamoto. Now there are approximately 1384 crypto currecy are available as on Jan 2018. The high frequency of ups and downs of bitcoins has captured the attention of many. Starting from a price of just 1000inJanuary2017reachedto1000 in January 2017 reached to 1000inJanuary2017reachedto15000 in December 2017 has amazed not only the investors but the government as well. It is due to this high volatility that government has issued the warnings three times i.e. in December2013, February2017 and December 2017 to the people not to invest in these bitcoins or other cryptocurrencies. It has shown both positive and negative aspects. Now a days this form of digital money has been started to be accepted by some concerns but due to the governments statements on its deregulated form it raises the concern of people. But when we see the same situations about the cryptocurrency trading in other countries we find that in spite of banns and licensing cryptocurrency and blockchain are still growing in these countries. The present research paper is secondary data base. The data for this paper has been collected through web and alternative revealed sources
" STUDY OF CONSUMER AWARENESS ON CRYPTOCURRENCY IN INDIA "
In the history of humans, they have used commodity as currency in Barter system. Fiat currency(notes and coin) is the mostrecent development, they were first used around 1000 years ago, but today it is the most dominantform of money. This wasn't the end of monetary evolution. Cryptocurrency isthe latest development is the monetary system. Cryptocurrency is neither commodity money nor fiat money – it is a virtual currency.Compared to conventional payment systems, Bitcoin lacks governancestructure other than its underlying software. This has several implications forthe functioning of the system. First, Bitcoin imposes no obligation for a financialinstitution, payment processor, or other intermediary to verify a user's identityor cross-check with watch-lists or embargoed countries. Second, Bitcoin imposesno prohibition on sales of particular items;This article explains what cryptocurrency is, awareness about cryptocurrency in Indian marketand, the factors which will help people in adoption of cryptocurrency.
The second roundtable brought together policy makers, the judiciary, financial regulators including the Central Bank of Uganda, financial supervisors, the police, cryptocurrency businesses and academia in critical discourse on the complex legal, socio cultural and policy issues of regulating crypto currencies and the implications of regulation for the wider meanings of currency. Participants agreed a number of recommendations and the need for principled guidance in line with the commitment of policy makers and regulators to promote technological neutrality, co-regulatory approaches, socio-cultural legitimacy, consumer protection and ethical practices that were fair, non-discriminatory and non-deceptive, and were underpinned by the principle of legality. To make it relevant to Uganda’s emergent tech enabled economy, the principles would be integrated into existing policies like the monetary policy, into strategies like the digital strategy, and into awareness-raising measures.
AWARENESS ABOUT CRYPTOCURRENCY IN INDIA
In 2017, the term 'Bitcoin' was searched 8 times more than the term 'Kardashian'. So what is the bitcoin? Or some as saying cryptocurrencies and how many people know about it and what do they know about it. Is Bitcoin the next economic bubble? This research is conducted to find what people know and what they think about the cryptocurrencies, this survey includes one's view about payment methods, about their preferred mode of investment, and their views and opinions about cryptocurrencies.
Improving pretrial justice: The roles of lawyers and paralegals
2012
"Using evidence from around the world, this book seeks to demonstrate that early intervention by lawyers and paralegals can have a positive impact on pretrial justice in general, and pretrial detention in particular. The evidence shows that early intervention schemes can reduce the use of pretrial detention, improve the performance of criminal justice personnel, lead to more rational and effective decision-making, and increase accountability and respect for the rule of law. "
ABSTACT This paper talks about strengths, weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of Cryptocurrency and its scope in India. Cryptocurrencies are considered to be profitable investment in long run. Because of its various advantages: Easy availability, No involvement of any mediator, Fast payments, Low transaction fees and Information privacy. However, Cryptocurrencies also suffer from some weaknesses. Security of data and cryptocurrency has been major concern. Interestingly, though there is lack of clarity about legal status of cryptocurrency in India, the country may levy Goods and Services Tax on cryptocurrency trading. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has proposed to levy 18% GST on dealing of cryptocurrency.
An Outlook on Accused Persons Right to Pre-Trial Release in Kenya
This research focusses on Kenya’s position and stand point when it comes to accused persons release or detention during the pre-trial stage of their hearing. The need to carry out this study was inspired by the lack of uniformity and extensive statutes to clearly guide judicial officers on circumstances that accused persons were to be granted or denied pre-trial release. Therefore, the study looks at this in-depth and also the steps that are being taken to address this issue as well as those that have been taken thus far; by various organs and stakeholders given the mandate to look into pre-trial release of accused persons.
Self-Made Boats and Social Self-Management: The late-Soviet ethics of mutual aid
Cahiers du monde russe, 2018
This article begins with the heroic stories former Leningrad residents tell about making their own outdoor-tourist gear out of illicitly obtained industrial materials. Reading these stories not as evidence of illicit circulation, but as expressions of ethical claims, I show that they are united by common assumptions of goodness, and argue that these assumptions cannot be understood through analytic frameworks concerned with private, acquisitive interest. Instead, I argue that they must be understood in terms of the “personal:” an idiosyncratic Soviet property regime that was not opposed to, but co-constitutive of, socialist property. Analyzing 1960s political statements, juridical arguments and media texts, I show that the 1961 Third Party Program reforms extended the juridical logic of personal property to personal ethical realms. Specifically, the Program demanded that people place their ethical obligations – to strive for the overall greater good – above their formal obligations to follow letter of the law. By framing necessary but unplanned transactions in the a-legal terms of “mutual aid,” this ethical stance helped the economy appear functional despite its endemic circulation problems.
Race & Justice, 2013
Living with a felony conviction exposes people to a host of negative life experiences, including unemployment, low income, and family instability. Pretrial diversions offer defendants a rare chance to escape this fate. Using data from the State Court Processing Statistics, this study examines racial disparities in pretrial diversion among men charged with felony crimes in metropolitan counties in the even years from 1990 to 2006. The study finds that prosecutors are more likely to grant pretrial diversions to white defendants than they are to grant these diversions to black or Latino defendants with similar legal characteristics. Disparities disadvantaging Latinos are only present among defendants whose most serious arrest charge is for a drug and who have no prior convictions. In contrast, disparities disadvantaging blacks occur among defendants whose most serious arrest charge is for a drug crimes regardless of prior convictions and among defendants charged with violent crimes who have no prior convictions. One possible interpretation of the findings is that prosecutors use racialized attributions, which are rooted in portrayals of black men as violent and dangerous and both black and Latino men as intimately involved with the drug trade, to reduce their uncertainty when making predictions about how likely defendants are to cooperate with and be rehabilitated by diversion programs.