On the links between positive religious coping, satisfaction with life and depressive symptoms among a multinational sample of Muslims (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 2021
High demands of academic life and social changes caused relatively high prevalence of psychological distress among university students compared to the general population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of psychological distress among university students and to examine the factors associated with them. This was cross sectional study involving 467 Bachelor degree students from various faculties in Universiti Teknologi MARA. Participants were assessed using the Brief Religious Coping Scale (Brief RCOPE), the Hatta Islamic Religiosity Index 1996 (HIRS96) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21). This study highlighted relatively high prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among the students of UiTM Shah Alam. We also found consistent significant association between negative religious coping with both anxiety and depressive symptoms. Consistent with the earlier studies done among Muslim samples, the positive religious coping is not significantly associated with better psychological outcomes although only small effect was observed towards the depressive symptoms.
Association Between Religiosity and Happiness Among a Group of Muslim Undergraduate Students
Journal of Religion and Health, 2011
Association between religiosity and happiness in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis Associação entre religiosidade e felicidade em pacientes com doença renal crônica em hemodiálise Objetivos: Religiosidade/espiritualidade (R/E) parecem ser fatores relevantes na adaptação a doenças crônicas, mas faltam estudos nessa área envolvendo pacientes com doença renal crônica (DRC). O presente estudo teve como objetivo investigar a associação entre R/E e felicidade em pacientes com DRC em hemodiálise e se o senso de coerência (SC) faz a mediação dessa possível associação. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado em dois centros de terapia renal substitutiva no Brasil com 161 adultos em hemodiálise. Regressões lineares foram utilizadas para avaliar a associação entre R/E (variável preditora medida pelo Índice de Religiosidade de Duke-DUREL) e felicidade (variável de desfecho), ajustadas para variáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas e algumas variáveis laboratoriais. Posteriormente, o SC foi acrescentado ao modelo para testar seu possível efeito mediador. Resultados: A maioria dos pacientes (91,20%) relatou alguma afiliação religiosa. Religiosidade Privada (RP) (β = 0,53; IC 95% = 0,01 a 1,06) e Religiosidade Intrínseca (RI) (β = 0,48; IC 95% = 0,18 a 0,79) e SC (β = 0,11; IC 95% =-0,09 a 0,15) foram correlacionadas a níveis mais elevados de felicidade após controle para variáveis clínicas e sociodemográficas. Quando SC foi incluído no modelo, IR (β = 0.34; 95% IC = 0.07 a 0.60) and SC (β = 0.11; 95% IC = 0.08 a 0.14) continuaram se correlacionando significativamente com felicidade. Nenhuma variável clínica ou sociodemográfica apresentou correlação com felicidade. Conclusões: Os pacientes em hemodiálise apresentaram altos níveis de R/E, que por sua vez foi correlacionada com elevados níveis de felicidade. As variáveis clínicas e sociodemográficas não exibiram correlação com a felicidade dos pacientes. Variáveis psicossociais como R/E e SC são possíveis alvos para intervenções destinadas a promover a melhora da qualidade de sobrevida dos pacientes com DRC. Resumo Objectives: Religiosity/spirituality (R/S) seems to be a relevant factor in chronic diseases adaptation, but there is a lack of studies involving chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to investigate the association between R/S and happiness among CKD patients on hemodialysis and whether Sense of Coherence (SC) mediates this possible association. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in two renal replacement therapy centers in Brazil, involving 161 adults on hemodialysis. Linear regressions were performed to evaluate the association between R/S (predicting variable measured with Duke Religious Index-DU-REL) and happiness (outcome variable), adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and some laboratory variables. Later, SC was added to the model to test the possible mediating effect. Results: Most patients (91.20%) reported some religious affiliation. Private Religiosity (PR) (β = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.01 a 1.06), Intrinsic Religiosity (IR) (β = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.18 a 0.79), and SC (β = 0.11; 95% CI =-0.09 a 0.15) correlated with higher levels of happiness, controlling for clinical and sociodemographic variables. When SC was included in the model, IR (β = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.60) and SC (β = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.14) remained significantly. No clinical or sociodemographic variable correlated with happiness. Conclusions: Patients on hemodialysis showed high levels of R/S, which correlated with higher happiness levels. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were not correlated with patients' happiness. Psychosocial variables such as R/S and SC are potential key targets for interventions to promote better survival quality among CKD patients.
2017
Postgraduate students face a lot of difficulties in their postgraduate studies and are more prone to depression. These difficulties include interpersonal relationships, academic stress, accommodation problems, financial problem, and lack of enough sleeping, separation from family and loves once, family pressure and conflicts, managing freedom and struggling in adjustment with strength environment (Chen et al., 2013; Jaschik, 2015). These difficulties if not resolved lead to emotional disturbances and trigger high level of depression rates among postgraduate student (Jaschik, 2015; Das & Sahoo, 2012). Depression is common among postgraduate students (Dyrbye, Thomas, & Shanafelt, 2006; Abiodun et al., 2006; Chen, et al. 2013). More than half of postgraduate students in America and Canada were being reported having depression most of the times (Dyrbye et al., 2006). Major Depressive disorder was also seen in 4.0% of Chinese university students (Chen et al., 2013). About 8.3% of Nigeria...
Religiosity in relation with psychological distress and mental wellbeing among Muslims
The aim of present research was to investigate the relationship among religiosity, psychological distress and mental wellbeing. The current study was conducted on a purposive sample of undergraduates and graduates taken from University of Sargodha, Mianwali sub-campus and Chashma city (n = 100). The sample comprised of male (n = 50) and female (n = 50). In order to measure religiosity, psychological distress and mental wellbeing, English version of Centrality of Religiosity Scale (Huber & Huber, 2012), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler et al., 2002), and The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (Tennant, Hiller, & Platt, 2007) were used respectively. Linear regression analysis portrayed that religiosity is significant positive predictor of mental wellbeing while religiosity appeared as a non-significant correlate of psychological distress. Data analysis also revealed that mental well-being is significant negative predictor of Psychological distress. Moreover, the analysis revealed that the mean scores for the females significantly higher on religiosity and psychological distress. While non-significant gender differences were found in mental wellbeing.
The aim of present research was to investigate the relationship among religiosity, psychological distress and mental wellbeing. The current study was conducted on a purposive sample of undergraduates and graduates taken from University of Sargodha, Mianwali sub-campus and Chashma city (n = 100). The sample comprised of male (n = 50) and female (n = 50). In order to measure religiosity, psychological distress and mental wellbeing, English version of Centrality of Religiosity Scale (Huber & Huber, 2012), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler et al., 2002), and The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (Tennant, Hiller, & Platt, 2007) were used respectively. Linear regression analysis portrayed that religiosity is significant positive predictor of mental wellbeing while religiosity appeared as a non-significant correlate of psychological distress. Data analysis also revealed that mental well-being is significant negative predictor of Psychological distress. Moreover, the analysis revealed that the mean scores for the females significantly higher on religiosity and psychological distress. While non-significant gender differences were found in mental wellbeing. Religiosity in relation with psychological distress and mental wellbeing among Muslims
Religious and Psychological Implications of Positive and Negative Religious Coping in Iran
Journal of religion and health, 2016
This study examined the religious and psychological implications of religious coping in Iran. University students (N = 224) responded to the Brief Positive and Negative Religious Coping Scales along with measures of Religious Orientation, Integrative Self-Knowledge, Self-Control, Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, Self-Esteem, Guilt, Shame, and Self-Criticism. As in previous research elsewhere, Positive Religious Coping was stronger on average than Negative Religious Coping, and Positive and Negative Religious Coping predicted adjustment and maladjustment, respectively, In addition, this study demonstrated that direct relationships between Positive and Negative Religious Coping appeared to be reliable in Iran; that Positive Religious Copings was broadly compatible with, and Negative Religious Coping was largely irrelevant to, Iranian religious motivations; and that Negative Religious Coping obscured linkages of Positive Religious Coping with religious and psychological adjustment.
Initial Development of the Iranian Religious Coping Scale
Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2011
This study aimed to develop a religious coping measure for Iranians comparable to Pargament's RCOPE scale. A group of university students (N = 185) completed the research measures. The findings of this study demonstrated that the religious coping scale developed for use with Iranians had five factors comprising religious practice, benevolent reappraisal, negative feelings towards God, passive and active religious coping. The study also showed that the different scales of religious coping had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability and construct validity. The results indicated that Iranian students used positive religious coping methods more frequently than negative strategies. The present research also indicated a significant association between the dimensions of positive religious coping, such as religious practice and psychological well-being. The results suggest that this scale may be useful to the researchers interested in religious coping within Islamic context.
Stress, Religious Coping and Wellbeing in Acculturating Muslims
Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2016
Situated within an international context of Islamophobia, this study examined acculturative stress, religious coping, and their interaction as predictors of subjective wellbeing in 167 New Zealand Muslims. A Muslim Religious Coping (MRC) scale was adapted for the purposes of this study, measuring religious coping across three domains of Cognitive, Behavioral, and Social MRC. Consistent with hypotheses: 1) acculturative stress predicted a lower level of Life Satisfaction and more psychological symptoms, and 2) Behavioral, Cognitive and Social MRC predicted greater Life Satisfaction. In addition, an interaction effect between Acculturative Stress and Behavioral MRC was found indicating that engaging in religious practices buffered the detrimental effects of acculturative stress on life satisfaction. Contrary to the hypotheses, however, MRC did not demonstrate a main or interaction effect on psychological symptoms. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to positive and negative indicators of wellbeing, the importance of religious maintenance as a resource for acculturating Muslims living in a Western country, and the implications for counselors working with Muslim clients.
This investigation applied a cross-sectional comparative methodology to examine the levels, predictors, and consequences of religious struggles among a multinational sample of 706 Muslims recruited in three universities in Israel/Palestine, Turkey, and Malaysia. Participants were asked to provide demographics and complete measures of religious struggles, satisfaction with life, and generalized anxiety. Three main findings emerged from the study: (1) In general, participants reported low levels of religious struggles; (2) Turks scored significantly higher than both Palestinians and Malaysians on religious struggles; (3) higher levels of generalized anxiety were predicted by higher levels of religious struggles among Malay-sians only, and lower levels of satisfaction with life were predicted by higher levels of religious struggles among Palestinians and Turks only. These findings suggest that the links between religious struggles and health and well-being among Muslims are complex, and call for a nuanced detailed analysis of the religious struggles phenomenon among this population.
Happiness, health, and religiosity: Significant relations
Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2006
The aim of the present work was to test for an association between, and gender differences in, happiness, physical health, mental health, and religiosity. Four separate self-rating scales of these variables with good retest reliability were used. The sample comprised 2,210 male (n ¼ 1,056) and female (n ¼ 1,154) volunteer Kuwaiti undergraduates. Males had a significantly higher self-rating mean score of happiness and mental health than females, while females had a significantly higher religiosity mean score than their male counterparts. All the inter-correlations between the four self-ratings were significant and positive. They yielded one high loaded factor. Though the loadings were all high (>0.51), the ratings for happiness and mental health had the highest loadings (>0.82). Multiple regression revealed that the main predictor of happiness was mental health. Mental health accounted for 60% of the variance in predicting happiness, while religiosity accounted for around 15% of the variance in predicting happiness. However, the self-rating of physical health did not contribute significantly to the prediction of happiness. Based on the self-rating scales, the current data provide strong evidence that, among a large sample of Kuwaiti Muslim undergraduate students, religious people are happier.