Synopsis of Eschatology in Judaism- in 6 teaching units with relevant documents (original) (raw)
On 29.4. I will start my 6 lectures during two weeks upon the invitation of the Berrie Foundation in the JPII Institute for Interreligious Studies in the Pontifical University of St. Thomas of Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome. Since there is no doctrine of Eschatology in Judaism the lectures are going to expose different approaches to eschatological themes such as different types of Redemption, a typology of the variety of Messias , Resurrection, apocalyptic thinking and prophetic performances. The chronological frame will be from priesterly- levitic approach in the Bible (OT) through the formation of the Halakha in its Rabbinical version after the destruction of the Second Temple. The Jewish apocalyptical narratives and Messianic thought emerged for the first time in the period between the end of the third century BCE and first century CE. In exile the Rabbinic Judaism became in the dispersion the dominant factor as a vehicle of survival. Messianism and any antinominalist movement were practically rejected since they would have infringed the immutability of Halakhic texts and its strict observance. The medieval Jewish Mysticism which emerged in 13th century Spain (Zoharic Kabbalah) was some what a secret outlet of the intellectual elite to escape from rabbinic strictness. In its highly speculative approach towards eschatological themes the Kabbalah was influenced by some traits of Christian thought from Latin Europe and by astrological science from Islamic regions. The sin of Adam and the imperfect creation due to the contraction (Zimzum) of the infinite divinity(En Sof ) called for a correction. Whereas the corrective of the creation in Christianity is taken over by a Messiah who is considered son of God , the Lurianic Kabbalah, which took shape after the expulsion of Jews from Spain, believed that the correction (Tikkun) could be done by sincere believing and Kabbalists devices such as theurgic action and special prayers. The antinominalist Messianic movement of Shabtai Zvi, which was neglected by scholars before Gershom Scholem, was an offspring of the Lurianic Kabbalah. Its claim to establish a theology in which the redemption can be achieved through sin and apostasy to Islam (Dönmeh) and later to Catholicism (Jakob Frank) is on one hand mindboggling but on the other hand a unique intellectual effort which caused a trauma among its followers. The Hasidic movement diverted the messianic drive into the person of the Tzaddik (Righteous) who lead with Charisma his Hasidic believers. In modern era the Rabbinic Judaism lost its dominant role, except in Israel. In the diaspora is only one of the streams next to Conservative and Reform movements. The Zionist ideology of making possible the return from Exile by human action with political means, caused a debate whether the redemption is on the verge to begin or even has actually begun. A dormant political Messianism emerged to a visible factor as a consequence of the 1967 war and Israels territorial gains. It is too early to tell how this debate will shape the future of Israel and its relationship towards the Jewish diaspora.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
2022
In this study, I trace the developmental patterns of Jewish messianism. Judaism has a rich ancient and modern history of rabbis who claimed to have been the Messiah. I focus on the Sabbatian movement because it stands out as having an unparalleled influence on so many people. Messianic movements have always had large followings but never with numbers like this. These included respected rabbis and halachic leaders who expounded on religious law, yet they endorsed Shabbatai Tzvi, and many even adhered to his ideology after his death. Although Sabbatianism is often just ignored by Jewish history, in reality, it was the mould which gave form to almost every Jewish movement which followed, religious and secular; including orthodoxy, modern Zionism, and even (or particularly) Chassidism.
The messianic concept in modern Judaism
Teologia i Moralność
The history of the Messiah in Judaism is a history of disappointed hopes. Again and again, there were salvation fi gures to whom this role was ascribed. But redemption from occupation and foreign rule, exile, oppression and persecution failed to materialize. Therefore, the expectation of the Messiah fell to the periphery of Jewish theology. This article examinesin what ways the messianic concept plays a role in modern times and what it contributes to describing the relationship between God and humanity in Judaism. The author intends to show the development from the abandonment of a personal Messiah towards the affi rmation of the prophets’ hope for a universal messianic age in which the duty of all people to participate in the healing of the world becomes central. What becomes also clear is: The messiah idea cannot be a bridge between Christianity and Judaism.
Messianic Jewish Theology: A Preliminary Typology
Norsk Tidsskrift For Misjonsvitenskap, 2019
This article proposes an eight-fold typology of Messianic Jewish theologies. It reviews previous studies and makes proposals for the development of Messianic Jewish Theology. It characterises the views of reflective practitioners within the movement of Messianic Judaism by summarising their views on God, Torah and Israel in the light of the Jewish and Christian theologies that have influenced their development. Keywords/Søkeord : Messianic Judaism – Typology Messianic Jewish Theology – Torah – Christology – Israel
The Messianic Jewish Movement and its relation to Torah - a theological field study
The Messianic Jewish Movement and its relation to Torah - a theological field study, 2024
This study on the Messianic Jewish movement and its relationship to the Torah explores the various aspects of the relationship to the Torah on the basis of 10 interviews with selected Yeshua-believing Jews in leadership positions. The selection of interviewees results in a range of different positions typical of the movement as a whole, which overlap in many respects but are often fundamentally different and sometimes contradictory. Particular attention is paid to the theologically based, divergent and contradictory positions in an attempt to make these understandable. After a brief introduction to the Messianic Jewish movement, aspects of the Messianic Jewish dual identity are examined and their relevance for the relationship to the Torah is demonstrated. This is followed by an overview of the forums in which Yeshua-believing Jews discuss their relationship to the Torah. The extensive bibliography at the end of the work provides an insight into a lively discussion process within the movement that is still far from complete. A briefly annotated differentiation of terms serves as an overview of the most important meanings of Torah used in the Messianic Jewish movement. Following this preliminary work, the field study is presented. A description of the research field and methodological reflections precede the interviews. In the interviews, the associations with the term Torah are first recorded and the conceptual meaning and use clarified. This already reveals some serious differences. The theological positions and understandings of Torah are presented with the biographical context and main field of influence, and the most important formative influences are named. The points on which they all agree are noted first, as they serve as a common basis. All study the written Torah and consider it, as well as the rest of the Tanakh and the writings of the New Testament in their present form, to be divinely inspired and authoritative. All have found a positive approach to the Torah according to their own definition of the term. For all of them, the written Torah and the Tanakh point to Yeshua. All agree that Yeshua did not abrogate the Torah, but fulfilled it. And all feel a responsibility as a Jew to the Torah in some way. With regard to keeping commandments, all say that no one can earn their way to heaven by doing so. G-d's faithfulness to His promises to Israel is affirmed by all, but whether the new covenant in Yeshua superseded the old covenant of Mt. Sinai, or whether it is simply added to the already existing covenant of Sinai, whether ritual commandments are to continue to be kept after Yeshua's death and resurrection and the destruction of the Temple, whether the commandments aiming at separation from the nations should continue to be kept, whether and under what conditions rabbinic halacha should be followed and what individuals do and teach in their families and communities - all this is discussed interview by interview. It becomes clear how different ways of reading and weighting key scriptures produce different positions. Just as the diversity of positions in relation to the Torah already suggests, the interview partners are divided on the question of a Messianic Jewish Halacha. But here too, the term halacha is interpreted differently by the representatives. At the end of the field study, the attempts to produce Messianic Jewish Halacha and the problems and points of criticism expressed by other interviewees are explained. The work concludes with a theological framework able to contain all the different positions and relationships to the Torah and some starting points for a possible Messianic Jewish hermeneutic theology of the Torah.
Biblical narratives,messianic hopes and religious radicalism:Jewish fundamentalism in our time
Thepaper examinesthe contemporary scene of Jewish fundamentalism, focusing on its two major wings:the separatist Ultra-Orthodox, and the more culturally accommodating but politically radicalZ ionist OrthodoxS ettlers and would-be Temple Builders.B oth those segments of Judaism have been demographically and institutionallyonthe rise in the last generation and have made their impact on the political scene,c hanging the character and image of Judaism as awhole.T he essay comes to offer an historical and sociological context to the formation, development and growth in numbersa nd importance of the two camps.Itpoints to the diversity within the two camps and relates to major institutions,leaders and theological concepts.Italso examines the meaning of the term fundamentalisminlate modern Judaism and points to the fact that while there are obviousdifferences between the Ultra and the Zionist Orthodox, there are also striking similarities.T hese demonstrate themselves,a mongo ther features,i nt he centralityo f scriptural narratives to the two groups,i ncluding the idea of holding as pecial place in Godsplans for humanity,and the idea of the imminent or eventualarrival of the mes-sianic times. Ag raduate of the Hebrew University and the University of Chicago,Y aakovA riels research focuses on messianic, hybrid, or radical movementsinc ontemporary Judaism and Christianity,a sw ell as on Christian-Jewish relations in the Modern Era.H eh as published numerous articles as well as an umber of books on these topics.H is book,
Historiography of the perception of “Messianic Judaism”
This paper deals with the question of whether Messianic Judaism should be considered part of the schools of Judaism and if thus Messianic Jews should be considered Jews. Messianic Judaism emerged in the 1970’s, when it started to replace the Hebrew Christian movement. Main literature on the topic is the book “Passing over Easter – Constructing the boundaries of Messianic Judaism” from Soshana Feher, published in 1998. Her opinions on this topic shall be considered and reflected on writings reaching into 2013.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
Judaism: Contemporary Expressions
Michael D. Palmer and Stanley M. Burgess, eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Religion and Social Justice (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 2011
The Encyclopaedia of Judaism, Second Edition. Edited by Jacob Neusner, Alan J. Avery-Peck, and William Scott Green. 4 Vols.: Brill. Vol. III: 1968-1986., 2005