Moldova: The struggles to build a post-electoral coalition (original) (raw)
Related papers
Oligarchic regimes in Moldova and Georgia, two different approaches from EU
The oligarchic regimes operating in the countries with which the EU implements Association Agreements have different behaviors that are influenced a lot by electoral calculations, the popularity of oligarchic elites and the EU's position. From this viewpoint, we see a striking disparity between Moldovan oligarch Vladimir Plahoniuc and Georgian oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili. They both have centers of control over the political systems, created verticals of power and can influence major political decisions without needing public consensus on such issues as the replacement of the electoral system. Nevertheless, the two oligarchs have a distinct internal situation and a distinct external image that determines their political path and the future government prospects. Moldovan oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc is yet trapped in public disgrace.
Difficult coexistence between civil society and oligarchic regimes in Moldova and Georgia
The failures by the Georgian government and Moldovan government, which are both coordinated by oligarchs, keep the local nongovernmental sector on alert. By the most recent approaches, civil society of Moldova and of Georgia requested to hold the decision makers accountable for the politicization and subduing of justice, substitution of the democratic government with the informal one and political clientelism, and violation of human rights. Both in Moldova and in Georgia, the NGOs highlight the collapse of the legitimacy of the government that during the past few years was in sync with the “state capture” phenomenon and “clan”-based governance.
Diaspora's power in the Moldovan Elections -Between Perceptions and Realities, OP-ED
The vote of 24 February 2019 puts the country in front of a crossroads whose character seems unfavorable. The main post-electoral scenarios are pessimistic because they indicate either the perpetuation of oligarchic governance headed by the Democratic Party, or the transfer of the epicenter of power to the Socialists. In any of these situations, the conditions of the opposition could at least be normalized. Faced with its now marginalized position, the political forces forming the electoral bloc "NOW" will be integrated into the process of influencing political decisions in the aftermath of elections. They will be able to oversee the governance from within of the formal institutions and make a qualitative leap in exercising pressure on governance, compared to street protests whose impact has been uncertain and often temporary.
Struggle against Russian propaganda in Moldova, touching of U.S. and European content, OP-ED
The assiduous further building of a more attractive and credible pro-European profile at home and abroad dominates the agenda of the government controlled by the Democratic Party and its leader, oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc. The affiliation to the European course requires yet clear political will and verifiable, consistent and complete implementation of reforms. For now, most of the results displayed by the government include the adoption of laws, but obstacles to reforms appear at the stage of their materialization into tangible benefits for the citizens. The inconsistency between the initiation of the reforms assumed before the EU and the superficiality in their implementation considerably diminished public confidence in the government.
(Geo)political scenarios for parliamentary elections of Moldova
Almost nine months before the future parliamentary elections that are expected to take place in December 2018, there is no clarity as to the profile of the future government – the political forces that associate themselves with the European course or those that incline towards the Eurasian direction.
Deterioration of EU-Moldova dialogue and calculations of Moldovan government, OP-ED
The Moldovan authorities fulfilled all the procedures for invalidating the Chisinau early mayoral elections that were won by the representative of the extraparliamentary opposition Andrei Nastase. The final point, at procedural level, was the decision by the Central Election Commission by which the elections were nullified (June 29, 2018). Consequently, Moldova’s capital city remained without a mayor with a full term in office until the ordinary local elections of the first half of 2019. About 240,000 votes (approximately 40% of the voters in Chisinau) and 14 million lei spent on the elections held in two rounds were wasted. The invalidation of elections repeatedly highlighted the massive distrust in the integrity of the judicial system that is accused of incompetence, political servilism and, respectively, political corruption. The created situation amplified the internal criticism (opposition, civil society) and external distrust in the government that continues to associate itself with the West, and generated new political opportunities for revitalizing the extraparliamentary opposition.
Oligarchs in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia as key obstacles to reforms
The paper reviews the role of oligarchs in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Oligarchy can be briefly defined as a system of governance in which a small and informal group of people, using their vast economic and financial resources, is able to control a state or exert a major or dominant influence on its policy. The portfolios of economic assets of the major oligarchs of the three countries is described in some detail. The nature of their influence on policy making is further analysed, in particular the disadvantages for the governance of these countries. While these impacts differ in their detail by country, in general terms they tend towards limiting political pluralism, capturing state institutions, corruption, monopolisation, and more broadly the blocking of reform processes. Oligarchs are symptoms rather than causes of weak political institutions. The remedies correspondingly need a wide reach, including institutional capacity building, effective anti-corruption bodies, suitable public funding for political parties, effective competition policy, independence of the judiciary and of the media, supported by many features of the Association Agreements and DCFTAs with the EU. Modern economies will always need major business leaders and enterprises. The challenge is precisely to bring the oligarchs into becoming normal business leaders.
A Useful Crisis for Moldova (2015)
For a long time coined as the success story of the Eastern Partnership (EaP), Moldova’s EaP leadership is now challenged by a series of problems that occurred in the reform process mainly due to corruption scandals in the banking system and in other important areas such as control of judiciary, public procurement, etc., which is a result of “oligarchisation” of the politics. At the same time, the domestic political crisis, along with the regional instability and the geopolitical confrontation in Eastern Europe, has generated additional tensions and polarization within the Moldovan society.
Moldova is an important part of the intricate regional situation in the Black Sea region. Redefining Russia’s role by the states of the region, created the prerequisites for bringing together the positions of Ukraine and Moldova on a whole range of issues, also it led to the resetting of Ukrainian-Romanian relations. Regional transformation was the basis that united the tripartite platform of cooperation - Ukraine, Republic of Moldova and Romania. The parliamentary elections in the Republic of Moldova, which will take place in 2019, will largely determine new challenges and opportunities for this format of cooperation.
Halt in EU funding versus uninominal voting system in Moldova, OP-ED
The Government of Moldova is determined to introduce the uninominal voting system fully or at least partially as soon as possible and at any cost. Thus, the bill to change the electoral legislation formulated by the Democratic Party was passed in the first reading, being introduced in the agenda, approved and adopted by 52 votes during only several hours. A similar swift path was covered by the bill on the mixed-member electoral system, which includes different components of the uninominal voting system. The latter, which was proposed by the parliamentary opposition (Party of Socialists) that is affiliated to President Dodon, was passed by the votes of 74 MPs.