TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP HUKUM WARIS ISLAM DI NEGARA JEPANG (original) (raw)

TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN TERAPEUTIK

2018

This paper examines the legal status of the parties to the therapeutic agreement. The problem in this paper is how the legal status of the parties to the treaty is therapeutic and what is the legal protection for the patient in the therapeutic covenant. Data were collected through review of laws, books or literature and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results showed that the position of the parties between patients and doctors according to law equal or balanced. This is reflected in the rights and obligations set forth in the legislation in the field of health. While the form of legal protection is also reflected in Law Number 36 Year 2009 on Health, Law Number 29 Year 2004 About Medical Practice and Law Number 8 Year 1999 About Consumer Protection. Keywords: legal status, doctor and patient, therapeutic agreement

TINJAUAN YURIDIS SAHNYA PERJANJIAN TERAPEUTIK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PASIEN

This research aims to determine the therapeutic validity of a treaty based on the draft Civil Law, as well as how the legal protection for patients in a therapeutic agreement. In order for the results of this study can be used as either a doctor or patient understanding in knowing the rights and obligations to be performed by physicians and patients. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that the agreement is an agreement Ispanning therapeutic verbintenis (based on business) so it was not the outcome, but a maximum effort to cure doctor patient who becomes the object of the agreement. Basic rights which are owned by the patient is the right to information in the medical consent includes the right to know of the condition of his illness, what action will be taken by the doctor, what is the procedure, what risks may arise from the action, alternative treatment besides medical treatment that would performed. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sahnya suatu perjanjian terapeutik berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, serta perlindungan hukum bagi pasien dalam suatu perjanjian terapeutik. Agar hasil penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai bahan pemahaman baik dokter ataupun pasien dalam mengetahui hak dan kewajiban yang harus dilakukan oleh dokter maupun pasien. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa Perjanjian terapeutik merupakan perjanjian Ispanning verbintenis (berdasarkan usaha) jadi bukan hasil yang dicapai, melainkan suatu usaha dokter yang maksimal untuk kesembuhan pasien yang menjadi objek perjanjian. Hak dasar yang dimiliki oleh pasien adalah hak atas informasi dalam persetujuan tindakan medis yang meliputi hak untuk mengetahui atas kondisi sakitnya, tindakan apa yang akan diambil oleh dokter, bagaimana prosedurnya, risiko apa yang mungkin timbul dari tindakan itu, alternatif pengobatan selain tindakan medis yang akan dilakukan. Kata kunci : Perjanjian terapeutik, dokter, perlindungan hukum pasien A. PENDAHULUAN Kesehatan adalah hak dasar yang melekat pada setiap manusia. Hak dasar ini tidak hanya diatur dalam peraturan secara nasional, akan tetapi juga dijamin dalam peraturan secara Internasional. Secara Nasional, hak kesehatan untuk setiap orang diatur dalam UUD 1945 Pasal 28H ayat (1) perubahan kedua yang menyebutkan " setiap orang berhak hidup sejahtera lahir dan batin, bertempat tinggal dan mendapatkan lingkungan hidup yang baik dan

PEMBAGIAN WARIS PADA MASYARAKAT JAWA DITINJAU DARI HUKUM ISLAM DAN DAMPAKNYA

Although Islamic law and Javanese customary law basically have similarities, especially in the type and status of inheritance, there are differences in the use and distribution of inheritance, the heirs, and the children. In this paper will explain about how the implementation of the division of inheritance in Java society. In terms of time of Javanese community heritage there is a system that is not in line with Islamic inheritance law. Islamic law is the process of transferring property from the heir to the heirs after the deceased is declared dead. And what happens to the Javanese community is the heir to distribute his inheritance before the heir died. Meanwhile, in terms of heirs as well as its part, the pattern of division of Javanese heritage that is with the system of peace or kinship.

KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Ismail. Langsa. Aceh, 2017

Corruption in Indonesia is so severe as social diseases, reinforced by corrupt practices exposed by the media increasing perceptions of corruption are like illness especially at the end of the New Order era even on the current reform order, almost everywhere. Starting from small officials to high officials. The results of the study indicate an important assertion, because the financial loss of the state is one of the essential elements of corruption in addition to unlawful acts. Thus, the criminal act of corruption is not abolished even then the element of state loss is not proven in court because it has been returned by the suspect, seizure of a number of goods. Barriers at investigation level, juridical investigators remain guided by KUHAP and applicable legislation, investigators lack understanding of the meaning of substance in UUPTPK especially in understanding the element "can enrich themselves or others or a corporation. It is suggested that the regulation regarding the minimum restriction of both the penal provisions and the penalties in UUPTPK to be eliminated because with the inclusion of these minimum limits, may open the possibility of imposition of criminal sanctions imprisonment and fine sanctions that do not reflect a sense of justice to punish the perpetrators of corruption. Anti-corruption laws will be more effective if only the maximum limit is imposed.