Rasa revisited as the Kathakali actor's taste of aesthetic pleasure (original) (raw)
Abstract
Traditional Indian aesthetic theory (Kumar 2010; Pollock 2016; Shwartz 2006) deems rasa as a knowledgeable audience's taste of aesthetic pleasure, and bhava as the actor's performance of embodied emotional states. This conventional interpretation of an aesthetic theory first articulated in the Natyashastra suggests the actor does not experience pleasure or rasa, and by implication, the actor's craft is primarily in the service of the audience's pleasure. If, on the other hand, the actor does taste rasa, as evidenced by Pollock (2016) through Krishnamoorthy's (1979) interpretation of the Natyashastra, then, contrary to the conventional understanding, a transfer of this ability from guru or master practitioner to learner, is at the heart of its actor training pedagogy. To transfer this very specific skill full ability, the master practitioner's actions need to be imitated precisely and not interpreted. The dominant western academic narrative of Kathakali's imitative pedagogy represents it as "mimicking", a quality for low, and specially not of the high arts. A renegotiating of the idea of mimicry with a more complex and nuanced "mirroring," offers up fertile conceptual ground for an investigation into its offerings of rasa. Practice-led research conducted by the practitioner researcher as part of his doctoral thesis exploring the teaching of Kathakali in Australia, offers original theoretical and practical insights into a transfer of rasa from master practitioner to learner, at the site of intercultural actor training.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (30)
- Balakrishnan, S., 2005. Kathakali: A Practitioner's Perspective. Calicut: Poorna Publications.
- Barba, E., 1995. The Paper Canoe. Routledge.
- Barba, Eugenio, and Simonne Sanzenbach, 1967. "The Kathakali Theater." The Tulane Drama Review, 11(4), 1967, pp. 37-50.
- Csordas, Thomas J., 1990. "Embodiment as a Paradigm." Anthropology Ethos, 18(1), pp. 5-47.
- Dalidowicz, M., 2015. Crafting Fidelity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 21, 838-854.
- Growtowski, J., 1968. Towards a Poor Theater. Simon & Shuster, U.K. Gallese, V., 2009. Mirror Neurons, Embodied Simulation, and the Neural Basis of Social Identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 519-536.
- Iyer, B., 1955. Kathakali; The Sacred Dance-Drama of Malabar. Luzac and Company, U.K. Jones, C.R. and True, B., 1970. Kathakali: An Introduction to the Dance-Drama of Kerela. Theater Arts Books.
- Kapila, V., 2008. Aesthetic Theories and Forms in Indian Tradition. Munshiram Manoharlal. Krishnamoorthy, K., 1968. The Dhvanyaloka and its Critics. Kavyalaya Publishers. Krishnamoorthy, K., 1979. Studies in Indian Aesthetics and Criticism. Mysore Printing and Publishing House.
- Kumar, P., 2010. Natyasastra of Bharatamuni. Vols. 1-4. New Bharatiya Book Corporation.
- Menon, Dilip., 1993. The Moral Community of the Teyyattam: Popular Culture in Late Colonial Malabar Studies in Social History. vol. 9, pp. 187-216.
- Pandeya Avinash, C., 1961. The Art of Kathakali. Kitabistan.
- Peterson, W., 2014. Being Affected: An Interview with Ong Keng Sen of TheatreWorks Singapore in Conversation with William Peterson. In: M. Laera, ed. Theatre and Adaptation: Return, Rewrite, Repeat. Bloomsbury Methuen, 165-180.
- Pitches. J. and Aquilina. S., 2017. Stanislavsky in the World: The System and its Transformations across Continents. Bloomsbury.
- Pitkow, M.B., 1998. Representations of the Feminine in Kathakali: Dance-drama of Kerala State, South India. ProQuest Dissertations.
- Pollock, S., 2016. A Rasa Reader. Permanent Black.
- Raina, A., 2015. The Art of Creating a Kathakali Performer's 'Presence'. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training, 6 (3), 323-338.
- Raina, A., 2017. Kathakali Mirror Box. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training, 8 (1), 61-74.
- Raina, A., 2018. Locating the 'Sociopsychophysical' in One-on-One Kathakali Actor Training: Reconciling the 'Old Social' with the 'New Social' in an Australian Context . Thesis (PhD). Flinders University Library.
- Ramachandran, VS. and S. Blakeslee, 1998. Phantoms in the Brain. U.K: Fourth Estate. Schechner, R., 1988. Performance Theory. Routledge.
- Shwartz, Susan. L., 2006. Rasa: Performing the Divine in India. Columbia University Press.
- Tcherkasski, S., 2016. Stanislavsky and Yoga (trans. Vreneli Farber). Routledge.
- Wallace, L.L., 2012. The Intercultural and Psychophysical Acting Pedagogy of Phillip Zarrilli. UMI Dissertation Publishing Michigan.
- Zarrilli, P., 1984. The Kathakali Complex, Actor, Performance and Structure. Abhinav Publications.
- Zarrilli, P., 2000a. Kathakali Dance-Drama Where Gods and Demons Play. Routledge.
- Zarrilli, P., 2000b. Embodying the Lion's 'Fury'. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts, 5 (2), 41-54.
- Zarrilli, P., 2004. Towards a Phenomenological Model of the Actor's Embodied Modes of Experience. Theatre Journal, 56 (4), 653-666.
- Zarrilli, P., 2009. Psychophysical Acting: An Intercultural Approach after Stanislavski. Routledge. DVD-ROM by Peter Hulton.
- Zarrilli, P., 2011. Psychophysical Approaches and Practices in India: Embodying Processes and States of 'Being-Doing'. New Theatre Quarterly, 27, 244-271.
- Zarrilli, P., et al., 2013. Acting: Psychophysical Phenomenon and Process: Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
- De Zoete, B. and Spies, W., 1938. Dance and Drama in Bali. Oxford: Oxford University Press.