Chartering Sustainable Transnational Corporations (original) (raw)
Using a recent innovative Oregon sustainable corporation law as a springboard, this article argues for requiring all transnational corporations to be chartered as sustainable corporations. Given the far-reaching effects of their operations and their uniquely powerful role, the global wealth that has been accumulated in these organizations must be fundamentally redirected toward creating a sustainable world. As a privilege of doing transnational business, transnational corporations should be required to incorporate environmental and social responsibility into their corporate charters-the document that sets forth the prime mission of the corporation and its directors, essentially baking sustainability into the corporate DNA of transnational corporations. To be both effective and to harness the entrepreneurial creativity of these organizations, the sustainable corporation charter must be implemented per provisions that require transnational corporations to develop corporate sustainability strategies in accordance with the guidance provided by the implementing provisions. The implementing provisions should also require that the transnational corporations monitor and report in a standardized manner compliance with the corporate sustainability strategy, with sustainability-related laws, and with nonbinding environmental, labor, human rights, corruption, and other sustainability-related standards. The sustainable corporation charter requirement should be imposed as a matter of international law, through an international convention and administered by an international commission. The requirements should be directly applicable to transnational corporations as a condition of doing transnational business. The commission should be authorized to take enforcement action directly against the corporation. In addition, both home and host nations to transnational corporations should agree to compel the corporations-either incorporated in that nation or doing business in that nation-to comply with the sustainable corporation charter requirement as a condition of doing any business. Nations that fail to join the international convention, or that fail to enforce the international convention, should be subject to mandatory trade and other economic sanctions by all signatories to the international agreement. We can no longer allow transnational corporations to aggregate the bulk of societal wealth and then operate in an environmentally and socially irresponsible manner. The proposals in this article are one step toward turning transnational corporations into sustainable corporations.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Legal aspects of transnational scale corporations' activity in terms of sustainable development
RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA, 2021
This paper discusses the legal aspects of the activities of transnational corporations. The relevance of the subject matter is determined by the significant impact exerted by transnational corporations on the world economy in general and on the economic situation of the country in which such corporations are registered as a subject of legal form of ownership in particular. Quality functioning of transnational corporations is an effective factor for the formation of sustainable development. This study reveals and determines the relationship between the scale of activity of transnational corporations and their legal status within the framework of both single countries and entire economic communities, the individual subjects of law of which are transnational corporations. The practical significance of this study lies in the possibility of identifying and stating key aspects that play a significant role in assessing the practical activities of transnational corporations in the context of existing legal law with the ability to use the identified patterns in specific legal practice. The results of this study can be of significant practical importance for employees in the field of legal support for the activities of transnational-scale corporations, who are faced with the need to deeply analyse the legal aspects of the activities of these organisations and provide management of such structures with timely, highquality legal recommendations regarding the correction of the activities of these organisations in the context of the existing legal field.
The Impact of Transnational Corporations on Global Environment : A Critical Study
IAEME PUBLICATION, 2020
Transnational corporations (TNCs) increasingly shape our lives as they weave worldwide webs of production, consumption, finance, and culture. Their ability to undermine or avoid government regulation and their rising strength relative to national governments have sparked citizen concern across the planet. At this juncture transnational corporations are not only playing a vital role in global economy but also acting as major factor in degradation of environment. The impact on transnational corporation on global environment, human health and natural bodies is severe and it is very difficult to estimate the loss suffered by earth due to illicit and unfavorable activities of corporations. It is true that for the growth of the country TNC is necessary but not at the cost of the environment. Environmental irresponsibility is one of the most prominent issues confronting host communities of transnational corporations (TNCs) engaged in the production of economic goods and, sometimes, services.
Transnational Corporations and Global Environmental Governance
Handbook of Global Environmental Politics
In the current era of economic globalization there has been remarkable growth in both the number of transnational corporations (TNCs) and the amount of foreign direct investment (FDI). The number of TNCs has grown from 7,000 TNC parent firms in 1970 to over 65,000 in 2002. And today there are over 850,000 foreign affiliates-that is corporations associated with a TNC-operating around the world, making up one-tenth of world GDP and one-third of world exports
The lack of accountability of transnational corporations (TNCs) for any harmful behaviour in the fields of environment, labour and human rights is a concern for the global community. Despite various attempts, neither the United Nations nor the home or host countries of most TNCs have so far provided any effective, binding solutions. This article argues that an important reason for the lack of advancement in introducing greater accountability is that issues such as workers’ rights, the environment and human rights are often discussed together. A new approach, one that is solely focused on protecting the environment, is desirable especially with the rise of new capital exporters. In 2013, China detached the issue of the environment from those of workers’ or human rights, in its attempt to tackle overseas corporate wrongdoing. Its environmental guidelines are worth emulating, but it lags behind in areas such as human rights. Analysing the position of the environment among the other fields involved in the debate, we first identify several theoretical reasons for detaching the former from an international law perspective. We then provide a comparative functional analysis of four extraterritorial corporate social responsibility Bills – those in the United States (2000), Australia (2000), the United Kingdom (2002) and Canada (2009) – all of which were rejected by their national parliaments. This lends additional support to the thesis that including the environment with other targeted fields stands in the way of home countries improving the environmental behaviour of their overseas corporations.
TRENDS IN CORPORATE OBLIGATIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW: AN OVERVIEW
Although Transnational Corporations (TNCs) and all other related forms of business enterprises are now generally accepted as non-state actors in international law, the extent of their exact responsibilities and obligations vis-à-vis other institutional actors like states and international organisations is still largely a matter of huge conjecture. This is particularly so on the question of whether or not corporations - just like states, individuals and international organisations - should have direct obligations under international law, and if yes, to what extent and in what manner? Meanwhile, the debates on the status and hence obligations of corporations, under international law, has been largely, if not wholly, anchored on the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and in relation to human rights. This paper seeks to overview how modern international law has embraced the arguments for integration of corporate obligations and hence CSR. In doing this, the paper, among others, examines the progression of the debates from an initial scepticism - if not hostility - to the present day gradual acceptance and recognition, under international law, of some form of socially responsible obligations for corporations. The paper notes further that despite the initial opposition to imposition of standards on corporate non-state actors, there appears to be consensus now that some level of international regulation might be needed in view of the complex transnational nature of corporate activities. The paper then concludes that despite the absence of mandatory international legal obligations for corporations under international law, the present favourable paradigm shift in favour of debates on such trend, as presently demonstrated, amongst others, by the United Nations Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights (UN Norms), suggests a brighter future in favour of well-entrenched mandatory regulations.
An argument for the implementation of the UN Code of Conduct for Transnational Corporations
The paper argues that the draft Code of Conduct for Transnational Corporations, prepared by the General Assembly of the United Nations over the course of twenty years before being abandoned in the mid-1990s due to the implacable resistance of the US among others, remains the most appropriate foundation for an international mechanism to facilitate the regulation of transnational corporations.
Pain, Gain, or Shame: The Evolution of Environmental Law and the Role of Multinational Corporations
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2009
The evolution of environmental law in the past century has been linked to the growing acceptance of the notion ofcollective global responsibility, which entails the notion of sustainable development. At the turn of this century, the focus in environmental law has shifted from the creation of a globalframework to deal with environmental problems to that of compliance with these frameworks. As a result, the primary actor of environmental policy has shifted from the state to the corporation. How has environmental law developed so as to encourage compliance by this new primary actor? Conversely, how has the corporation been changed by these developments? This article will trace the historical shift in environmental actors from the early beginnings ofenvironmental law to the challenges faced today. As the multinational corporation has become the primary actor, this article also considers ways in which incentives can be created for multinational corporations to behave in environmentally responsible ways.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.