Journal of Two Goseys, vol. 4, May and June 1814 (original) (raw)

Journal of Two Goseys, vol. 3, April and May 1814

Journal of Two Goseys, vol. 3, April and May 1814, 2019

Edited full transcript of the third volume of the jointly-written journal of two sisters, Ladies Charlotte and Mary Hill, covering a 25-day period in Spring 1814 and describing their life in London as celebrations take place following Bonaparte’s abdication

Journal of Two Goseys, vol. 2, February to April 1814

Journal of Two Goseys, vol. 2, February to April 1814, 2019

Edited full transcript of the second volume of the jointly-written journal of two sisters, Ladies Charlotte and Mary Hill, covering a six-week period, February-April 1814 and describing their life in London as the war against France draws to its conclusion

Journal of Two Goseys, vol. 1 1813-14

Journal of Two Goseys by Ladies Charlotte & Mary Hill, 1813-14, 2019

Edited full transcript of the first volume of the jointly-written journal of two sisters, Ladies Charlotte and Mary Hill, covering the period June 1813 to February 1814 and describing their life in London and Brighton

The Napoleonic Legend in Nineteenth Century Britain: A Comparative Analysis

This MA Thesis analyses hundreds of Victorian newspapers, periodicals, pamphlets and other media to investigate how Victorian perceptions of Napoleon I affected perceptions of Napoleon III and vice versa. It is argued that Victorian Britons frequently viewed Napoleon III through the lens of Napoleon I with significant consequences for the legacies of both Emperors today. Through analysis of letters to the editor and newspapers which appealed to all classes of society, this thesis does not produce a history of ‘Great Men’ from the top-down but rather an analysis of how such men were perceived from the bottom up and how popular perceptions helped shape their legacies. Why is it that Napoleon I, once the most hated and feared enemy of Britain, has obtained an almost celebrity-like status in Britain today whilst Napoleon III, the friend of Queen Victoria and champion of the entente cordiale is largely forgotten by the general public? The answer, this thesis argues, can be found in Victorian perceptions of both Napoleons, and in the resulting perceptions of themselves.

‘Wearing the Breeches’? Almack’s, the Female Patroness, and Public Femininityc.1764–1848

Women's History Review, 2016

Almack's, a mixed-sex establishment run by a group of female patronesses was a popular meeting place for the aristocracy in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Yet, despite its contemporary appeal, the establishment has received little attention from historians. This article addresses this absence, exploring the varying, and often contentious, social, cultural and political functions and meanings the establishment held. Building on recent historiographical developments, this article demonstrates how certain aristocratic women were able to exercise power and influence at the heart of their class. In doing so, it considers the intersections between gender, urban space and political culture. It argues that the activities of the female patronesses was often highly contested, exposing the narrow, and often blurred, line between legitimate and illegitimate action. * In May 1819, the Duke of Wellington had a ticket to attend one of the exclusive Wednesday night balls at Almack's, a 'club' on King Street, in the heart of London's West-End. That year, Almack's 2 was enjoying one of its most popular seasons and the female patronesses who controlled admission were gaining a reputation for their fierce selection process. As the Duke ascended the staircase which fed into the ballroom, the guardian of the establishment turned him away⎯'Your Grace cannot be admitted in trousers'. Trousers, in fashion following their adoption by the Prince Regent, 3 had not yet been embraced by the patronesses. A fortnight before the Duke's visit, the newspapers had reported that the patronesses would 'prevent Gentleman in Trowsers [sic] and Cossacks to the balls on Wednesdays⎯at the same time allowing an exception to those Gentleman who maybe knock-knee'd, or otherwise unfortunately deformed'. Being, one presumes in possession of a good 4 pair of legs, the Duke, did not qualify for an exemption. Almost as soon the Duke headed back down Piccadilly to Apsley House, the episode began to generate commentary. Within a few days The Morning Chronicle had printed a satirical verse aimed at the patronesses: Tired of our trousers are ye grown? But since to them your anger reaches,

V I D E S Given a free rein? Representations of power in the stables at Houghton Hall, Norfolk, and John Wootton's Sir Robert Walpole with his Hunter and Groom

When Sir Robert Walpole first rose to political power from humble origins, he had much to prove to the world. In order to consolidate his position as Prime Minister against the backdrop of the new Hanoverian dynasty, Walpole capitalised on extravagant displays of power, impressing political peers and local squires alike by inviting them for entertainment and hunting at his estate at Houghton Hall, Norfolk. This was hardly coincidental: although relatively unexplored in scholarship, historically, horses served as vehicles to showcase a man's elite social standing and ability to govern. However, it was also important for Walpole to recognise the limits of his power in order to demonstrate that he was no threat to the monarchy. This study examines the stable architecture at Houghton Hall and the equestrian portrait of Walpole by John Wootton (1726) in order to demonstrate the extent to which equestrian representations could function as a metaphor for both power and submission, which is particularly pertinent when applied to the hierarchical relations between Prime Minister and King.

Horseracing and the British, 1919-39

Choice Reviews Online, 2003

H orseracing has a powerful claim to be Britain's leading interwar sport. Cricket had its adherents; indeed, Jack Williams, the historian of interwar cricket, shows that its supporters presented it as the English 'national game'. 1 But British racegoers claimed that racing was 'our real national sport'. 2 On the basis of active participation, cricket was certainly superior with somewhere between 200,000 and 400,000 playing each week in the early 1930s, although football had even more participants, with 37,000 clubs affiliated to the Football Association by 1937, and many others unaffiliated. In terms of spectatorship, First Division soccer attracted average crowds of over 30,000 in 1938-39, but cricket only got large crowds for test matches and a few important county matches, and these probably never exceeded 50,000 in a single day. Such figures were dwarfed by the crowds attracted to racing's 'national' events: the Grand National, the Derby, 'Royal' Ascot and the Doncaster St Leger. Even small racemeetings got higher crowds than most country cricket games. If a third criterion, interest in betting on the sport, was included, horseracing was supreme, although football pools and greyhound racing were also important. It was racing, not cricket or soccer, which really sold newspapers across Britain. Widespread public interest in results, longer traditions, its year-round season and largest crowds, all support racing's claims as Britain's leading national sport. Yet Ross McKibbin's critically well-received book on classes and cultures in England between 1918 and 1951 marginalised racing, arguing that: Horseracing was a national sport only by a somewhat skewed definition of 'national'. What made it 'national' was popular betting which linked a mass of working-class betters to a sport which was, in fact, aristocratic-plutocratic. Without betting it would have been no more national than 12-metre yachting or deer hunting … many had little interest in horses or horseracing as such. The middle class as a whole and the sober, serious working class were even more indifferent, even hostile. 3 was strongly anti-racing but its numbers, never large, were dropping, while the Church of England was divided and the Roman Catholic Church showed little opposition. Although Labour and Liberal activists and politicians were generally negative, racing was popular amongst many of their voters. The Civil Service, formerly opposed to betting, was split. The Home Office was opposed, but the Customs and Excise and Post Office departments both encouraged it as a useful source of revenue. As the popularity of betting and racing rose, debates over their meaning and importance faded. By the 1930s interest in and support for racing could be found right across the social scale. Increasingly it seemed exciting yet safe. Those worried about class revolution entered racing in large numbers because it had traditional and conservative features. This fascinating variation of views provided a starting point for this study. Popular images of the interwar years have focused largely on mass unemployment, the General Strike, increasing government control, or improved welfare and education. Yet the period also saw a major spurt of growth in leisure, recreation and sport. Mass unemployment and business depression coexisted with increased standards of living within some sectors and for some social groups, creating tensions and opportunities which heightened and transformed social attitudes to leisure. Britain was the originator of much modern sport, and in turn sport was a paradigm of British culture. Historians have been slow to develop an understanding of the way sports influenced and were influenced by the cultural, social and economic changes of the interwar years, a sporting era aptly described by Sir Derek Birley as 'confusing and sometimes contentious', with key continuities alongside a strengthening of professionalism and commercialism. 9 This ambiguity about the treatment of interwar leisure and sport as a whole has not been aided by the potentially problematic role of social class in sport. Sports were differentially presented as 'upper class', 'middle class' or 'working class' in different social contexts. Sport could both unite and divide. Professionalism and amateurism, gender roles, commercialism, and the extent to which physical violence or active support was acceptable were all issues of debate. Sport was popular throughout the class structure of much of Britain, although some of its manifestations were very unpopular with a minority. Class as culture is a complex manifestation, and its visions were socially constructed. The picture sports provided was highly complex, subtle and more nuanced than historians have admitted. For example, some at least amongst the middle classes were always attracted, for a variety of reasons, to more supposedly 'workingclass' sports, including those sports like racing associated with drink and gambling. This could be due to earlier working-class origins, the attractions of More importantly, it helps to move forward our understanding of the ways in which social class, gender, culture and leisure related to each other during this period. McKibbin argues that interwar Britain was characterised by a major divide between manual and non-manual workers, and that leisure, lifestyle and employment created subcultures which he calls 'working-class culture' and 'middle-class culture'. Yet at the same time he accepts that 'England had no common culture, rather a set of overlapping ones', although the sports played and watched were partially at least self-enclosed and determined by class. 11 The social theorist W. G. Runciman sees the cultural gulf between the two major social groups, the working and middle classes, as important in terms of selfascription, but he attaches more importance to employment conditions and self-ascribed status. 12 In leisure terms, Cunningham's picture of overlapping leisure cultures in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is potentially useful, discriminating as it does an upper-class 'leisure' class, 'urban middleclass' and 'artisan' cultures, separate 'religious' and 'rationalist' 'reformist' leisure cultures, 'rural' and 'urban' popular culture forms. But Cunningham has been criticised both for an overly-simplistic picture of middle-class leisure, and for underestimating the extent to which cultural roles in particular leisure contexts were fluid. 13 It is becoming increasingly clear that while social distinctions were still expressed in class terms, social roles were increasingly dependent on leisure contexts. 14 A polarised dichotomous view of class might be embraced at work but not in wider leisure relationships. There might be strong consciousness of status divisions within a middle-class group, yet the group might present a solid face to the world. The spatial aspects of class, expressed in the more middle-class ethos of the suburbs, and the more working-class feel of terraced city streets or newly-built council estates, clearly had their effects. But there were manual labourers in the suburbs, and clerks in city streets, embracing or standing against locally dominant cultural practices like betting. Racing has often been seen as a sport which united the top and bottom of British society. Certainly in part, but only in part, racing was a sport which relied on the continued persistence of working-class deference, and a strong emphasis on rank and status within the sport, helping it sustain a clear rearguard defence of hierarchy. Runciman has presented powerful arguments that fundamental, societal-level changes in social, economic and political practice, and resultant shifting patterns of class, were a result of the First World War, arguing that notions of natural hierarchy were under attack from 1915 onwards. 15 Yet gentlemanliness, and its characteristic sporting amateurism, still complex geographical divisions between north and south, and between the middle classes in competing regions or cities such as Liverpool and Manchester. So in what ways were the middle classes involved in racing? Were they, as McKibbin has suggested, indifferent or even hostile? Not so. In fact the middle classes were increasingly supportive, taking part as spectators, owners, trainers and investors, occupying professional roles in racing's administration, placing bets or heading bookmaking firms. For some, with anti-working-class attitudes, often coupling snobbery and wish-fulfilment, it was the upper-class owners from which they took their model. Others were prepared sometimes to move across what were in reality by this period, highly porous divisions between classes, and between 'roughs' and 'respectables', to enjoy racing's liminal pleasures. Betting could be presented as essentially modernistic, and the reliable, known salary of the middle classes, stepped by age and promotion, allowed them to indulge betting, ownership or spectatorship as a leisure habit. Although the separation of suburban home and work sometimes confined sociability, people in many middle-class occupations, from industrialists to merchants, lawyers to shopkeepers, were able to attend nearby race meetings a few times a year. The bulk of racehorse owners were middle class. Others derived substantial incomes from economic activities which ministered to the needs of the racing world. In terms of academic racing historiography the interwar period has been addressed only en passant in histories covering longer time periods and emphasising economic rather that cultural features. Wray Vamplew's well-researched The Turf focused on regulation of the sport, changes in transport, betting and bookmakers, ownership and breeding, and the lives of jockeys and trainers, covering the last two hundred years. 20 It could profitably be read in conjunction with my recent culturally-oriented study of flat racing from 1790 to 1914. 21 The economic...

Transnational Affinities and Invented Traditions: The Napoleonic Wars in British and Hanoverian Memory, 1815-1915, English Historical Review 127 (2012): 1404-34. (Winner of the Royal Historical Society’s Alexander Prize)

Thomas Hardy, arguably the foremost English novelist of the early twentieth century, often drew on the past for inspiration. He spent long hours in the British Museum researching accounts of the Napoleonic Wars, so as to lend an air of authenticity to the historical backdrop of his writings. Although Hardy's trademark descriptions of life in the fictitious county of Wessex are quintessentially English, they also reflect a fascination with the real-life German recruits who had left their fatherland to fight Napoleon under British colours. in contrast to a plethora of earlier Jacobite, Whig and Radical pamphleteers, he did not see the stationing of foreign mercenaries on British soil as an oppressive threat to the liberties of the English people, but rather imagined the King's German Legion (1803-16) as a benign, albeit exotic, experiment in transnational bonding. A novella in which he first developed this idea, The Melancholy Hussar of the German Legion (1890), tells the story of a young woman who falls unhappily in love with a glamorous corporal of the eponymous unit, an 'ideal being … with none of the appurtenances of an ordinary house dweller'. 1 The tale of the two lovers struck a chord with newspaper publishers, who considered it commercial enough to be advertised as a 'brilliant story of the last century'. 2 The Melancholy Hussar betrayed subtle traces of the transnational cultural contact that the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (1792-1815) had left behind in the British imagination. The apparent longevity of this memory and Hardy's contextualisation of his story in a literary discourse of melancholic loss interlock with historians' claims about the singular historical significance of the war experience. 3 For Reinhart Koselleck, the Revolutionary period heralded a decline of

The Duchess of Devonshire: 1757-1806

2010

This essay is an exercise in historiography, utilizing Amanda Foreman's biography of the Duchess of Devonshire as its case study. It examines the life and works of the Duchess as portrayed in diverse mediums.

Genres of evidence: Reading facts in England from archives, historiography and literature, 1770--1830

2008

This dissertation would have been impossible without the wisdom and kindness of Marjorie Levinson and Adela Pinch. For reminding me that I should always do what feels right, even when it feels almost impossible; for providing two amazing models of intellectual and personal integrity; for making sure my enjoyment of the work was never diminished, I can never thank them enough. I am immensely grateful to Vivasvan Soni for his unrelenting and unmitigated candor about the pleasures and the anxieties of persisting with the work before the path is clear. Thomas Trautmann is the gentlest and the most generous of rigorous critics that I have ever met. Before I could ever write the dissertation, Simon Gikandi, Valerie Traub, Gregg Crane and Jan Burgess helped me to learn how each phase of my graduate career would lead to the next. At the University of Texas at Arlington, Rajani Sudan, Stacy Alaimo and Tim Morris reminded me what it meant to seek pleasure in texts and the company of people who study them.

Joseph Bonaparte and the "Réunion de famille? of 1832-33

Napoleonica La Revue, 2010

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour La Fondation Napoléon. © La Fondation Napoléon. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.