SETTLEMENTS OF THE TIME OF THE KHAZAR KHAGANATE (8TH-10TH CENTURIES) IN THE EASTERN CRIMEA AND THE NORTHERN AZOV REGION AND THEIR POTTERY COMPLEX (original) (raw)
Related papers
D. Bondoc, New data about Roman painted pottery discovered at Cioroiu Nou, Dolj County, Romania, in The Danubian Lands between the Black, Aegean and Adriatic Seas (7th Century BC – 10th Century AD), Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Black Sea Antiquities (Belgrade 17-21 september 2013), eds. : Gocha R. Tsetskhladze, Alexandru Avram and James Hargrave, Oxford 2015, p. 475-480.
Marisia, 2021
During a rescue excavation near Sâncrăieni (Hungarian Csíkszentkirály, Harghita County, Romania) a pottery deposit was discovered. The feature was made of a large tripartite storage vessel placed into a pit. Several other objects were put inside the vessel, but a few ceramic fragments were also found below the vessel, in a burnt layer with a lot of charcoal. The objects inside the vessel were made of several fragments of one plate, fragments of four clay weights and of grinding stones. Based on analogies the vessel and the vessel fragments can be attributed to the Late Bronze Age Gáva culture, to its classical (Gáva II) phase, which in terms of Central-European chronology is the Ha A2-B1 period. The paper discusses the occurrence of tripartite vessels of the Gáva period. Similar vessels appear in various contexts: in burials (Reci–Telek), in pottery depositions (Reci–Telek, Sâncrăieni–Kőoldal) or in settlements in fragmented state (Reci–Telek, Cernat–Hegyes). For a better understanding of Gáva pottery deposits with objects we had to rely on a somewhat wider chronological span, like the period of the Suciu de Sus culture, the pre- respectively the proto-Gáva period. Selective depositions are mostly known from the beginning of the Late Bronze Age. The storage vessels sometimes occur alone, or associated with different objects. Many times the number of these objects differ to one place to another, but a main pattern of selection can be traced. The ritual activity, which led to the hiding of the vessels and other clay objects is hard to reconstruct. In everyday life these recipients could have been used for storage, fermentation or other purposes, but later received a role in ritual activities: as accessories for food or drink sacrifice and were not used anymore in everyday life.
The archaeologist Eugen Comsa researched the Chalcolithic settlement of Radovanu-La Muscalu (4800-4600 cal. BC) in southern Romania for over 30 years (1960-1990), producing impressive results. The main settlement is marked by a short occupation of the Vidra phase and four evolving stages of the Spanțov phase of the Boian culture (5200-4550 cal. BC). The excavation of this settlement yielded rich archaeological material comprising pottery, figurines, miniaturist models of dwelling units, flint, bone and antler tools, and jewelery, mostly still unpublished and currently under study. Within the framework of this re-examination of the material from this important site, a particular focus has been to address the study of aspects concerning pottery making traditions at Radovanu. This chapter presents the preliminary results of this technological study, carried out through a combination of macroscopic and archaeometric analyses, which enable the underlining of some aspects of pottery manufacturing, such as clay preparation, decoration, and firing processes.
Starčevo-Criș pottery from TELEOR 003, S Romania
BMJT 4 (2012), 5-46
This paper provides a summary of my work on a pottery sample from the S Romanian site TELEOR 003 (Măgura ‘Buduiasca’, Teleorman county), focusing on technological and morphological aspects. The material dates to the Starčevo-Criş period, about 58th century cal BC. The analysis suggests we are dealing with a coherent and sophisticated ceramic assemblage in technological and categorical terms, implying a solid manufacturing tradition able to produce vessels differing in outlook and function, but unified in fabric, surface treatments, vessel build-up, and form concept.
Some Thoughts on the Appearance of Pottery in the Lower Danube Plain (Romania)
Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies 23 (2007), 109-19
We aim to prouide a background for the recent inuoluement of the Department of Pottery Technologt (Leiden Facuhy of ArchaeologD and of TACBT in the Southern Romanian Archaeohgical Project (SRAP) carried, out U Cardif Uniuersity and directed by Douglass Bailey. Preliminary rEnrts of our worh haue appeared in preuious issues of this journal. We are also participating in the associated project by Radian Andreescu and Pauel MireA concerning the neolithisation of the Lower Danube region. Among the set of issues addrased by our ceramic reseArclt, the appenrAnce of pottery in Neolithic pastoral societies in the Lower Danube ualley is a hrl one. We haue first-hand acquaintance with two early sites here, both subsumed und,er the generic nAme of Mdgura, neAr the modern town ofAlexandria in South Romania, where tbe earlier nne, at about 6000 cal BC, is in fott independent from the lorgtr main site first settled some time later during the Starteuo-CriS period.2 Ceramic programme of SRAP The Southern Romanian Archaeological project (SRAP) pto'oided the impulse to treat settlement patterns, land-use, and material culture within a micro-regional context (Bailey et al. 2002). In terms of pottery, SRAP is concerned with a set of research issues that are being addressed to sites and materials within this region dating from the first uses of ceramics during the early Neolithic (.". 6000-5600 cal BC) to the subsequent Dudegti and Vidastra phases (ca. 5500-5000 cal BC), r'rp until the 5'h millennium Boian and Gumelnita periods. Major research issues the SRAP ceramic programme is deali.g with focus on: o Technology: resource acquisition (clays, tempering materials, pigments and fillers); fabric analysis (makirg use of microscopic observations, and, eventually, of thin-sections); formirg techniques, chafnes opiratoires, surface-finishitg and decoration techniques; firing procedures; motor habit patterns; o Morpholory and categorisation: establishing suitable, quantified rypological schemes to come towards an emic categorisation of assemblages making use of the technological analyses, the gestures involved in handling pottery, the use-functions (cooking, serving, storage, ritual uses); Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies 23, 2007 : I 09-120.
Preliminary notes concerning Middle Bronze Ages pottery analysis from Costişa-Cetățuia, Neamț County
2013
The Costișa archaeological culture has been known for more than half a century and it has been categorized as belonging to the Middle Bronze Age in the Eastern Carpathian area. From the very beginning it was supposed to be the result of local connections with southern Monteoru-type elements and northern ones such as Komariw- Bialy-Potik. This assessment was made on the basis of a comparative analysis of the known archaeological investigation methods (stratigraphy and pottery typology). The present contribution employs another type of analysis of the pottery from the eponymous site. Thus, starting from the archaeological database consisting of seven pottery shards, the following scientific investigations were performed: SEM-EDS analysis, optical spectroscopy, and chemical modules analysis. The aim was to cover all the steps followed during modern pottery investigation, from the archaeological description of the artefacts and the initial macroscopic evaluation, to the integration by t...
Dorel Bondoc, Roman painted pottery discovered at Cioroiul Nou, Dolj County, Romania, in: In Honorem Gheorghe Popilian (edited by Dorel Bondoc), Craiova 2006, p. 128-141.