Family Suicide Bombing: A Psychological Analysis of Contemporary Terrorism (original) (raw)
Related papers
Suicide terrorism and psychology of suicide bomber
Libyan International Medical University Journal, 2021
This article reviews suicide terrorism and existing understandings of the psychology of suicide bomber. Suicide attacks that take place in many different parts of the world are one of the most used methods by the terrorist organizations. Suicide terrorism as a type of terrorism carried out by suicide bombers wearing bomb vests or by assembled bomb vehicles attracts a lot of attention globally. Throughout human history, some people may attempt suicide at some point in their lives, and some of these attempts end in death. Suicide is an act of self-punishment and deliberate separation from the world. In other words, suicide is a pathological behavior that a person consciously does with the aim of ending his life and ends with success. The act of killing one's own life, which a person cannot make sense of and regards as abnormal, is such a complex and painful event. In this study, terror, suicide terrorism, suicide bombing will be studied, and the psychology of the suicide bomber wi...
2020
This paper analyses the process of indoctrination and brainwashing in the case of terrorism. This study uses a psychological approach to uncover the suicide bombing case in Surabaya which has happened in Mei 2018. By using a case study, this research effort to understand deeply the psychological phenomenon that encourages terrorists to invite their families like suicide bombers. This research shows that the indoctrination process is done by giving video on jihad. This indoctrination process is an important stage in the cultivation of radical ideologies through preradicalization, self-identification, and jihadization. In this study, it was found that there are some stages of brainwashing for suicide bombers, namely the recruitment process, the indoctrination stage, and the isolation to do an attack of suicide bombing. Key Word: Brainwashing, Indoctrination, Suicide Bombing, Terrorism 2 AKADEMIKA, Vol. 25, No. 01 Januari–Juni 2020 A. Introduction The acts of terrorism in several regio...
The Phenomenon of Suicide Bombing
Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 2006
This article reviews the literature on the phenomenon of suicide bombing. It addresses the question of just how much a psychological understanding of the individuals involved can aid in prevention. The article looks at historical, epidemiological, and cultural perspectives and compares the nonpsychological and psychological approaches to suicide bombing. On the basis of the material available it seems that social processes such as group-dynamic indoctrination and political factors are decisive in analyzing this problem. Cultural, nationalistic, and religious factors are important. The conclusion is that in suicidal bombing, suicide is instrumental in the context of war, not in the context of psychopathology. Suicide bombing is instrumental in realizing fatalities, and it is only one of many weapons. The act of killing in warfare is more important to understanding suicidal terrorism than the act of suicide. This explains why psychological profiling of suicidal terrorists has to date not been successful.
The phenomenon of suicide bombing: A review of psychological and nonpsychological factors
… of Crisis Intervention and Suicide …, 2006
This article reviews the literature on the phenomenon of suicide bombing. It addresses the question of just how much a psychological understanding of the individuals involved can aid in prevention. The article looks at historical, epidemiological, and cultural perspectives and compares the nonpsychological and psychological approaches to suicide bombing. On the basis of the material available it seems that social processes such as group-dynamic indoctrination and political factors are decisive in analyzing this problem. Cultural, nationalistic, and religious factors are important. The conclusion is that in suicidal bombing, suicide is instrumental in the context of war, not in the context of psychopathology. Suicide bombing is instrumental in realizing fatalities, and it is only one of many weapons. The act of killing in warfare is more important to understanding suicidal terrorism than the act of suicide. This explains why psychological profiling of suicidal terrorists has to date not been successful.
Supervisor : Prof. Heddy Shri-Ahimsa Putra, M.A., M.Phil, Ph.D Co-Supervisor : Dr. Setiadi, M.Si ABSTRACT Terorism obviously has became part of threat in having nationality. The suicide bombing attack incident in Bali Island at 2004 was a beginning of people and Indonesian government concern toward terorism issues. A lot of studies were conducted toward this issue. Terorism study was using analytical framework, namely rational and cultural. The cultural framework viewed behaviour, attitude, and action as manifesting of value, system, faith, and ideology. The research was carried out in Kotamadya Cirebon, West Java Province, the location where criminal action of suicide terorism happened in Majid Adz Dzikra of Kota Cirebon Police Station. This research was an anthropologic research that attempt to describe and to understand process in kinship system when a family/relative found the fact that criminal action agent of suicide terorism in a mosque by the time people were doing Jumat prayers was their family member. Etnographic approach was through phenomenologic hermeunetic prespective and alethic hermeneutic as the main selection. The research result showed that suicide terorism criminal action in Adz Dzikra Mosque Mapolresta Cirebon was respond in anger and ashamed by people of Cirebon. The way they respond this terorism incident was refused the body of the terorism agent to be burried in Cirebon. This people attitude was based on the understanding that the mosque bombing incident was very much contrary to the people of Cirebon life values. One of those values was the ideology that inheritance by Syech Syarif Hidayatullah, that stated “Ingsun Titip Tajuq lan Fakir Miskin”. For the relative of the incident agent, it caused dilemma in take a stance. Ideologically, they were resist, furious, and ashamed in taking a stance of the incident, nevertheless the obligation to hold and carried out kinship values, namely to assist among the relative members has forced them to act differently with the people. This research result was expected to be able to complete terorism studies in cultural analitic study and able to provide prespective to security apparatus that assistance toward terorist who were members of the relative did not mean they support the ideology and terorism action, yet it was performed due to kindship values presence that must be hold and carried out in a high esteem. Keywords: terrorism ,suicide attack,people, kinship
A Sociological Perspective To Suicide Bombing
2011
Orta Dogu’da Islam ile digerkâm intihar eylemleri arasindaki iliskileri anlamaya yonelik olan bu makalede ilk olarak Durkheim’in intihar eylemleri hakkindaki gorusleri ele alinacak. Ikinci olarak Islam’in intihar girisimleri hakkindaki ortodoks yorumlari incelenecek. Ucuncu olarak, ayni dinin bazi yerlerde intihar eylemlerini engellerken neden bazi bolgelerde bu eylerimi tesvik ettigini anlamak icin Geertz’in din hakkindaki dusuncelerine bakilacak. Dorduncu olarak, Orta Dogu’nun toplumsal ve siyasi ortaminin intihar eylemlerindeki katkisi tartisilacak. Son olarak Islam mi yok Orta Dogunun politik ve ictimai ortaminin bu eylemleri tesvik edip etmedigi munazarasi yapilacak.
Suicide Terrorism: Exploring Motivations.
hy do certain individuals sit, plan, organise, and despatch other individuals to kill themselves in the hope of killing others "in such a horrific way at the bus stop or in a crowded market," i in air planes as well as cafes, mosques and churches when regular commando action, shooting sprees and regular bombs should suffice? This study focuses on the deployment of suicide attacks by certain organisation, and attempts to answer the question 'why?'' Extant studies tend to focus on the grievances of terrorist organisations and the suicide bombers. The deliberate appropriation of the suicide attack tactic by the leadership of these organisations in spite of 'grievance' is often ignored.