Vizitele de lucru, un ritual al "Epocii de aur" (original) (raw)
Related papers
My paper analyzes how a part of the Romanian people contested on daily basis their leader, Nicolae Ceausescu, and also the overwhelming presence of his cult of personality in their life especially during the 1980s. To this end, I will employ James C. Scott’s concept of everyday resistance in order to map the array of means used by the people in order to express their protest towards the public homage paid to the Romanian communist leader.
Ceaușescu’s National-Communist Populist Turn of the 1970s: A Failed Charisma?
Connexe : les espaces postcommunistes en question(s)
Ceaușescu’s name is linked to his Promethean attempt to secure Romania’s independence from the Soviet tutelary power and to build a modern industrial state out of the agricultural and industrial Romania modernised during the 1950s following the Stalinist model. This international and social challenge was implemented through the mobilisation of nationalist ideology and the strengthening of the relation between the leader and his people. To attract the masses, Ceaușescu’s charisma did not refer to any objective and inner quality of the leader but to his capacity to embody and manipulate the aspirations of large part of society thanks to a vast housing and industrialization program and a call to nationalism. Even if this populist policy eventually failed in 1989, it consolidated the regime for almost 30 years.
The Proceedings of the International Conference Literature, Discourse and Multicultural Dialogue.Literature as Mediator. Intersecting Discourses and Dialogues in a Multicultural World, Tîrgu-Mureș, Mureș, 2018, eISBN: 978-606-8624-14-3, 2018
The present study aims to bring into attention the ways in which an important historical event, such as "the making of Great Romania" was celebrated during the "80 in Ceausescu"s Romania. It is known the fact that communist propaganda used each and every festive moment to support the communist ideology, and least but not last, to strengthen the leader"s personality cult. In this regard, we are going to take a look over some of the most important publications from those times: Scînteia, România Liberă, România Literară, Flacăra, Era Socialistă, Cutezătorii, Luminița, and Șoimii patriei.
Codrul Cosminului
The works of Simion Florea Marian belong to the stage of a full assertion of the Romanian spirituality which found expression in Bukovina in the second half of the nineteenth century. His historical legends, traditions, and mythology written and published over the years have had a great impact on the Romanian culture, influencing the way in which people could value their spiritual heritage. His legacy is most complex, featuring various aspects; hence the historiography dedicated to the scholar Simion Florea Marian should be solid and extensive. In this study, we have aimed to highlight the historical legends of the 13 th and 14 th centuries and, if possible, to compare them with the Moldavian chronicles, the processes, and events from an important period of the Middle Ages, from the great Mongolian invasions until the completion of the second Romanian mediaeval state. The geographic locations, which are quite precise in the texts Simion Florea Marian put into circulation, have been of great help in our attempt; this is important considering that fragments of his legends intertwine with actual historical events.
Communism in Post-communist Romania: An Ambivalent Legacy
Balkanistic Forum, vol. 2, ‘Ambivalent Legacies’, pp. 120-142, 2024
After Nicolae Ceaușescu's execution on December 25, 1989, Romania faced an important issue to deal with: What was to be done with the 44 years of a quasitotalitarian system, based on continuous political violence?! How should Romanians relate to it? What was to be remembered and what was to be forgotten? How it should be passed on to the next generations, those who were born before, around or after the fall of the regime? The answer to these questions has varied over the 35 years since the fall of the communist regime in Romania. Numerous factors contributed to the way in which Romanians related to their communist past, how it was represented in the public space, how it was and is passed on. The actors involved have also changed and the official public memory has known many avatars. In the subsequent pages, I propose an analysis of all these aspects, resulting from my research of the last 21 years on the memory of Communism.
National Ideology in the Socialist Republic of Romania.docx
The aim of this essay is to show the radical national ideology that was present in Romania, in a time when the Romanian Communist Party (“Partidul Comunist Romanesc”) possessed all the legal, judicial and administrative power in the state. The support text, on which I will base my essay, is the speech that President Nicolae Ceaușescu gave on August 21, 1968 in Bucharest in the Square of the Republican Palace. With this speech Ceaușescu gained the love of his people, their adoration – afterwards a cult of personality emerged worshiping the President, Nicolae Ceaușescu.
The hierarchical ranking of history, memory and nostalgia classifies the ubiquitous enactments of Nicolae Ceauşescu from the vernacular memory of post-communist Romania as " unhealthy nostalgia " for the communist past. This paper explores various instances of Ceauşescu's memorialization as reflected in contemporary art and living memorials inked on the skin (nostalgia tattoos). These vernacular memorials and commemorations of the former communist leader occasion a peculiar culture of remembrance where " nostalgia " for Ceauşescu exceeds its boundaries of meaning and becomes a term which can be mobilized against present wrongdoings and capitalist injustices. From an epistemological narrative standpoint, this paper attempts to argue that to construct a harmonious but counterfeit picture of the past (in which Nicolae Ceauşescu and his era are exclusively demonized) is not desirable or acceptable because the individuals (and the communities) who remember that past are not homogeneous and their memories and longings for the past are not similar. Thus, nostalgia ought not to be understood exclusively as an abnormal (unauthentic, unhealthy) memory of the past but rather as a peculiar form of memory illuminating a healthy critique of the present in the light of the past.