“Judging the Judge: Judicial Competence in 19th Century Iran”, Bulletin d'études orientales, vol. 63, 2014, pp. 277-294. (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Qajar jurist and his ruling: A study of judicial practice in nineteenth century Iran
2013
3.4. Shaftī's judicial decision and its enforcement 3.4.1. Intrigues of the opposition 3.5. Discussion: The jurist as muftī 3.6. Text and translation of selected documents Chapter 4 The ruling as a judicial decision in sharīʿa litigation 4.1. The resolution of a land dispute in Astarābād 4.1.1. Summary of the case 4.2. Dramatis personae 4.2.1. The claimants: The Dirāzgīsū sayyids 4.2.2. The ʿulamāʾ of Isfahan 4.2.3. The ʿulamāʾ of Astarābād 4.2.4. The defendants: ʿAbbās Khān Qājār Bēglerbēgī and his descendants 4.3. The archive of the Dirāzgīsū sayyids 4.4. The rulings of the ʿulamāʾ of Isfahan in Astarābād 4.4.1. Historical background 4.4.2. Why Isfahan? 4.4.3. The issuance of Āqā Muḥammad Mahdī's ruling 4. 4.4. Āqā Muḥammad Mahdī's ruling in Astarābād 4. 4.5. Sayyid Muḥammad Bāqir Shaftī's ratification (imḍāʾ-i ḥukm) 4. 4.6. Shaftī's ratification in Astarābād 4. 4.7. Ḥājjī Muḥammad Ibrāhīm Kalbāsī's ratification 4. 4.8. The issuance of Kalbāsī's ratification 4. 4.9. Certifying the issuance of Kalbāsī's ratification 4.4 .10. Kalbāsī's ratification in Astarābād 4.5. Ḥāj jī Mullā Riḍā Astarābādī's ruling revived 4. 5.1. Why revive an old ruling? 4. 5.2. From a share in revenues to a return of the lands 4. 5.3. Certifying the issuance of Ḥājjī Mullā Riḍā Astarābādī's ruling 4. 5.4. The issuance of the ruling on a witness statement 4. 5.5. Mīr Mūsā and Mīr Taqī's witness statement 4. 5.6. Bīja Sharaf's acknowledgement 4.6. Attempts at enforcing arbitration 4. 6.1. The attempt at arbitration before imām-jumʿa Sharīʿatmadār 4. 6.2. The first binding agreement at the royal court 4. 6.3. ʿAbbās Khān's new petition to the royal court 4. 6.4. The attempt at arbitration before Mullā Muḥammad Taqī 4. 6.5. The second binding agreement at the royal court 4.7. Discussion: The jurist as qāḍī 4. 7.1. Failing to appear in court as a strategy 4. 7.2. Choosing the judge for arbitration 4. 7.3. The meaning of mujtahid-i nāfidh al-ḥukm 4. 7.4. Contesting the judge's competence 4. 7.5. Ratifications and invalidations 4.8. The legal debate over the rulings and the settlement 4. 8.1. The ruling of Raʾīs al-ʿUlamāʾ 4. 8.2. The binding force of the text 4. 8.3. The circumstances of issuance 4. 8.4. Documents of possession of the Qajar khans 4. 8.5. Territorial jurisdiction 4. 8.6. The ruling in the defendant's absence TMN = Muḥammad Ismāʿīl Riḍwānī ed. Iʿitimād al-Saltana, Muḥammad Ḥasan Khān. Tārīkh-i Muntaẓam-i Nāṣirī. Volumes 1-3. Tihrān: Dunyā-yi Kitāb, 1363-1367sh/1984-1988. TAS = Muḥammad Muḥsin Āqā Buzurg Tihrānī. Ṭabāqāt Aʿlām al-Shīʿa. Volumes 11 and 12. Bayrūt: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī li al-Ṭibāʿa wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ, 2009. TU = Muḥammad Riḍā Azharī and Ghulām Riḍā Paranda eds. Muḥammd b. Sulaymān Tunikābūnī. Tadhkira al-ʿUlamāʾ. Mashhad: Bunyād-i Pazhuhish-hā-yi Islāmī, 1372sh/1994. ZDMG = Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 40 "The transcript corresponds to the original which has thirteen seals altogether on the recto and verso and twelve sijills on the recto. Written by the miserable wretch on the night of 25 Rabīʿ al-Awwal 1285/16 July 1868" (al-sawād muṭābiqun li-aṣlihi l-mushtamal matnan wa zahran ʿalā thalthata ʿashara khātaman wa matnan ʿalā ithnay ʿashara sijillan ḥarrarahu al-aqall fī layla 25 shahr Rabīʿ al-Awwal 1265), see AM, p.11 and bottom left hand corner p. 148. 40 "This document was registered on 3 Ramaḍān 1284/29 December 1867. [Written on] 19 Shawwāl 1284/13 February 1868" (īn tamassuk dar tārīkh 3 shahr Ramaḍān al-mubārak sana 1284 thabt shuda ast, bi tārīkh 19 Shawwāl 1284), see AM, p. 11 and the top margin note on the left hand column, p.34. 41 "It corresponds to its registered entry and is valid. Written by the miserable wretch on 19 Shawwāl 1284/13 February 1868" (muwāfiq-i thabt wa muʿtabar ast; ḥarrarahu al-aqall fī 19 Shawwāl al-mukarram 1284), see left hand column last entry AM, p.52 42 "This document on 5 Dhū al-Hajj 1284/29 March 1868 was annulled and the seal of Sangalajī was removed from the original" (īn nivistha bi-tārīkh-i panjum-i shahr-i dhī hijja 1284 bāṭil shud wa muhr-i jināb āqā kishida shud), see AM, p.12 43 AM, p.12. 44 AM, p.12
Delivering Justice: The Monarch's ʿ Courts and the in Safavid Iran
2018
This article examines the relationship between the ʿurfī (monarchical/sultanic) and the sharīʿa courts in the administration of justice in Safavid Iran. In particular, it considers the notion that there was a split between a sacred and a secular basis for justice in Safavid Iran. To prove that this is not the case, the article looks at the roles of the Shah, the ṣadr, the qāzīs, the shaykh al-Islām, and the dīvān-begī in administering justice during the period. It shows that legal roles and processes in the Safavid justice system unfolded within a religious framework, reflecting the interface between ideal stipulations and practical ends, and between public sharīʿa-derived law and private monarchical law. This provides evidence that sharīʿa and ʿurfī courts were interdependent and provided overlays of jurisdiction in Safavid Iran.
Mirza Malkom Khan and his proposals for legal transformation in 19th-century Iran
Legal Orders Under Pressure: Non-Western Experiences of Legal Transformations in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries, 2022
7-9 December 2022 - Symposium of the research group "Translations & Transitions: Legal Practice in 19th Century Japan, China, and the Ottoman Empire", Max-Planck-Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory and University of Vienna.
The Life of the Law in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Iranian Studies, 2018
Beyond the esoteric deliberations of Islamic jurists and their exegesis of criminal and private law doctrines, Iranian law lives a life of its own. It is a life of routine practices of judges, court clerks, lawyers and clients, each of whom is striving to turn the law to their own advantage. It is also a life of contested legality, a relentless struggle over the right to determine the law in a juridical field which is infused with strife and hostility. These conflicts are reproduced daily as two competing conceptions of law, and their corresponding perceptions of legality clash in pursuit of justice. The Iranian judiciary’s concept of law, its reconstruction of Islamic jurisprudence and methods of dispensing justice, which on the surface are reminiscent of Max Weber’s “qādi-justice,” collide with the legal profession’s formal rational understanding thereof. However, Iranian judges are not Weberian qādis, and the legal profession is not a homogenous group of attorneys driven by a col...
Iran 1400 Project, 2020
Going back to 1919 and the first constitution of Mashrooteh period, this article delivers a comprehensive report on the institution of the Attorney General in Iran. The author sees the modernization of the Department of Justice (the Prosecutor’s Office) as part of the larger project of reforming the entire Judiciary branch. From the selection of judges and revamping of their required qualifications to their specific duties and responsibilities under the law are covered here. The public perception of these reforms along with a long list of specific corrective measures is discussed as well. A considerable portion of this article is devoted to the reforms after the Islamic Revolution in 1979. The changes in the judicial philosophy, the commitment to Islamic law (sharia), and the creation of new types of courts are some of the major changes, legitimized by the new constitution of the Islamic Republic, are all documented here. The history of the office of the Inspector General overseeing the Judiciary and the Attorney General’s office, dating back to 1928, is also a valuable part of this Article.