Dimensions of Successful Public Participation in Protected Area Planning (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ecology and Participation in Landscape-Based Planning Within the Pacific Northwest
Policy Studies Journal, 1999
Landscape-based planning, and in particular ecosystem management, has been promoted widely as an approach to linking ecological, social, and economic concerw at large spatial and temporal scales, yet there have been f g v comparative studies of a c t 4 projects. We used a mailed questionnaire and four cave studies within the Pacijic Northwest region of the United States to explore the ways in which ecological analyses are being integrated with l d c a p e planning projects and to identify linkages between science and public involvement.
Quantifying and easing conflicting goals between interest groups in natural resource planning
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2019
Management of natural resources at the regional level is a compromise between a variety of objectives and interests. At the local level, management of the forests depends upon the ownership structure, with forest owners using their forests as they see fit. A potential conflict occurs if the forest owners’ management decisions are counter to the interests of society in general or the industry that relies on the forest resource as their raw material. We explore the intensity of this conflict at the regional level in several large boreal forest production landscapes. To explore the conflict, we investigate three main interest groups: (i) economically oriented forest owners; (ii) industry groups (focusing on maintaining an even timber supply); and (iii) a group representing general public interests (focusing on enhancing ecosystem services and biodiversity protection). The severity of conflicts differs between interest groups; we found a minor conflict between the economically oriented ...
Public Participation as Public Debate: A Deliberative Turn in Natural Resource Management
Society & Natural Resources, 2005
This article examines some key similarities and differences between two leading perspectives on public participation: the natural resource management literature and deliberative democratic theory. We assert that contemporary deliberative democratic theory, as proposed by Habermas and others, provides important theoretical and applied insights that are often unexamined in the natural resource literature. Specifically, deliberative democratic theory maintains a focus on the value of public deliberation (dialogue and debate), attention to internal as well as external forms of exclusion, and constructive forms of distrust. The article demonstrates that a deliberative democratic perspective on public participation may serve to challenge some established traditions within the natural resource literature and lead to new ways of conducting and evaluating public participation.
Managing Public Forests: Understanding the Role of Collaborative Planning
Environmental Management, 1998
As federal land management agencies such as the USDA Forest Service increasingly choose to implement collaborative methods of public participation, research is needed to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the technique, to identify barriers to effective implementation of collaborative processes, and to provide recommendations for increasing its effectiveness. This paper reports on the findings of two studies focused on the experiences of Forest
Searching for effective natural-resources policy: The special challenges of ecosystem management
1995
No matter how elegant ecosystem management is scientifically, it will not reach its potential in western U.S., with its abundant public lands, unless it is effective public policy. Such policy is (1) an adaptive process, (2) utilizes the most appropriate science and technology, (3) is implementable, and (4) has low transaction cost. This paper focuses on the latter two characteristics which are shaped by social legitimacy, and proposes a procedure termed Collaborative Learning as a promising decision-making process for ecosystem management. Two defining criteria of social legitimacy in contemporary American public policy are (1) policy solutions must be recognized as technically sound; and (2) if people's lives are affected, they must have a voice in policy process. The increasing sophistication of science and technology makes them less understood by the general public, and creates a dilemma between the narrow politics of expertise and a broad politics of public inclusion. Land...
Coupling protected area governance and management through planning
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Growing and diversifying demands, changing social and political contexts, and accelerating calls for greater public involvement in decisions require a new view of protected area planning. While many papers in the conservation literature suggest local community engagement in planning, we argue that a broader conceptualization of planning is needed. This conceptualization—planning as a mid-scale social process to functionally couple governance with management—would include community engagement but responds to growing needs for processes that are multi-scale and continuous rather than episodic, facilitates information flow between governance and management, and provides for constructing and interpreting public interests in protected areas. We view planning as a ‘loose–tight system’ that facilitates functional linkages between governance and management. It is loose in the sense of offering venues for social discourse about the mental models underlying protected area decisions, but tight in the sense of enabling flows of information between governance and management. This coupling helps management agencies better understand on-going, larger-scale governance processes where the public interests in protected areas are debated and configured. It also facilitates the needed feedback from management to governance concerning the efficacy of various management actions.
Improving Public Participation in Resource Protection: Case Studies in North-Central Idaho
Public involvement in resource protection is necessary for many resource enti- ties and initiatives, yet public response is often confrontational, apathetic or non-existent. An alternative process that promotes greater ownership and involvement in planning was offered to participants within the existing state water protection planning guidelines leading to state plan certification. Four rural, traditionally independent north-central Idaho communities located within an Indian Reservation participated in a water protection planning study. Case studies suggest willingness and preference on the part of commu- nities to use government data, technical expertise and recommendations when given control of the planning process. This work provides new information on improving com- munity involvement within existing regulatory frameworks.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies
The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Forest Service) manages 154 national forests and 20 grasslands in 44 states and Puerto Rico. National Forest Land and Resource Management Plans (forest plans) form the basis for land and resource management of national forests in the United States. For more than a decade the Forest Service has been attempting to incorporate innovative, collaborative public involvement strategies into the process for revising forest plans. In 2012 and 2015 the Forest Service codified new regulations for developing, revising, and amending forest plans. Collaboration and public involvement are explicit goals of the new regulations. This paper briefly reviews the literature on collaborative planning on national forests and explores a successful collaborative planning process used by the Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests, located in Vermont and New York respectively, to develop their 2006 forest plans. This paper shows how the Gre...