SOUTH ASIAN ASSOCIATION FOR REGIONAL COOPERATION A CASE STUDY OF SAARC AS A FAILED REGIONAL GROUPING (original) (raw)
Related papers
Dynamics of Regional Integration in South Asia: Lessons from the European Union
Margalla Papers, 2023
Regional integration is aimed at promoting socioeconomic growth and development in a region through economic cooperation among the member states. The European Union (EU) was established to promote economic and political cooperation among member countries. EU's unprecedented success in regional integration offers lessons for other regions. Unlike the EU, SAARC has not been successful in achieving significant economic integration among member states. Despite its potential, SAARC has been plagued by political and economic differences among member states, especially between Pakistan and India. South Asian countries are unable to boost regional integration not only because of their political differences but also due to other sub-regional and trans-regional initiatives that run anti to the spirit of regional integration under the umbrella of SAARC. India's role towards regional integration in South Asia is considered significant being the leading nation in the region. This paper first identifies the economic and political factors that hinder regional integration in South Asia. Then, it focuses on the dynamics of successful regional integration in Europe intending to underline the lessons to be learned by the South Asian countries to boost their regional cooperation.
Regional Cooperation in South Asia: Exploring the Three Pillars of Regionalism and their Relevance
The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies, 2020
The lofty ideals penned by the heads of the South Asian states at the birth of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) reflect a vision for promoting mutual trust and understanding in South Asia. But the member states have fallen into the intricate web of power balancing games, fluctuating economic growth and volatile ethnic and religious conditions that has marred the potential gains from regionalism. In such a scenario, while SAARCs snail-like progress continues without any remarkable achievements, there has been a rise of new regional organizations that has not only renewed our attention towards economic liberalization and the benefits accrued from multilateral economic cooperation but has also put into question the fundamentals of regionalism. The paper situates regionalism in acts of cooperation that are not isolated and discrete from each other but rather form a pattern of interconnecting expectations about the future of the alliance and the assumptions on...
Lessons from the European Union’s Economic Integration for South Asian Regionalism
Journal of Developing Societies, 2019
South Asian regionalism—mainly represented by the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)—has always been vulnerable to the influence of the long-standing bilateral disputes, and South Asian intra-regional trade and economic cooperation is limited. This article examines economic integration in Europe, from the 1950s to Britain’s decision to exit from the European Union (EU) in 2016, in order to identify possible lessons for the SAARC. In particular, this article makes use of Gürler’s model of economic integration to propose a way forward for economic cooperation through the SAARC. While the full implementation of the EU’s model of economic integration appears to be a distant reality for the SAARC, this article argues that a revitalized SAARC is nonetheless a suitable vehicle for pursuing a gradual process of economic cooperation in South Asia that may ultimately lead not only to economic integration but also the resolution of political disputes.
The Politics of Regional Cooperation in South Asia
South Asia in Transition
The Politics of Regional Cooperation in South Asia 231 region. The end of the Cold War did not make much of an impact in promoting regional cooperation in South Asia. Indeed, the region's own version of Cold War still continues and the traditional mistrust syndrome, which has bedevilled interstate relations in the region, persists. Against the above background, this chapter assesses why, despite huge potential, SAARC has failed to build a strong foundation and promote regional cooperation. It analyses the constraints and challenges of regional cooperation in South Asia. Finally, it advances some recommendations for making SAARC an effective regional organization.
POLITICAL ECONOMY OF REGIONAL CO-OPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA
ICONArts International Conference, 2015
South Asian Association for Regional Co-operation (SAARC) is considered as one of the major diplomatic breakthrough in South Asian region in its modern history. Theoretically, SAARC has high potential for cooperation because of the common features and challenges faced by its member states. Despite all these common features the conventional wisdom in this regard is that SAARC is “the most divided region” in the world. This study explores the degree of integration that the SAARC has already achieved during past 30 years. Using statistical data, descriptive evidences and literature review it is observed that most of the objectives of SAARC are still far beyond the reality. There are evidences that foreign policy of powerful SAARC members go against SAARC objectives. Using game theoretic framework, this paper attempts to interpret this as the Nash equilibrium of many interactions. Cooperation is the Pareto optimal strategy for all countries. However, various factors have influenced individual countries to choose noncooperative strategies instead. In this context it is identified that India’s role is very crucial. India as the largest country in SAARC and it as an emerging superpower has determined the achievements of the SAARC objectives. All the member states should re-visit the objectives of SAARC and at least as short term objective should confine to less controversial objectives such as poverty reduction and trade. Chinese, US and Euro interests in the region should be addressed strategically. Key Words: Political Economy, SAARC, Regional Integration and Regional Cooperation
SAARC: Social, Economic and Regional Integration of South Asia
The SAARC has been in existence for 25 years. However, it has yet to make a mark as a viable regional organisation and achieve its true potential. Insecurity on the part of smaller nations regarding India; mistrust among the member nations; unpleasant Indo-Pakistan relations; the self-centred attitude of member states; and feeble Western support are the major barriers to the SAARC’s progress. The need for India and other member states to work for a relevant role for the SAARC in the development of South Asia is beyond debate. India, given its size and influence, must play a more meaningful role in injecting life into the SAARC. Resolving contentious issues amongst member states will help remove mistrust and create an environment conducive to growth. All member states must shun a bilateral approach in favour of a regional outlook to maximise gains. The SAARC projecting itself as a united and an effective organisation will cause the world to take notice and help it grow like other regional organisations.
International Journal of Social Sciences, 2016
The European integration is three decades older than the South Asian integration. European Union stands as an outstanding regional body even though South Asian Association for regional Cooperation is still struggling to achieve the basic premises of economic integration. The aim of this paper is to comparatively analyze the two regional integrations and to identify how far is it appropriate to adopt the European integration model to accelerate the South Asian integration. One specific objective is to identify the core differences between the two regional settings and next objective is to determine the theoretical relevance of certain existing theories in describing the two integration processes. Another specific objective is to evaluate the suitability of adopting European Union model in South Asia and to recommend necessary reforms for better integration in South Asia. Data triangulation method has been used to accumulate secondary data from multiple sources available in electronic and printed form including books, journals, web, reports, historical records and treaties. Qualitative content analysis has been used since this is a documentary analysis and Content analysis evaluate document texts and to test theoretical relevance to understand data more comprehensively and scientifically. It will test prevailing theories in different contexts when compare the categories of different settings. Key findings depicts that there is a sharp diversity between the European Union and South Asia in terms of trade, economic development, human development, industrialization, urbanization, trade liberalization, income levels, poverty alleviation and political integration. Amidst these differences the applicability of adopting the European model proves to be a failure due to many factors. The democratic nature of the countries and their practice of free market economic policies along with the successful resolutions for political tensions in Europe significantly caused the long term success of European integration whereas South Asian countries are suffering from huge diversities in economic, geographic, cultural, trade and military terms within the region and hesitate to cooperate with one another due to these differences. Indo-Pakistan political tensions blended with smaller states' fear psychosis of Indian hegemony is the greatest constraint for better integration in South Asia. South Asia required rearranging the structure of its regional organization and opening avenues to discuss contentious issues among member states. Establishment of real democracies and reliable interactions among people to people contacts while adopting more comprehensive free market economic policies domestically would facilitate the economic and political integration of South Asia in the future.
Regional Integration in South Asia: Utopia or Reality?
Margalla Papers, 2022
South Asia comprises almost one-quarter of the world's population. It faces a host of disputes of varying natures, including armed conflicts, proxy wars, and religious and ethnic strife. Despite its deplorable state of human security and impoverished people, South Asia is considered the least integrated region globally. Approximately 1.99 billion people suffer in terms of energy, food, water and health security due to conflicts and hostile interstate relationships. This paper analyses the socio-political and security environment of the region and explores the impediments to regional integration. Focusing on the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, it highlights that the idea of regional integration cannot be realized without resolving core issues. Economic cooperation between regional countries can only be achieved if integration models like the European Union and Association of South East Asian Nations are considered with necessary deviations.
South Asian Regional Integration – Challenges and Prospects
South Asian regional integration is seemingly confronting many challenges. The aim of this paper is to identify those challenges and also look for prospects. Although regional integration in South Asia has adopted a kind of institutionalization, it is yet to deliver any concrete outcomes. High-politics and the not-so-conducive regional economic structures hinder any effectual culmination. However, constructivism, as a theory, is given due credence in this paper when looking for future prospects. The paper highlights the issues, and attempts to offer certain policy directions by analyzing the challenges and identifying the prospects in the ongoing integration/cooperation process.