Asexual Erotics: Intimate Readings of Compulsory Sexuality (original) (raw)

Related papers

The Asexual Perspective: Intimacy Without the Intimate

Crossings: An Undergraduate Arts Journal

Human relations and experiences are limited when dominant social orders are enforced through state intervention, heteronormative practices and assumptions, and ideologies that rest on the understanding that there is a right way to have sex. In this paper, queer theory frameworks and discourse are reworked to include readings of asexuality and asexual perspectives that challenge heteronormativity and state institutions of relations. The idea that without sex, relationships cannot be intimate is challenged. Heteronormative ideologies around sex are considered, including what would happen if sex and physical intimacy were less prominent in creating relations This is achieved by incorporating an asexual perspective as a key concept in queer theory. This is concluded through interactions with queer literature surrounding dominant ideologies and critiques of singledom, sexual reproductivity, and kin-making. The introduction of an asexual perspective to queer theory frameworks can expand c...

Asexuality and Compulsory Sexuality

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Sexuality Education, 2022

In her groundbreaking and educational popular nonfiction book ACE: What Asexuality Reveals About Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex, Angela Chen (2020) reflects on the importance of creating asexual representations and stories for asexual (ace) people by ace people. While on the one hand, she acknowledges the importance of educating allosexual (or non-asexual) people on asexuality, on the other, she anticipates the day when that will no longer be necessary, and when as aces “we will move closer to not feeling that any explanation is necessary” and “when aces reject the gaze that evaluates our identities so narrowly” (p. 84). The goal of this piece is to help bridge the gap between those two positions by moving closer toward that “feeling” of not needing “any explanation” for asexuality that Chen refers to. First, I examine in this entry definitions central to the lexicology of ace identities, paying particular attention to both ace and aromantic (aro) identities as well as to the significance of rethinking attraction. Next, I explore who asexuals are, drawing on prevalence rates and community composition. Finally, I explore the significance of compulsory sexuality and amatonormativity as conceptual frameworks. Knowledge of asexuality and aromanticism as well as compulsory sexuality, amatonormativity, and the dynamic possibilities of attraction are vital to sexuality education, which often neglects to include ace and aro related content both in schol- arship and pedagogical practice.

Is Sex Dead? Towards a Radical Understanding of Asexuality

2021

Asexuality has been largely absent from sexual studies and theory up until now. Building upon queer negativity and psychoanalytic frameworks, this article aims to trace asexuality back to the earliest studies on sex, acknowledging sexuality's linearity and dependence on social and cultural factors. Exploring current debates around 'peak libido' and 'the decline in sexuality', I argue that asexuality can be understood as the next step in sexuality's unfolding. Such an understanding of asexuality not only enables us to rethink how we perceive relationships and intimacy today, but also to rewrite the definition of the word 'queer'.

Can We Eroticise Equality? On the Politics of Sexual Desire

Sex is not a natural act. It feels radical to assert this claim in a cultural climate where biological determinism is again gaining ascendancy. The notion that there is an innate sexual drive – something deeply physiological and immutable about our human desire for sex – is thoroughly embedded in dominant discourses in the West. But sex doesn't exist outside the social context in which we're doing it. We must fight the return to determinism and ask if it is possible to practice our sexuality ethically.

Towards a Historical Materialist Concept of Asexuality and Compulsory Sexuality

This major research paper seeks to expand upon the work of Marxist-feminist scholars Rosemary Hennessy and Nancy Fraser by placing it into conversation with the emerging work of scholars of asexuality and asexual identity. In resisting the tendency to reify the identity category of “asexual” as a newly emerging and dialogically structured identity which stands in opposition to the “allosexual”, this paper with rather attempt to determine its nature as a historically structured and contingent emergence of a particular moment in neoliberal capitalism. From this, it will argue that there need not be a tension between the notions of “compulsory sexuality” and “sexusociety” developed by scholars such as Elizabeth Emens and Ela Przybylo and social reproduction analysis. Rather, asexuality can be used as a positional tool in order to illuminate the totality of sexuality as a reified and commodified entity under late capitalism, one which is useful for understanding and resisting the capitalist historical (re)organization of what Hennessy terms, “the human potential for sensation and affect”.

UNDOING THE BODY: ASEXUALITY AS A SUBVERSIVE MEANS TO RETHINK SEXUALITY

UNDOING THE BODY: ASEXUALITY AS A SUBVERSIVE MEANS TO RETHINK SEXUALITY, 2012

This study examines asexuality with its linguistic, philosophical, and social aspects. If one takes into consideration that sexual freedom movements have come a long way until now, one could easily notice that the acknowledgement and the social, academic consideration of asexuality is recent and has therefore occurred quite late in time. This study focuses on this delayed acceptance, and aims to provide a discussion about the construction of the sexual body through the asexual body. In my view, asexuality, with regard to Aristotle’s concept of negative potentiality, could set up a new viewpoint on the freedom of not-doing. In this regard, asexuality offers to linguistic, philosophy and social movements a chance to rethink negativity.

The Ethical Significance of Being an Erotic Object

The Palgrave Handbook of Sexual Ethics, 2022

Discussions of sexual ethics often focus on the wrong of treating another as a mere object instead of as a person worthy of respect. On this view, the task of sexual ethics becomes putting the other’s subjectivity above their status as erotic object so as to avoid the harms of objectification. Ward and Anderson argue that such a view disregards the crucial, moral role that erotic objecthood plays in sexual encounters. Important moral features of intimacy are disclosed through the experience of being an erotic object for another, as well as in perceiving another as an erotic object. Drawing on phenomenology, especially the insights of Simone de Beauvoir, Ward and Anderson argue that erotic encounters are shaped by the human condition of ambiguity, where being an object for others is intertwined with bodily agency. Because sexual agency is complex in this way, theories of sexual ethics and responsibility must widen their focus beyond transparent communication and authoritative expressions of will.