Shaping the Future of Mekong Regional Architecture: Reinforcing Transboundary Water Governance Through Reciprocity (original) (raw)
Related papers
A framework for analysing transboundary water governance complexes, illustrated in the Mekong Region
Journal of Hydrology, 2012
In this paper we present a framework for analysing transboundary water governance complexes, illustrated in the Mekong Region. In this region, the sharing of waters between countries adds a critical dimension to decision making about producing food and energy, maintaining vital ecosystems, and sustaining livelihoods. Hydropower, dams, diversions, expanding cities and irrigation schemes are all in the mix. The key elements of the framework are: context, drivers, arenas, tools, decisions and impacts. The use of deliberation, technical and advocacy tools is explored and normative governance improvements are suggested.
Evolution of an International Water Resources Management Regime in the Mekong River Basin, The
Nat. Resources J., 2000
The Mekong Basin water management regime has existed since 1957, with three distinct periods. The Mekong Committee (1957-1975) pursued integrated basin development, which was not achieved due to geopolitical changes after the Vietnam War. During the Interim Mekong Committee era (1978-1992), the Mekong countries pursued independent water resources development, creating conflicts over water allocation. The Mekong River Commission (1995-present) aims to help member states share water in the post-Cold War era. The institutional framework of the Mekong River Commission reflects the historical legacy of the Mekong regime and must be understood in this context. Regional geopolitics, international development assistance, and water management norms are used to explain the evolution of the Mekong regime over four decades.
The Hydropolitics of Integrated Water Resource Management in the Mekong River Basin
Considered a success story in transboundary water cooperation, the Mekong River Basin is a site of evolving and heterogeneous power relationships. The term “Integrated Water Resources Management” (IWRM) is often used in conjunction with themes of “sustainable development” to push a participatory approach river basin management. Inclusive and universal in theory, the practical applications of this approach require value judgments and trade-offs that are influenced by the asymmetrical developmental demands of riparian states. Differing colonial and developmental histories, methods of valuation, and institutional capacities are often overlooked in order to strengthening international cooperation. Lacking the legal capacity to enforce many of these cooperative “guidelines” (1), “integration” in the Mekong Basin often takes the shape of “soft cooperation.”1
Mekong at the Crossroads: Alternative Paths of Water Development and Impact Assessment
J. Öjendal et al. (eds.), Politics and Development in a Transboundary Watershed
The Mekong Region in Southeast Asia is undergoing rapid transitions socially, economically, and environmentally. Water is related to these changes in a very profound manner, and the Mekong River and its tributaries are seeing increasing number of plans for water development, most notably in the form of large-scale hydropower. The impacts of this development vary among regional, national, and local levels and across different timescales, influencing societies, politics, and the environment in a variety of ways. While different impact assessment and water management frameworks -including Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) -have been used by actors at different levels in the basin, they have not been too successful in analyzing and communicating the various development paths and their differing impacts in all their complexity. This chapter discusses the water development pathways in the Mekong Basin, including their potential impacts and the different possibilities to assess them, as of early 2010. It is concluded that the water development and related management practices in the Mekong are at the crossroads methodologically and, even more importantly, politically.
Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, 2019
The Mekong River Commission (MRC) was created following the decline of the Mekong Committee (1957-1978) and the Interim Mekong Committee (1978-1995) as intergovernmental river basin organizations for regional dialogue and cooperation in the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB). It was established in 1995 when the four riparian nations of the LMB: Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam signed the Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin (aka 1995 Mekong Agreement). This framework agreement established procedures for transboundary water resources management and regional diplomacy (Radosevich & Olson, 1999), committing each member state to cooperate in a constructive and mutually beneficial manner to promote the equitable use of the basin's resources, and the economic and social well-being of all citizens in the Mekong region (MRC, 1995). It urges consultation among all members before implementing a mainstream project with transboundary implications, but does not require consensus.