Doors, Departments, and the Public Humanities (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reframing the Public Humanities: The Tensions, Challenges & Potentials of a More Expansive Endeavor
Daedalus
This essay assesses the so-called crisis in the humanities from the vantage point of the state humanities councils, looking at the richness and increasing diversity of public humanities work happening outside the academy. The essay posits that the humanities are flourishing in a variety of public spaces, where voices outside the academy are more effectively questioning what it means to commemorate the past and build in community and meaning through that process. But even with such work thriving, the humanities face challenges. Some of those challenges are related to definitional and communications issues in and between both the academic and public sectors. Other challenges are related to access and allocation of resources. While this essay does not pretend to have “answers “ to these perennial issues, it suggests that both the academy and the public might benefit from and create more lasting and relevant impact from bridge-building that marries the expertise and knowledge from both ...
Public Humanities and Publication: A Working Paper
2021
This paper explores the challenges associated with the publication of public and publicly engaged humanities scholarship. It is the product of a working group convened in February 2020 by Routledge, Taylor & Francis and the National Humanities Alliance to identify and discuss model practices for publishing on public and publicly engaged humanities work in higher education. Its central thesis is this: the spread of publicly engaged work via academic publication holds the potential to benefit all, across communities and humanities disciplines. Public humanities work encompasses humanities research, teaching, preservation and programming, conducted for diverse individuals and communities. Publicly engaged humanities work, meanwhile, encompasses humanities research, teaching, preservation and programming, conducted with and for diverse individuals and communities. The innovative nature of this work, driven, often, by co-equal partnership with community members and institutions, broadens...
2009
"Who owns the humanities?" Let me propose an initial response to my own question: the people own the humanities. Readers of books and periodicals, theater-goers, concert-goers andfilm viewers, museum visitors, public lecture attendees and local book-club discussants, culturaltravelers and every individual citizen or member of any affinity group who, for whatever reason,seeks to access any of the venues that deliver on the "humanities," as conveniently -- albeitbureaucratically -- defined by the National Endowment for the Humanities. Institutions of higher education can and should promote the humanities and seek to widen access to the humanities --but they don't own them, and whenever academies do try to do that, they end up stifling themand creating blowback, whether we're talking about the French Academy in the 18th century ornational education policy commissions in the U.S. in the 21st century.
Reflections from the National Humanities Center
In the article, the consequences of overly partisan behavior, the decline of civility, the unique DNA of today’s college student and the impact of technology, and the significance of the NHC in supporting a healthy university environment in which the humanities are front and center is discussed.
State Councils, the Humanities, and the American Public
Elizabeth Lynn's monograph tells the story of the State Humanities Councils, which were established by the National Endowment for the Humanities in 1972 for one set of purposes and have evolved since then to form an important civic network. My "Forward" places this story in the context of a 500-year debate about the public purposes of the humanities.
The Humanities and the Future of the University
1997
In 1989, the Humanities Research Group was founded at the University of Windsor to promote research in all areas of the humanities and the exchange of ideas among disciplines. That mandate, while ambitious, seemed manageable, even laudatory. A scant eight years later, however, the stakes have become much higher. Institutions that promote the humanities have been called upon to argue for their continued survival. Attacks on the humanities have become de rigueur, whether they take the form of benign neglect from university administrators or the virulent denunciations of some politicians. The threat which currently confronts the humanities is real ahd imminent. Universities across the continent, in response to funding crises, are "restructuring" with the too frequent result that the humanities are "downsized." The continuing marginalization of the humanities in the academy was the immediate impetus for the Distinguished Speaker Series, "The Humanities and the Future of the University," from which this volume emanates. The humanities in Canadian universities have been so weakened by neglect and hostility that their very survival is threatened. The consequences of this course of action have been ill-considered and ignored by politicians seeking to reduce deficits and by university administrators who make decisions equally with an .eve on the bottom line. Demands for demonstrable relevance and skills training have cast a dark shadow over the flexibility and sophistication that characterizes the product of a humanist education. These are the traits which are abundantly evident in the thought, but also in the careers, of the contributors to this volume. Humanists, critical thinkers all, but also practical people, able administrators and organizers, they are living examples of the usefulness of the humanities. They are not only leaders in their fields of studies, but also in the quest for a stronger academy which honours its traditions while embracing changing values and circumstances. Their insights into the workings of the education system and the construction of the contemporary culture of education versus training are both illuminating and chilling. These are the voices of the eleventh hour, calling everyone concerned with education, and indeed with civilization, to take heed of the structural undermining of the humanities which is proceeding all too rapidly. If permanent irreparable damage to the foundations of our educational and social systems is to V vi Preface be avoided, these voices must be heard now, not only by the converted, by the believer in the studia humanitatis, but also by politicians and university administrators. Most important of all, however, the general public must take notice of the current state of affairs because the marginalization or disappearance of the humanities will affect the shape of the world in which we live, and which we bequeath to our children. As is so often the case, this volume, the sixth in the series Working Papers in the Humanities, owes much to the support of many people. Dr Ron Ianni, President of the University of Windsor, lent his support at a critical time. Dr Sue Martin, Dean of Arts was unfailingly generous and encouraging. Dr Lois Smedick was there at every turn to lend her wisdom and her help. Finally, without Meagan Pufahl and Rosemary Halford, this volume would not have seen the light of day. To all of them, our profound thanks.