Chinese-language media and social cohesion in Australia (original) (raw)
Related papers
East Asia Forum quarterly, 2017
Negotiation key to balancing Sino-US interests Allan Gyngell Australia's China policy challenge Andrew J. Nathan Self-interest shapes policies for the international order Wanning Sun Chinese-language media and social cohesion in Australia Ien Ang Engaging Australia's Chinese diaspora ... and more ASIAN REVIEW-Kent E. Calder: The rebirth of Eurasian geopolitics
Politics of Accommodation of the Rise of China: the case of Australia
Journal of Contemporary China, 2012
In the context of the rise of China, Southeast Asian countries and Australia have begun shifting towards an accommodation policy. Robert Ross examines the accommodation policy in South Korea, Mochizuki discusses Japanese accommodationists, and Manicom and O'Neil show some evidence of Australian accommodation of Chinese strategic preferences. The scholarship has, however, narrowly focused on and overestimated the role of security. Through a study of the origin, process, structural conditions and impacts of accommodation policy, this paper broadens the concept of accommodation to capture its multiple meanings and practices. It finds that a selective accommodation policy and strategy toward the rise of China developed in Australia is a sign of the changing power relations under which the mainstream paradigms of containment and engagement, hard balancing or bandwagoning, have proved inadequate to the task of dealing with China, and that economic interdependence has driven the politics of accommodation in Australia and several Asian countries. Over the course of just a few decades, China has progressed from being a relatively marginal member of the international community to being a key participant in economic, political and security issues at both regional and global levels. 1 A rising China has created a mishmash of opportunity, uncertainty and risk for secondary states that have, in turn, adopted mixed strategies of balancing, engagement, hedging and accommodation in the Asia-Pacific region. The pace and nature of China's ongoing ascendancy also generate serious US anxiety about China as a potential rival, and in Australia there are concerns about being caught between the US and China. Scholars and policymakers have discussed a variety of measures to deal with the 'rise' of China including containment, engagement, 'congagement', 2 hedging strategy, 3
Book Review: China's Grand Strategy and Australia's Future in the New Global Order
Australian Journal of Defence and Strategic Studies, 2021
China is the conundrum of our time. Since becoming General Secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in 2012, Xi Jinping has fundamentally changed China’s relationship with the world. This tectonic shift, from China ‘bidding its time’ to an aggressive assertiveness, has significantly impacted Australia. Given these momentous changes, Geoff Raby, Australia’s Ambassador to China (2007–2011), decided to sum up his 30 years working in and on China in a book: China’s Grand Strategy and Australia’s Future in the New Global Order. His book is incisive, insightful and informative and has already attracted many favourable reviews. Given this journal’s readership, this book review will principally discuss the strategies and strategic thinking that Raby discerns China following, and that which he thinks Australia should adopt in response.
Chinese views of Australian foreign policy: Not a flattering picture
Australian Journal of International Affairs, 2016
The economic importance and strategic significance of Australia’s relationship with China means that bilateral ties have become a major focus of attention in the scholarly and policymaking communities in this country. Understandably enough, perhaps, less attention has begin given to the way the relationship is understood in China. This paper addresses this absence in the literature by providing an overview of some of the more important contributions to the discussion in China. The most important point that emerges from such an analysis is that there is an ‘asymmetry of interest’ in the two countries, with Australia occupying a far less prominent place in Chinese policy discussions than China does in Australia. Equally noteworthy is the fact that the study of Sino-Australian relations in China is characterized by a greater variety of perspectives than it is in Australia. Appreciating this diversity is an essential part of developing a more accurate understanding of the policymaking milieu in China
The Political Performance of Contestation and Adaptation in Australian-Chinese Relations
The China Question, 2022
Australia's neighbour to the north, China, has posed a series of complex challenges to the identity politics of Australia throughout the Twentieth Century and continues to do so today. Paranoias include those regarding Chinese investment into local property and its supposed impact on increasing property prices (Rogers et al. 2015), Chinese investment into Australia's agricultural and mining infrastructure industries (McCarthy and Song 2018), Chinese migration (Forrest et al. 2017), the potentiality of a Chinese military threat (Glaser and Szerlip 2011), and more recently Chinese infiltration into Australian politics (Head 2018). The Chinese question for Australia is therefore multifaceted and ranges from concerns
China's Rise and the rules-based liberal order: Implications for Australia
Pearls and Irritations, 2018
The prosperity of millions of Australians has become dependent on the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The sheer material importance of the Chinese economy to Australia means that policymakers in this country have no other option other than to try and get the relationship right – even if they are not happy about what China’s so-called rise may mean for other elements of Australian foreign policy. If we want to understand why Australia’s relationship with China (and the region) is so controversial at times, we need to put it in historical context and think about the different, often contradictory foreign policy goals that have been pursued over the years.
Realistic Relations? How the Evolving Bilateral Relationship is Understood in China and Australia
Pacific Focus, 2017
China's remarkable economic development has had profound domestic and international effects. Among the most important of these is China's growing impact on the region of which it is an increasingly important and influential part. For countries such as Australia, which has rapidly become deeply economically integrated with – even dependent on – China, this presents a major and much‐discussed challenge as it tries to balance economic and strategic priorities. Australia provides an important and revealing illustration of how China's elites view key states in its region, which have assumed a growing economic and even strategic importance. This paper aims to develop a more comprehensive overview of the way the strategic, economic and political dimensions of the Sino–Australia relationship are understood in both countries. It also highlights the importance of realist thinking in both Australia and China.
China-Australia Relations and China's Policy Choices toward Australia: A Chinese Perspective
Since 2016, Australia's attitude toward China has taken a turn for the worse, and Sino-Australian relations have seen a signi cant decline. With regard to the change in Australia's attitude toward China, Chinese scholars initially analyzed it mainly from the perspective of the U.S.-Australia alliance and the China-U.S.-Australia triangle, viewing U.S. in uence as the key reason for the change in Australia's policy toward China. Later, Chinese scholars have become increasingly aware of the signi cant policy autonomy in Australia's China policy and the inadequacy of viewing Australia's China policy from the U.S. perspective. On the one hand, Australia's unique threat perception and interest perception have shaped the characteristics of its China policy; on the other hand, how to e ectively balance security interests and economic interests is a long-standing dilemma faced by Australia under the strategic competition between China and the U.S. e Australian government has shown a degree of policy exibility in its approach. e limited coercive economic measures taken by China against Australia have sent clear policy signals to Australia and have become a factor in uencing its policy towards China. In the coming period, although no obvious opportunity for improvement in China-Australia relations is in sight, both sides may be more prudent and pragmatic strategically, and China-Australia relations can be expected to remain basically stable at a low level.