The Letter of St Bernard in Modern Day Templarism (original) (raw)
Related papers
Notes on Templar personnel and government at the turn of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries
Journal of Medieval History, 2009
The Hospital of St John is thought to have been in various respects in a rather more healthy condition than the order of the Temple in the late thirteenth century, and comparisons and contrasts between the two orders have recently been made, often to the detriment of the Templars. This view is examined with reference to recruiting, the role of sergeants, ignorance among brothers, provincial administration, central government, and roles after the collapse of the crusader states. The argument is advanced that the Temple was not in a noticeably worse state than the Hospital and that on many issues the similarities between the two orders are more marked than the differences.
The Templars, Sionists, and the Freemasons Book One -Episode 13 - Saint Bernard
Saint Bernard de Clairvaux, whose name was well known in the Christian world us said to be the actual founder of the Order of Knights Templar. Evens if this is not true, he was the primary supporter and defender. The discovery made by the Knights Templar in Jerusalem is a real dilemma, and this gave rise to their fame in history. Saint Bernard was the one who provided this through the Cistercian Order that followed the Benedictines in the Mediaeval Era. Knights Templar were excessively praised throughout Europe, which in turn continued with donations to the Order. Then these knights started to grow in number and established their units of management in almost every country, supported by successive popes who gave them too many privileges.
Saints or Sinners? The Knights Templar in Medieval Europe
History Today, vol. 44.12, 1994
In October 1307, by order of Philip IV of France, all the Knights Templar within the French domains were arrested. In November, Pope Clement V sent out orders for the arrest of the Templars throughout Europe. The brothers were accused of a variety of crimes, which were said to be long-established in the order. There were, it was claimed, serious abuses in the admission ceremony, where the brothers denied their faith in Christ. The order encouraged homosexual activity between brothers. The brothers worshipped idols. Chapter meetings were held in secret. The brothers did not believe in the mass or other sacraments of the church and did not carry these out properly, defrauding patrons of the order who had given money for masses to be said for their families' souls. What was more, it was alleged that the Templars did not make charitable gifts or give hospitality as a religious order should. The order encouraged brothers to acquire property fraudulently, and to win profit for the order by any means possible. During the trial of the Templars witnesses claimed that the order's abuses had been notorious far many years and under interrogation, including torture, many brothers confessed to at least some of these crimes. In March 1312, Pope Clement dissolved the Order of' the Temple, giving its property of the Order of the Hospital, and assigning the surviving brothers to other religious orders. Despite this, the question of the order's guilt has never been settled. Just what were the accusations made against the Templars before 1300, and were these related to the trial? What did contemporaries think about the other military orders, such as the Knights Hospitaller and the Teutonic Knights? This article argues that, from the evidence, the famous, shocking charges brought against the Templars in 1307 were unknown before 1300. The order was certainly guilty of Fraud and unscrupulous greed, but so too were other religious orders. The brothers' real crime was their failure to protect the Holy Land after claiming to be solely responsible for its defence.
The Changing Face of the Templars: Current Trends in Historiography
History Compass, 2010
Although French, German and British scholars of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries did much to lay the foundations of scholarly study of the Knights Templars, until the 1970s there were few good general histories of the Templars. Over the last three decades, there has been enormous growth in scholarly research and publication on the history of the Templars, although the mushrooming myths about the order make it difficult for non-experts to distinguish between good and bad history. The Templars were a religious order, protected by the pope. They were also a military order, which fought against Islam in defence of Christian pilgrims and Christian territory and played a key role in the crusades. Their leading members were knights, but most of their members were not warriors, and included priests and women, who served God through prayer rather than by fighting. As well as castles and estates in the Middle East, they had property throughout Europe; they served kings and popes as diplomats and advisors. Far from being secretive-as the mythmakers claim-they opened their churches to local people and lodged travellers in their houses. They were pious men who shared the same faith as the Christians they protected. Historians disagree over where the initiative for the order came from-was it the idea of the first Templars themselves, or did Churchmen suggest it to them? The significance of the Templars' operations in the 'crusader kingdoms' in Palestine and Syria has been much discussed. Historians also disagree over the causes of the trial of the Templars (1307-1312), and how far the Templars were innocent victims of a struggle for supremacy between the papacy and the monarchy of France.
OMS - CBCS - Brief History of the Knights Templar extract
OMS - Complete CBCS Vol. 1, 2015
The Knights Templar have been the subject of nearly a millennium of myth and legend. Esoteric societies such as Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, Martinism, and other less known and more hidden bodies are recount numerous legends of these crusader Knights. Here, we will recount a brief summary of the Order’s history and attempt to fill in so-called secret or esoteric history passed down through the Strict Observance, Rite Écossais Rectifié, C.B.C.S., EASIE-EASIA, and other rites.
The knightly brothers of Bernard of Clairvaux and the twelfth-century Cistercian lay monk
Journal of Religious History 47 (2), 2023
Abbot Bernard of Clairvaux (r. 1115–1153) was a prominent twelfth-century religious leader whose knightly family collectively converted to monastic life with him in adulthood around 1113. Following Clairvaux's foundation in 1115, Bernard's brothers held roles of significant estate seniority despite their own professional limitations as newly converted and apparently illiterate knights. This study discusses their professional backgrounds and contexts as “lay monks” or monachi laici, converts who possessed no prior church grade or formally recognised Latin competence. The careers of Bernard's brothers and other Benedictines across the eleventh to early thirteenth centuries illuminate a number of the ways in which secular converts could contribute to their abbeys as culturally mixed and prosperous religious estate communities.
This PhD dissertation examined diverse narrative, legislative, and epistolary texts concerning conversion and leadership patterns in new religious communities of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, with particular reference to Bernard of Clairvaux and early Cistercian monasticism. Congregations such as the Fonte Avellanesi, the Grandmontines, the Premonstratensians, and the Benedictines of Molesme were analysed to provide comparative perspectives. The thesis described the eleventh-century background of Cistercian asceticism and the secular contexts for Bernard of Clairvaux's early career. It examined the evidence on his extreme and idiosyncratic asceticism and situated his practices within the context of submission to abbatial and episcopal governance..