“Friends, not foes”. Qualificazione penalistica delle attività delle ONG di soccorso in mare alla luce del diritto internazionale e tipicità della condotta (original) (raw)

Il Port State Control sulle navi delle ONG che prestano soccorso in mare: tutela della sicurezza della navigazione o ostacolo alle attività di soccorso?

Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale, 2021

Port State Control on NGOs Vessels Engaged in Rescue at Sea: Maritime Safety Protection or Obstacle to SAR Activities? In its Recommendation on cooperation among Member States concerning operations carried out by vessels owned or operated by private entities for the purpose of search and rescue activities, the European commission underlines that it is a matter of public policy that these vessels be suitably registered and properly equipped to meet the relevant safety and health requirements associated with SAR activities. Indeed, since 2020, almost all vessels operated by search and rescue NGOs in the Mediterranean Sea have been inspected and detained by Italian Authorities in accordance with the provisions of Paris Memorandum on Port State Control and European Directive 2009/16. This paper addresses de issue of the legitimacy of these inspections and subsequent ship detentions in the light of applicable European and international law. On the outcome of a deep analysis of the rules con-cerning vessels classification and statutory certification we conclude that international law does not provide specific requirements for private vessels engaged in SAR activities.

Umanitarismo competitivo Le ONG nei processi dell’aiuto e dell’emergenza

Indice SAGGI 6 IL GLOBALISMO GIURIDICO 7 DANILO ZOLO LE MIGRAZIONI NEI PROCESSI DI GLOBALIZZAZIONE. UNA CONVERSAZIONE CON SASKIA SASSEN 16 A CURA DI FEDERICO OLIVIERI L'ECCEZIONE COME REGOLA: PARADOSSO DI UNA IDENTIFICAZIONE 31 ANNA MARIA CAMPANALE GENETICA UMANA E DIRITTO: PROBLEMI E PROSPETTIVE 41 MARCO CROCE UMANITARISMO COMPETITIVO 58 NICOLÒ BELLANCA UN'INTRODUZIONE AL MONDO ISLAMICO SCIITA 82 PEJMAN ABDOLMOHAMMADI LETTURE 101 LA CONTROVERSIA SUGLI INDIOS 102 GIUSEPPE TOSI NATURA, ETICA E POLITICA 107 LEONARDO MARCHETTONI SAGGI Bibliografia Bobbio, N., Il problema della guerra e le vie della pace, Bologna, il Mulino, 1984. Dezalay, Y., Marchands de droit: la restructuration de l'ordre juridique international par les multinationales du droit, Paris, Fayard, 1992. Habermas, J., Kants Idee des ewigen Friedens -aus dem historischen Abstand von 200

Navi-drone e obbligo internazionale di prestare soccorso in mare

Rivista del diritto della navigazione, 2021

This article aims at contributing to the debate on the possibility to extend to pilots of unmanned ships the shipmaster’s duty to render assistance at sea, as well as on the overall compatibility with the said duty of the advent of such ships. To this end, the content and scope of the duty to render assistance at sea, as well as of the related obligations, are briefly described. This will allow not only to consider these obligations applicable to pilots of unmanned ships, but also to argue that the use of such ships does not conflict, in principle, with their content. On the other hand, in assessing the compatibility of the use of unmanned ships with respect to the aforementioned duty, the investigation will be extended beyond the aspects relating to a possible violation of the duty in the strict sense, examining the overall consistency of the search and rescue legal regime, as well as its future effectiveness. On the basis of this analysis, the need to integrate the regulatory framework will be supported, and some possible solutions will be indicated within the framework of the recent trends that characterize the regulatory activity conducted by the International Maritime Organization.

Il caso della Sea-Watch 3 tra obblighi di diritto del mare, diritti umani e tutela dell’infanzia

Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, 2019

This article focuses on the affair of the Sea Watch 3, a ship that, after rescuing forty-seven people in distress at sea, including fifteen minors, was blocked in Italian territorial waters for more than ten days, with the survivors forbidden from disembarking. Different profiles of the facts are analyzed, starting from the relevant obligations associated with international maritime law, and the question of the disembarkation in a place of safety. We then try to verify whether the naval blockade ordered by the Italian authorities, which forced the boat to moor in front of the port of Syracuse for more than ten days, can be considered a deprivation of freedom of the people on board. Finally, the investigation focuses on how far the Italian authorities’ treatment of unaccompanied minors complies with the international, European and national obligations to which Italy is bound.