Framing educational policy discourse in neoliberal contexts: debates around the public university in a Chilean newspaper (original) (raw)
Related papers
Key elements in the naturalisation of neoliberal discourse in higher education in Chile
Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2018
Neoliberal discourse has undergone substantial changes over the last years, taking a status as if it were a natural given. In this article we analyse the naturalisation of neoliberal discourse in higher education in post-dictatorship Chile. Based on discourse analysis of two Chilean higher education policy reports, we examine the reconfiguration of the dimensions of the public and the private and identify three discursive prerequisites for the naturalisation of neoliberalism in Chilean higher education: first, the silencing of the dictatorial origins of the system; second, the idea of neutrality as a means to present public and private higher education as if they were equal; and third, the role of social democracy in a 180 degrees’ inversion of meanings of the public and the private. We finally look into recent developments in Chilean society such as the Chilean students’ movement from 2011 that triggered the questioning of the naturalisation of neoliberal discourse.
The State, Public Universities and Public Goods: Time for a New Settlement—The Case of Chile
Higher Education Policy, 2020
In Chile, higher education is characterised by a constellation of features that make ‘public’ a multiplicitous idea. In the present study, academics in two public universities are seen to hold strong views in favour of public universities playing public roles and they identify several public goods that they value. These academics also hold ambivalent perceptions of the relationships between the state and the market. On the one hand, the market and the state’s role in it are accorded a limited legitimacy. On the other hand, it is felt that the state does not sufficiently enable its public universities to realise their potential. The paper proceeds to argue that in this ambivalence can be detected four juxtapositions. It is suggested that these juxtapositions together open a space for a new settlement between the state and its public universities such that Chilean public universities might more fully realise their public possibilities.
EDULEARN proceedings, 2019
Beginning in 2010, with the post-neoliberal government of the self-styled "Revolución Ciudadana", a reform of the higher education policy in Ecuador begins. The Ecuadorian government proposed to give the State a more important role in the management of the economy and in the management of several other areas of public life. Among them to higher education. That is to say, the debate on the role of the university and its relationship with the productive sector and society in general was revitalized. This reform was characterized by a tension between the academy and the government. It was marked by periods of collaboration and others of a strong confrontation; whose moment culminating was the promulgation of a new law of higher education. There were coincidences between these two types of actors, among which the following stand out: the conception of higher education as a public good, the prioritization of research and the search for quality. However, on the other hand, there were discrepancies in several aspects: the centralization and governmental control, the conception of autonomy, the forms of evaluation of university quality, the university typology proposed by the government, the use of rankings and international indicators, and the conception of the role of the university in the economic system. The importance of studying these normative definitions, discourses and definitions of politics relates to the fact that they oriented the university reform that took place in Ecuador and that had and still has deep consequences in the internal structures of the universities, in their budgets, in its institutional culture and in the daily activities of the university professor. In this regard, this work is a case study on the processes of change in higher education policies within the framework of post-neoliberal governments. The theoretical considerations raised support the use of a socio-institutional approach based on the new institutionalism, taking into account the strategic interaction of the relevant actors [1]. This, together with the analysis of public policies, allows us to explain the change of higher education policy, paying attention to the role of ideas, interests and institutions. That is to say, it is intended to construct an analytical narrative that accounts for the causality of the change in the Ecuadorian higher education policy. To answer these questions, interviews will be carried out with a group of protagonists of the processes of definition and execution of these policies throughout these years. In addition, the discourses of the state authorities of these years and those included in development plans, laws and decrees of higher education, among other regulations and official documents are analyzed.
education policy analysis archives
Using critical discourse analysis (CDA), we explored how educational leaders and policymakers in Mexico, Peru, Chile, and Argentina address complex issues while responding to – and in fact, developing – broader understandings (discourses) on the role of higher education in Latin America. Fairclough’s (1993) theory of discourse underscores that language is a social practice, socially and historically situated, and encompassing social identities, relations, and systems of knowledge and beliefs. Therefore, discourses, which are represented by all kinds of texts, exercise power because they can produce, reproduce, and transform social structures, including education policy. This study uncovers the nuances of the tensions that globalized discourses such as neoliberalism in particular face when met with national and local needs in Latin American higher education. These tensions need to be addressed in order to design policies that could effectively close the equity gap in the region amids...
Neoliberalisation and the “Death of the Public University”
Anuac, 2016
The advance of neoliberalism is often linked to what many authors describe as the "death of the public university". Taking up this theme, we explore the idea of the "neoliberal university" as a model and its implications for academia. We argue that this model is having a transformative effect, not only the core values and distinctive purpose of the public university, but also on academic subjectivities of the professional ethos that has traditionally shaped academia.
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management , 2019
In this paper, the public dimension of universities in Chile is examined. Interviews were held with academics at both public and private well-established universities and new private universities. The analysis shows a consensus regarding the production of certain public goods such as knowledge, wider access and the promotion of a public sphere. It also reveals a dissensus such that academics at well-established universities tend to maintain a statist view of the public university in which the state plays a key role while academics at new private universities characteristically adopt an individualist view in which the university is detached from the state and more focused on securing social mobility. Drawing on an Archerian framework, it is suggested that these perceptions have been shaped by global, national and especially institutional factors. Critical questions arise concerning the possibility of spaces for new perceptions of the public dimension of universities.
Desigualdad en El Contexto Público: El Rol de Neoliberalismo en la Educación
2014
Este estudio analiza los factores que contribuyen a la desigualdad en el contexto público de educación en Chile. El trabajo de campo de esta investigación enfoco en las escuelas Liceo Miguel Cervantes y Saavedra y El Instituto Nacional José Miguel Carrera para analizar cuales factores que contribuyen a diferencias en calidad, y desigualdad en el contexto público. Esta muestra de estas dos escuelas revelo que los dos factores que contribuyen más a la desigualdad entre escuelas en el contexto público son recursos, y procesos de selección. El término Índice 1Introducción……………………………………………………………………………...4